• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Santorum's speech last night

Thanks for all the thoughtful, non-trollish posts on this thread. Oddly, nobody seems to be interested in discussing Santorum's speech last night.
No, most of us wish he would just go away... and stop costing us votes in the general election...
 
Thanks for all the thoughtful, non-trollish posts on this thread. Oddly, nobody seems to be interested in discussing Santorum's speech last night.

Rick needs to convince Newt to drop out now.

If he can't accomplish that, then he shouldn't bother giving another campaign speech.
 
Rick needs to convince Newt to drop out now.

If he can't accomplish that, then he shouldn't bother giving another campaign speech.

In order for Rick to do that, he and Newt would have to negotiate and reach a compromise. But these are two things Republicans don't do.
 
Freedom. :2razz:

Knock me over with a sub-atomic particle. That would have been the very last word I would have chosen.

Personally, I'd liKe to have a president who is into leading...as oppose to one who is obsessed with "controlling".

Yeah! That's the word that I connect to Santorum..."CONTROLLER"!
 
lol

i remember that game well, including several times that it made me angry enough to toss the controls.

i'm not sure i ever beat Tyson without a cheat code.

I always thought it was great to have a champ named Mr. Sandman. Like a boxer today would have the hubris to name himself Mr. Sandman.

Obama=Mr. Sandman
Romney=Glass Joe
 
I always thought it was great to have a champ named Mr. Sandman. Like a boxer today would have the hubris to name himself Mr. Sandman.

Obama=Mr. Sandman
Romney=Glass Joe

Yeah... great comparison... since Romney is short, blonde, and all...

But if you're looking for a better comparison with Omama, it'd be Soda Popinki... given his socialist leanings and his penchant for inviting people to drink... They also both share strange ideas of healthcare... "After you lose, we'll drink to your health! Ha, ha, ha!"
 
Knock me over with a sub-atomic particle. That would have been the very last word I would have chosen.

Personally, I'd liKe to have a president who is into leading...as oppose to one who is obsessed with "controlling".

Yeah! That's the word that I connect to Santorum..."CONTROLLER"!

If you are opposed to control, then Rick Santorum is your guy. If you want control, go with Obama.
 
If you are opposed to control, then Rick Santorum is your guy. If you want control, go with Obama.

Except the part where he controls your sex life, right?
 
That part doesn't exist. So you lose.

I lose? That's not how you debate.
You cleary have no desire to see open-mindness, so I guess this is pretty useless.
 
Back
Top Bottom