• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Mitt Romney's Speech To Enthusiastic Otterbein University Students

Okay, I did my own research since you dodged the question. NONE. Between the two of them they have zero Republican primary wins. That and a token will get you cup of coffee.

and your silly rant has nothing to do with your claims that race is at issue. Caine was very popular with many REPUBLICANS and several polls of REPUBLICANS have Dr Rice as tops for a VP selection

I realize the far left paid Obama operatives feel a need to try to play the race card. Given how pathetic your messiah's performance has been, the last thing you want to run on is his record.
 
I don't want average people being the president of the united states. I have spent most of my life making sure I wasn't average. Most winners are that way too

Are they shameless self-promoters as well? :lamo
 
what crap-empathy to the envious whiners means what-demanding more and more taxes?

You don't help losers by punishing winners
Permit me to set my Grey Poupon aside and complete that for you: 'You win by punishing losers.' Amiright? :2razz:
 
Yeah, I saw that, and it's yet another reason why people like Romney shouldn't be governing us: because they have never had to earn a paycheck with the understanding that if they didn't, they wouldn't be able to pay their rent. This is the reality that the entire nation (pretty much) has to face every day. If Romney has never experienced that, then he doesn't know who we are and I don't trust him to make decisions that are in our best interests.

And before anyone shouts "class warfare arrgh!" I'm not distinguishing between the rich and the poor, but between the working and the "never needed to earn money to pay for their needs ever." I myself am not poor, but face the reality that if I were ever to just stop working, I'd be perfectly screwed in two years. Romney has never experienced that potentiality, and therefore can't understand us.



what relevance does this have. Its pathetic class envy again. Romney for sure and Obama most likely, have IQ's far about 98% of the population. Neither can relate to people who have average, slightly above average, slightly below average or dullard levels of intelligence.
 
Caine is a stupid idiot, but even better for Republicans, he's a lunatic and black at the same time.

Rice is wiling mental slave to her white superiors. Both her and her mental master, Cheney, have acknowledge that much in public statements and books.

Republicans always count on the racist vote. Single events here and there may not play into their public strategy, but racism is a core tenet of conservatism and Republicans always count on it for votes.


YOu sure haven't posted anything that would really indicate you have the ability to call Caine-who is a very successful businessman a stupid idiot. THese hysterical claims are nothing more than poe idiocy IMHO.

THe dems can always count on the anti white racists' votes. In addition, when it comes to rich white democrats, Racism is the core tenet of affirmative action and that attitude that many leftwing elitists have that minorities aren't smart enough to fend for themselves.
 
Permit me to set my Grey Poupon aside and complete that for you: 'You win by punishing losers.' Amiright? :2razz:


more class envy. NOthing shouts out someone is content to wallow in mediocrity than posts like that.
 
Permit me to set my Grey Poupon aside and complete that for you: 'You win by punishing losers.' Amiright? :2razz:

Now you've finally figured it out.

In sports we punish players for wrongdoing and failure. In football, the punishment is in yardage. Hockey players are given 2 minute penalties.

If we have to increase taxes, we should have a "punishment tax" on those making minimum wage.

Those who are successful should be rewarded by having their tax rate reduced.
 
On behalf of the other members of this site, let me officially thank you for taking some of your precious time and devoting it to helping us common people know how it is at the top. We seldom have the privilege of your superior insight and intellect to help us along our miserable way.

If I annoy the mediocre so be it. Most of the people on this board are better educated than the average person who cannot tell you who the two senators from his or her state is or name at least 5 of the supreme court justices. You have been here more than a year and have posted less than 50 times

I guess you haven't taken the opportunity to learn from the many well educated people-of all political leans-on this board.
 
what relevance does this have. Its pathetic class envy again. Romney for sure and Obama most likely, have IQ's far about 98% of the population. Neither can relate to people who have average, slightly above average, slightly below average or dullard levels of intelligence.
They should join DP then :2razz:
 
more class envy. NOthing shouts out someone is content to wallow in mediocrity than posts like that.
I would say that poor grammar and punctuation do.
 
Now you've finally figured it out.

In sports we punish players for wrongdoing and failure. In football, the punishment is in yardage. Hockey players are given 2 minute penalties.

If we have to increase taxes, we should have a "punishment tax" on those making minimum wage.

Those who are successful should be rewarded by having their tax rate reduced.
Shouldn't we just take their babies? After all, they probably won't be able to feed them if their taxes are increased. We could give the babies to the rich, who -- after their taxes are cut -- now have more disposable income.

Or are the babies to be punished too? You know, for being born to a 'failed' family. With, like, no trust fund or anything.
 
romney=kerry

LOL-Romney didn't marry into money

Romney didn't get turned down by Harvard Law

Romney had a successful private sector career

Romney didn't divorce his first wife when she became ill
 
Your posts are a constant testament to it.
LOL... now you're just flailing about instead of trying to make any sense at all :lamo
 
LOL-Romney didn't marry into money

Romney didn't get turned down by Harvard Law

Romney had a successful private sector career

Romney didn't divorce his first wife when she became ill


but the comparison is apt because like kerry, romney will utterly fail in his effort to unseat a weak uncumbent
and like kerry, it will be because he has nothing better to offer the electorate
 
Shouldn't we just take their babies? After all, they probably won't be able to feed them if their taxes are increased. We could give the babies to the rich, who -- after their taxes are cut -- now have more disposable income.

Or are the babies to be punished too? You know, for being born to a 'failed' family. With, like, no trust fund or anything.

why do people who work harder and smarter than you do have a duty to fund the stuff you want from the government?
 
LOL... now you're just flailing about instead of trying to make any sense at all :lamo


progressives by definition are flailing at a system they cannot stand
 
LOL-Romney didn't marry into money [...]

Romney didn't divorce his first wife when she became ill
Kerry = Gingrich? Or is it Kerry = McCain? :2razz:
 
Shouldn't we just take their babies? After all, they probably won't be able to feed them if their taxes are increased. We could give the babies to the rich, who -- after their taxes are cut -- now have more disposable income.

Or are the babies to be punished too? You know, for being born to a 'failed' family. With, like, no trust fund or anything.

Maybe we should start a "spay and neuter" program so there won't be any babies in that kind of dreadful situation.
 
why do people who work harder and smarter than you do have a duty to fund the stuff you want from the government?
Why do your posts so often consist solely of ad hominems, and so rarely of capitalization?
 
Maybe we should start a "spay and neuter" program so there won't be any babies in that kind of dreadful situation.
I'm sure the hard core conservative crowd has that plan on the shelf somewhere.
 
Why do your posts so often consist solely of ad hominems, and so rarely of capitalization?

wow you have read all my posts over the last almost 7 years? if not you are lying

If you have then......

you are lying about me

which one is it?
 
Back
Top Bottom