• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

tea party sits it out --- WHY??????[W: 181]

...Urban Dictionary...

Yes, they are very well known for their definitions of sexually related terms that are not usually included in mainstream dictionaries.
 
Yes, I do. My facts are called History.


Read... it does a mind good.

Post it and I will. Don't make accusations or statements and then provide no support to your claim. I suspect this is just a symptom of your lack of it though.
 
Yes, they are very well known for their definitions of sexually related terms that are not usually included in mainstream dictionaries.
Yet, they are still accurately defined. As you are by the aforementioned name. I won't debate this with you anymore as this is turning into a case of you nitpicking my posts without proof of the claims you make.
 
I know what it looks like to the biased readers who read comments they disagree with.

I appreciate the moderation of the term "tea-bagger" on this forum, though. Really. Many political forums ban users for using terms like these because they may offend the precious feelings of other readers.

Thanks.

Has nothing to do with comments they disagree with. Making stupid partisan comments does not further your argument. It makes your argument weak; it's an ad hom, nothing more. If you want to present as weak, be my guest.
 
I name-call a lot and usually against conservative ideas.

If people get so emotionally invested in a forum post, then what they have to say is usually worthless because they are mainly dependent on their emotions, which I consider to be useless, if not harmful to social progress.



Are you talking about yourself? It is obvious you use the term for emotional reasons, not factual. the fact you think you need to use such vulgarity to get your message accross, to me suggests you are masking a lack of intellectual capital to spend on the topic.
 
Conservatives don't have to like Reagan to prove their support for any and all discrimination against minorities. That's a core tenet of conservatism -- minorities have to be exploited, abused and blamed for all the wrongs in society. It has been this way since the start of human civilization, around 10,000 years ago, and in every written history of all societies anywhere in the world.


Yes, I do. My facts are called History.


Read... it does a mind good.

Amazing **** folks, pay attention here. This is a great example of an extreme leftist.
 
Amazing **** folks, pay attention here. [...]

I do a lot of name-calling myself, so I don't mind of your crap terms you try to apply to me.

Racism is a core belief and a core tenet of conservatism. Deal with it because you can't deny reality and human history.
 
I do a lot of name-calling myself, so I don't mind of your crap terms you try to apply to me.

Racism is a core belief and a core tenet of conservatism. Deal with it because you can't deny reality and human history.


Paralogic not all conservatives are racists and that is not a core tenet of conservatism...I am not a conservative in most sense of the word, howerver, I do agree with alot of things they are for....you need to chill with the racist stuff and call a racist as you see one if the pop up...you just run around turning over stones looking for them
 
I do a lot of name-calling myself, so I don't mind of your crap terms you try to apply to me.

Racism is a core belief and a core tenet of conservatism. Deal with it because you can't deny reality and human history.

Let's see some proof of this claim.
 
Back
Top Bottom