Reposting the same contrieved notions and assumptions as if they're fact that your biased sited posted doens't make them any less speculative assumptions based on questionable evidence that is looked at with a biased eye.
User created the account the same day the video was uploaded. No other uploads.
Which proves...nothing other than it was a new account.
the very first place this video was posted was Jon Huntsman’s campaign website, Jon2012.com. This was done on January 4, the very day the video was uploaded to YouTube, and before the video had received any traffic from other sites.
Incorrect on multiple levels. First, the original place the video was posted was on Youtube, NOT on Huntsman site. Second, as your own link points out WAAAAAY far down the page (Gee, I wonder why), that was the first place to LINK to the video. Other sites EMBEDDED the video prior to them. Indeed, the embedding of the video onto a popular social media aggregate website occured before it was linked upon Huntsman's page.
So not only is your information there incorrect, but it is further information that in no way shows that it was a "fasle flag" perpetrated by Huntsman's campaign.
The tags were also a pretty clear give away. Edit: Jon2012 girl's Cain “spoof” video carries the same tag.
Jon2012girls is the handle that the girls hav been using on twitter and other such things. When you're including negative things about them in the ad, and hoping for people to find said ad, it would make sense to use said tag. That way as people search for that tag then your negative ad comes up.
Again, in no way shape or form proves its a "Huntsman false flag". This is precisely the point I was making with your biased piece. They took partial information, showed their clear and unquestionable bias towards Paul by refusing to put forth any attempt to be intellectually honest and look at all possible options, and immedietely proclaimed it through a massive leap based on an assumption that it was a false flag by Huntsman's people.
YouTube account NH4Santorum and uploaded the same video there, calling on viewers to vote for Santorum. NH4freedomRomney has also appeared . It too features the “China Jon” ad, and calls on viewers to vote for Mitt Romney.
Yes, note that this is pointed out as an "update" to your story. They were not put out in conjunction to the original but actually came up after the story began to spread, Ron Paul fans became upset it was being tied to them, and pieces like your biased link started suggesting it was a "false flag". This no more "proves" that it was Huntsman's people doing a false flag then it "proves" that Ron Paul's supporters created the other ones to try and frame huntsman.
Once again, you're making wild leaps based on assumptions and attempting to suggest they're some kind of proof.
Pretty bad con job if you ask me.
Yes, your attempt to paint this as a Huntsman camp false flag has been a pretty bad con job.
