Well what do you think we should keep, change, or get rid of, on that list, since you're being so vague about what you actually do think.
Head Start Kindergarten - Modify or replace completely
Race to the Top education standards - needs testing/application/extensive use over a longer period (in full effect) before any assessment can be made, though I disagree with some of its goals/implementations
Pell Grants - restructured utilizing a field-sponsored grant program for in-demand careers, eliminate grants for undeclared students or those majoring in disciplines that have a flooded job market; limit the life-time maximum receipt of funds
Health Care provisions that let children be on their parents accounts until 25 - I'm not sure of all of the restrictions on this, but I think it's completely ridiculous for a 26 (that's the current age, not 25) year old to be on their parent's insurance program if they're otherwise self-sufficient and not in school. This clause, if it applies at all, should be limited
only to those 26 and under who are still enrolled in college and who are not also working full time jobs.
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - Doesn't really do anything to actually
ensure fair pay, it just extends the amount of time available to file a claim of wage discrimination. Don't really care about it one way or the other as it seems more like a bandaid instead of stitches.
Low interest rates on student loans - I disagree with this solution to the student loan debt problem. It doesn't actually
solve any problems, it simply shifts responsibility
Laws that health care must that cover preventative care and birth control - I don't agree that I should receive free birth control and yearly wellness exams for free. I can afford my insurance premiums for every other medication and yearly check-up. Why is this one somehow special? Should men receive free testicular cancer screenings and condoms?
Prenatal Care - What policies are we discussing, exactly?
Tax cuts for small businesses - it depends on what taxes and how they're funded, and in what amounts they're offered. A "tax cut" is not necessarily beneficial simply because it exists
Medicare - this program is essentially under water, and made more so by Obamacare. Why would I support a program that has exacerbated the non-public increase in healthcare costs by underpaying for covered services and practitioners? It should be completely revamped, revised, or thrown out and recreated
Social Security - ultimately unsustainable. There should be more choice involved for those who are paying into the system. And, the money should be truly off limits to other spending programs and fiscal requests of the U.S. government.