• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Ron Paul banned from Dec 7 debate!

Can you believe this tripe? The Republican Jewish Coalition says his views are too extreme for them. I think this will help Ron Paul, and not hurt them like they want.

Paul BANNED from upcoming debate | Ron Paul 2012 | Sound Money, Peace and Liberty

It seems our money and banks are important to Jews, but not our Constitution!

There are 50,000 different ways to explain why their actions outrage you, and you picked one of the 5 ways to express those feelings incorrectly! That's impressive! :applaud
 
Can you believe this tripe? The Republican Jewish Coalition says his views are too extreme for them. I think this will help Ron Paul, and not hurt them like they want.

Paul BANNED from upcoming debate | Ron Paul 2012 | Sound Money, Peace and Liberty


It seems our money and banks are important to Jews, but not our Constitution!



Whoa, talk about taking something out of context.....I think his views are way to extreme and im not a jew...I dont read that as a jewish thing...I read it that they think hes too extreme...and I agree
 
Can you believe this tripe? The Republican Jewish Coalition says his views are too extreme for them. I think this will help Ron Paul, and not hurt them like they want.

Paul BANNED from upcoming debate | Ron Paul 2012 | Sound Money, Peace and Liberty

It seems our money and banks are important to Jews, but not our Constitution!

Oh for gods sake learn what the ****ing constitution actually says...

Private groups can invite whoever they want. If they don't want Paul, that is 100 % their right and Paul has no room to bitch.
 
And as a Libertarian, surely Dr. Paul would be the very first to say so.
 
For info, the following was the comments of The Executive Director of the RJC, Matthiew Brooks:

As Americans who are committed to a strong and vigorous foreign policy, we are deeply concerned about the prospective presidential campaign of Congressman Ron Paul. While Rep. Paul plans to run as a Republican, his views and past record place him far outside of the Republican mainstream. His candidacy, as we've seen in his past presidential campaigns, will appeal to a very narrow constituency in the U.S. electorate. Throughout his public service, Paul has espoused a dangerous isolationist vision for the U.S. and our role in the world. He has been a virulent and harsh critic of Israel during his tenure in Congress*. Most recently Paul gave an interview in which he voiced his objection to the recent killing of Osama Bin Laden. Brooks added, "We certainly respect Congressman Paul's right to run, but we strongly reject his misguided and extreme views, which are not representative of the Republican Party.

So piss off a large portion of the Jewish community with your actions, don't be surprised when they do not give you a platform to espouse your views.
 
For info, the following was the comments of The Executive Director of the RJC, Matthiew Brooks:

So piss off a large portion of the Jewish community with your actions, don't be surprised when they do not give you a platform to espouse your views.

so one has to bow down to a certain little country in the eastern Mediteranean in order to please the folks at the RJC?

that's not very fair..or American.
 
So...they want to have a political debate, and are inviting all the other candidates, even the no names...but leaving out Paul, because they, personally, don't like his views?




Nice. Right up there with our major media not allowing 3rd party candidates in their nationally televised debates. Even Mexico has a better track record than we do, it seems....
 
I personally don't think anyone should be excluded from debates either, but I doubt blaming the Jews and their "love for money and banks" is a great way to go about it.
 
so one has to bow down to a certain little country in the eastern Mediteranean in order to please the folks at the RJC?

that's not very fair..or American.

It is well within their rights. Would an anti-abortion group have to invite pro abortion rights candidate to speak at their event?
 
So...they want to have a political debate, and are inviting all the other candidates, even the no names...but leaving out Paul, because they, personally, don't like his views?


Nice. Right up there with our major media not allowing 3rd party candidates in their nationally televised debates. Even Mexico has a better track record than we do, it seems....




Kevin its a private organization...they can include or exclude whoever they choose...
 
It is well within their rights. Would an anti-abortion group have to invite pro abortion rights candidate to speak at their event?

well, you seem to be suggesting that the Republican Jewish Coalition might as well change its name to the Republican pro-Israel Committee. if that were the case, their non-inclusion of RP might make sense.

and frankly, I don't believe RP has said anything that bad about Israel.
 
It is well within their rights. Would an anti-abortion group have to invite pro abortion rights candidate to speak at their event?

Good question.

Do I have the right as the host to choose who I invite to my party?
 
Good question.

Do I have the right as the host to choose who I invite to my party?

yes, but this isn't a party. its a Presidential debate.

it would be one thing if RP was notorious for making anti-Semitic remarks, like the one in the OP.

but he's not.
 
well, you seem to be suggesting that the Republican Jewish Coalition might as well change its name to the Republican pro-Israel Committee. if that were the case, their non-inclusion of RP might make sense.

and frankly, I don't believe RP has said anything that bad about Israel.

Why? That is only one part of what they are about.

RJC - Republican Jewish Coalition

RJC Basic Principles National Security - the first responsibility of government
Without national security, every other debate is meaningless. Once freedom and democracy are gone, you have lost your vote - for/against abortion, for/against taxes, for/against healthcare, or any other topic.
America is the only democracy powerful enough to overcome the evil, enslavement and human rights abuses fostered by dictators, autocrats and other repressive regimes. Only America can and must lead the world in standing for the cause of freedom and democracy. The likely outcome of an America not intervening would be darkness overcoming light. Keeping the world free and safe for democracy is critical to our ability to be free citizens of our own country.
Imagine a world without American strength - what would it be? All of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa could be under Nazi or Communist rule. America would be alone and the rest of the world would be in darkness.
It’s not enough to have a strong military to protect our own borders; our national security also relies on us actively combating the forces of evil in the world.

That is the very first item on their platform. Now which candidate represents the exact opposite? This is what happens when we research before popping off, we are actually educated on what we are talking about.
 
It seems our money and banks are important to Jews, but not our Constitution!

I think it's wrong for them exclude Paul.

But your antisemitic comments are totally inappropriate.
 
I personally don't think anyone should be excluded from debates either, but I doubt blaming the Jews and their "love for money and banks" is a great way to go about it.

I blame the dark red Tea he must be drinking.
 
well, you seem to be suggesting that the Republican Jewish Coalition might as well change its name to the Republican pro-Israel Committee. if that were the case, their non-inclusion of RP might make sense.

and frankly, I don't believe RP has said anything that bad about Israel.

No, it's the Republican Jewish Coalition. Believe it or not, there are Conservative Jews too. In addition, I am insulted by the OP's reference to Jews and banks. This is what Adolf Hitler used to say too.

NOTE: I still believe the GOP should have invited Ron Paul, and then, during the debate, question him on his views. I do not believe that Paul is an anti-Semite. He does not want us to send our money to Israel any more than he wants us to send it to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
 
Last edited:
Wow, hold a debate and only invite one side of the discussion while misrepresenting the views of the other side as an excuse?

What a waste of time. Idiots.
 
...NOTE: I still believe the GOP should have invited Ron Paul, and then, during the debate, question him on his views. I do not believe that Paul is an anti-Semite. He does not want us to send our money to Israel any more than he wants us to send it to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

that's my point.
 
oh great, just another anti-Semitic supporter of Ron Paul.

and it only took 51 posts to come out.

Anti-Semetic? You sure like to toss labels around guy. Actually, the Palestinians are a Semetic race, so it is the Jews who are the real anti-semites, and of course, people who they hate.
 
Back
Top Bottom