Gie
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2011
- Messages
- 970
- Reaction score
- 248
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Adios, I mean you were already ignoring me pointing out that you had some basic facts about me wrong. I guess putting me on "ignore" is easier than admitting you were wrong about my lean (has not changed since the day I joined) or the fact that I've never posted a word about Romney at this forum. Ever. Or about whom I will support for POTUS. So yeah, you better take the high moral ground route all brave internet warriors take and put me on "ignore". Which is a laugh for a lot of reasons aside from how weak you look going to that cliched weak as hell internet hack whine.Ahh. Nice try, but I am not taking the bait. Onto the old ignore list you go.
NOTE: In my 15 years on internet forums, I have seen much better people than you attempt to bait me. In fact, your attempts here are pretty weak sauce. If you want to be successful at baiting people on the internet, then you are really going to have to step it up a few notches. Just trying to help you out here so that you don't flop so badly in your future baiting endeavors. Have a nice day...... And adios. LOL.
Yeah, I think I've got your number down and your "game" succinctly called out. Better call it "baiting you" and "attacking you" and you will just use the ignore feature! The one that we all know does not mean you won't still be reading and seeing every single post I make! The only thing IMO more stupid and useless than the ignore feature are the posers who say they are going to use it. Attah boy danarhea!