- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
from Kai
It is called writing in the first person. In other words, Ron Paul speaking directly in his voice to the reader.
That is immaterial and shows you do not yet realize who you are trying to appeal to. Libertarians on these sort of sites are used to being the pimple on the body politics ass so they never ever concern themselves with the larger picture of actually winning elections. So you obsess and settle for you own imagined 'victories' in internet arguments. Its funny - its sad - its pathetic in the extreme but is pure libertarianism.
All American knows -all Americans care to know - is whose name was on that damn piece of extremist trash and they know who to hold responsible. Its really that clean and that clear cut and for libertarians not to realize that shows just how far they are removed from the real game.
See my answer to your point #2. It is irrelevant if he wrote every word or not one word. It is irrelevant if he signed every page as his own staffer says or he never ever saw one. It means nothing. The damn pieces of extremism trash have his name on them and Ron Paul owns them. That is all that matters.
I am telling you the straight truth without any sugar on it. I honestly want Paul to do well for the next several months. Heck, if he got the nomination I would consider it Christmas in summer. But I know not to wish for what is impossible. So instead I stay optimistically realistic. Hoping that Paul wins in Iowa, does well in South Carolina, wins in Virginia as the STOP ROMNEY candidate of last resort, and along the way gets royally dissed, cheated and screwed by the Republican establishment on the way to the convention. It would be a bonus if anyone but Romney then won.
That is all I was hoping for.
Now if Romney gets it, my next best scenario is for the angry as a hornet Paulites to demand that their hero run as a third party candidate and he does. That would be a great bonus like winning the new Lincoln with your winnings from the craps table as you leave the Vegas casino.
Sadly, Paul himself is screwing all this up with his horrid handling of the newsletter scandal. I had better hopes for him and perhaps i should have known better given the raw materials.
And thats the truth.
1: How could a newsletter have Ron Pauls voice? I could have sworn that a newsletter was written on paper...which doesn't have sound....
It is called writing in the first person. In other words, Ron Paul speaking directly in his voice to the reader.
2: It has been proven that the newsletters were written by ghostwriters. IE Ron Paul did not write them.
That is immaterial and shows you do not yet realize who you are trying to appeal to. Libertarians on these sort of sites are used to being the pimple on the body politics ass so they never ever concern themselves with the larger picture of actually winning elections. So you obsess and settle for you own imagined 'victories' in internet arguments. Its funny - its sad - its pathetic in the extreme but is pure libertarianism.
All American knows -all Americans care to know - is whose name was on that damn piece of extremist trash and they know who to hold responsible. Its really that clean and that clear cut and for libertarians not to realize that shows just how far they are removed from the real game.
3: There is no proof that Ron Paul even read the newsletters. Unless you really want to count the blog from someone who was fired? Should I offer to make that blog again?
See my answer to your point #2. It is irrelevant if he wrote every word or not one word. It is irrelevant if he signed every page as his own staffer says or he never ever saw one. It means nothing. The damn pieces of extremism trash have his name on them and Ron Paul owns them. That is all that matters.
Some how I doubt that you actually want him to do well. Or maybe you do? Maybe you want him in the primaries because if he is you think that Obama will have a chance of winning the election.
I am telling you the straight truth without any sugar on it. I honestly want Paul to do well for the next several months. Heck, if he got the nomination I would consider it Christmas in summer. But I know not to wish for what is impossible. So instead I stay optimistically realistic. Hoping that Paul wins in Iowa, does well in South Carolina, wins in Virginia as the STOP ROMNEY candidate of last resort, and along the way gets royally dissed, cheated and screwed by the Republican establishment on the way to the convention. It would be a bonus if anyone but Romney then won.
That is all I was hoping for.
Now if Romney gets it, my next best scenario is for the angry as a hornet Paulites to demand that their hero run as a third party candidate and he does. That would be a great bonus like winning the new Lincoln with your winnings from the craps table as you leave the Vegas casino.
Sadly, Paul himself is screwing all this up with his horrid handling of the newsletter scandal. I had better hopes for him and perhaps i should have known better given the raw materials.
And thats the truth.