Chariman Obama will run a bullet-proof campaign!

That doesn't even make sense, apdst, since raising taxes the same percent on each bracket will have different effects on each bracket. If you raise it from 35% to 40% on the rich and you raise it from 15% to 20% on the poor, mathematically speaking, you have ****ed the poor almost twice as hard.

The Prophet said:

Judging by the sentiment of the country, and how the GOP feels, (in that he's basically a Carter 2.0) he will be throughly taken for granted in 2012. Never underestimate the ruthlessness of the American left. If they think that their messiah is in hot water and in trouble of being de-throwned, they will pull no punches to defend him. Nobody is safe. For his campaign, Obama just needs to sit back and run continous footage of the GOP foreign policy debates where almost all of the candidates think all Muslims are terrorists and we need to start more wars and enhance the patriot act. No GOP establishment candidate can hope for coming within striking distance of Obama.

Click to expand...

... I find it awkward that a Ron Paul fan who calls himself "The Prophet" and has a picture of Ron Paul as his avatar, has the gull to call Obama "the messiah". Seriously, do you 18th century sycophants think before you open your mouths about other political groups? Although you're a vocal bunch, you're still nothing more than a fringe little group composed on racists, teenagers, conspiracy theorists and Ayn Rand loving lesbians. As I've stated many times before, the reason nobody cares about Ron Paul is because the man is a old fruit who believes things were better when white men were allowed to own slaves and women had to ask men if they could leave the house.

Unlike the rest of the country, Ron Paul hasn't evolved with the times. We live in 2011, most of us don't really give much of a **** about the gold standard, nobody gives much of a **** about repealing the 14th amendment and even less give a **** about reversing legislation which has passed the constitutional muster of people far more educated than Ron Paul.

Now personally, I don't give much of a **** what you call Obama. You've clearly demonstrated that not only are you a political extremist, you're also a racist. You're essentially the stereotypical Ron Paul fan, however before you ridicule and accuse others of doing what you yourself do, please take a second, breathe, and look in the mirror.

Hatuey said:

... I find it awkward that a Ron Paul fan who calls himself "The Prophet" and has a picture of Ron Paul as his avatar, has the gull to call Obama "the messiah". Seriously, do you 18th century sycophants think before you open your mouths about other political groups? Although you're a vocal bunch, you're still nothing more than a fringe little group composed on racists, teenagers, conspiracy theorists and Ayn Rand loving lesbians. As I've stated many times before, the reason nobody cares about Ron Paul is because the man is a old fruit who believes things were better when white men were allowed to own slaves and women had to ask men if they could leave the house.

Unlike the rest of the country, Ron Paul hasn't evolved with the times. We live in 2011, most of us don't really give much of a **** about the gold standard, nobody gives much of a **** about repealing the 14th amendment and even less give a **** about reversing legislation which has passed the constitutional muster of people far more educated than Ron Paul.

Now personally, I don't give much of a **** what you call Obama. You've clearly demonstrated that not only are you a political extremist, you're also a racist. You're essentially the stereotypical Ron Paul fan, however before you ridicule and accuse others of doing what you yourself do, please take a second, breathe, and look in the mirror.

Click to expand...

Nice little diatribe there. If you are through with your rant, I will respond. Ok, number 1. Everyone knows that those on the left are the biggest in-your-face racists there are. They are securing the black race in cast iron shackles, giving them hand outs so they don't work to better themselves. Any black that refuses welfare, and is sucessful, they shout down as an "Uncle Tom." The American left is guilty of the worst crime since slavery- theft of another race of peoples' ambition.

Number 2. Now with that said, how did what I say qualify me of being a racist? Did I use vulgar language to sketch minorities? Stereotypes? What?

I could tell you watch too much Rachel Maddow. " believes things were better when white men were allowed to own slaves and women had to ask men if they could leave the house." Do please support this assertion with evidence. Or else, please concede that you are making it up to make Ron Paul look bad, thanks.

The Prophet said:

Nice little diatribe there. If you are through with your rant, I will respond. Ok, number 1. Everyone knows that those on the left are the biggest in-your-face racists there are. They are securing the black race in cast iron shackles, giving them hand outs so they don't work to better themselves. Any black that refuses welfare, and is sucessful, they shout down as an "Uncle Tom." The American left is guilty of the worst crime since slavery- theft of another race of peoples' ambition.....

Click to expand...

disgusting strawman arguments.

Thunder said:

disgusting strawman arguments.

Click to expand...

I knew it was a matter of time until the peanut gallery threw in their dos centavos. So Hautey, I'm waiting for you to provide evidence for your assertion. You said that

the reason nobody cares about Ron Paul is because the man is a old fruit who believes things were better when white men were allowed to own slaves and women had to ask men if they could leave the house.

Click to expand...

It's not trivial, as I was called out for insisting that Huntsman said he wants to start a war with Pakistan. This is no different. So put up or please shut up.

The Prophet said:

I knew it was a matter of time until the peanut gallery threw in their dos centavos. So Hautey, I'm waiting for you to provide evidence for your assertion. You said that

Click to expand...

Nice little diatribe there. If you are through with your rant, I will respond. Ok, number 1. Everyone knows that those on the left are the biggest in-your-face racists there are. They are securing the black race in cast iron shackles, giving them hand outs so they don't work to better themselves. Any black that refuses welfare, and is succesful, they shout down as an "Uncle Tom." The American left is guilty of the worst crime since slavery- theft of another race of peoples' ambition.

Click to expand...

Your boring attempt at shifting blame is a simple one - I didn't state the left or right was anymore racist, I stated that Ron Paul's group of political marauders is composed of blatant racists like yourself as well as other politically fringe subcultures. Your feigned outrage and intellectually deficient reply is not really fooling anybody.

Number 2. Now with that said, how did what I say qualify me of being a racist? Did I use vulgar language to sketch minorities? Stereotypes? What?

Click to expand...

You want me to post the thread in which you went off on the evil jooz?

I could tell you watch too much Rachel Maddow. " believes things were better when white men were allowed to own slaves and women had to ask men if they could leave the house." Do please support this assertion with evidence. Or else, please concede that you are making it up to make Ron Paul look bad, thanks.

Click to expand...

It's not trivial, as I was called out for insisting that Huntsman said he wants to start a war with Pakistan. This is no different. So put up or please shut up.

Click to expand...

Here you go:

Ron Paul: Ron Paul on how we should listen to the founders on foreign policy,

The Founding Fathers Were Right About Foreign Affairs

In fact, when I mentioned Washington the other guest on the show quickly repeated the tired cliche that "We don't live in George Washington's times." Yet if we accept this argument, what other principles from that era should we discard? Should we give up the First amendment because times have changed? How about the rest of the Bill of Rights? It's hypocritical and childish to dismiss certain founding principles simply because a convenient rationale is needed to justify foolish policies today. The principles enshrined in the Constitution do not change. If anything, today's more complex world cries out for the moral clarity provided by a noninterventionist foreign policy.

Click to expand...

Ron Paul on how the founders would be opposed to a secular government,

The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance. Throughout our nation's history, churches have done what no government can ever do, namely teach morality and civility. Moral and civil individuals are largely governed by their own sense of right and wrong, and hence have little need for external government. This is the real reason the collectivist Left hates religion: Churches as institutions compete with the state for the people's allegiance, and many devout people put their faith in God before their faith in the state. Knowing this, the secularists wage an ongoing war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation's Christian heritage. Christmas itself may soon be a casualty of that war.

Click to expand...

Ron Paul on how he's the only one listening to the founders,

SuperPAC: 'Only Ron Paul listens to our Founding Fathers' - The Hill's Video

In the ad, Revolution SuperPAC targets front-runners Mitt Romney (Mass.) for having his healthcare plan endorsed by President Obama and Gov. Rick Perry (Texas) for forcing “young girls in Texas to be injected with an STD vaccine.”

Posted to the organization’s YouTube page and their website, the ad asks viewers “Want this ad to air in major primary states? Make it possible with a contribution at RevolutionPac.com.” and reminds potential donors “SuperPACs have no contribution limits.”

Click to expand...

Ron Paul returning to the monetary system "envisioned" by the founders

Political positions of Ron Paul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He has also called for the removal of all taxes on gold transactions.[117] He has repeatedly introduced the Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act since 1999,[118] to enable "America to return to the type of monetary system envisioned by our Nation's founders: one where the value of money is consistent because it is tied to a commodity such as gold"; it has received virtually no mainstream news coverage.[119] He opposes dependency on paper fiat money, but also says that there "were some shortcomings of the gold standard of the 19th century ... because it was a fixed price and caused confusion." He argues that hard money, such as backed by gold or silver, would prevent inflation, but adds, "I wouldn't exactly go back on the gold standard but I would legalize the constitution where gold and silver should and could be legal tender, which would restrain the Federal Government from spending and then turning that over to the Federal Reserve and letting the Federal Reserve print the money."[120]

Click to expand...

When you constantly argue for a return to the values and beliefs of the founders, it's because 1) you think the times in which they lived were better than how we are today or 2) you have a fetish for old men in ugly wigs. Personally, I don't give much a **** how much Founding Father dick Ron Paul wants to suck. I and most of this country aren't really all that interested in returning to the conditions of their time or any of the policies they employed in their time.

That brings me to you, the Pauligan Prophet. You complain that Ron Paul is the truth, the light, the whatever and we're all just too blind to see it. It doesn't even dawn on you that the man isn't appealing. It's sacrilege to suggest that he may be wrong because gosh darn it, he loves the Founders! Really though, I called you a racist because your first thread on this forum exposed you for what you are. The entire forum saw it. You can run and hide now but it's pretty clear to everybody here what your real colors are.

Finally, your boring demands for "evidence": Obviously, you're completely unable to understand purposely created hyperbolic statements meant to mock your position and would rather deflect the entire point of the post in order to cry about how Ron Paul isn't really a fringe candidate, however, the reality is that he is and you are just one of his fringe supporters. His policies aren't even endorsed by his own party. So what does that tell you?

:shrug:

PS: Asking ad nauseum for somebody to reply to your post 8 minutes after you originally posted, makes you look like an even bigger troll.

whysoserious said:

That doesn't even make sense, apdst, since raising taxes the same percent on each bracket will have different effects on each bracket. If you raise it from 35% to 40% on the rich and you raise it from 15% to 20% on the poor, mathematically speaking, you have ****ed the poor almost twice as hard.

Click to expand...

Exactly the reason that the Dems won't let the Bush tax cuts expire. Welcome to reality. Besides, poor folks don't pay taxes, anyhow.

Hatuey said:

Your boring attempt at shifting blame is a simple one - I didn't state the left or right was anymore racist, I stated that Ron Paul's group of political marauders is composed of blatant racists like yourself as well as other politically fringe subcultures. Your feigned outrage and intellectually deficient reply is not really fooling anybody.

Click to expand...

I think you'd be extremely hard-pressed to confirm that ALL of Ron Paul supporters are indeed "blatant racists." Talk about a blanket generalization. That's like saying all Muslims are terrorists because a small sect of them are.

You want me to post the thread in which you went off on the evil jooz?

Click to expand...

Well I would answer you, but everytime I speak about the kosher people, I seem to get warnings of infractions from the mods.

Here you go:

Ron Paul: Ron Paul on how we should listen to the founders on foreign policy,

The Founding Fathers Were Right About Foreign Affairs



Ron Paul on how the founders would be opposed to a secular government,



Ron Paul on how he's the only one listening to the founders,

SuperPAC: 'Only Ron Paul listens to our Founding Fathers' - The Hill's Video



Ron Paul returning to the monetary system "envisioned" by the founders

Political positions of Ron Paul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



When you constantly argue for a return to the values and beliefs of the founders, it's because 1) you think the times in which they lived were better than how we are today or 2) you have a fetish for old men in ugly wigs. Personally, I don't give much a **** how much Founding Father dick Ron Paul wants to suck. I and most of this country aren't really all that interested in returning to the conditions of their time or any of the policies they employed in their time.

That brings me to you, the Pauligan Prophet. You complain that Ron Paul is the truth, the light, the whatever and we're all just too blind to see it. It doesn't even dawn on you that the man isn't appealing. It's sacrilege to suggest that he may be wrong because gosh darn it, he loves the Founders! Really though, I called you a racist because your first thread on this forum exposed you for what you are. The entire forum saw it. You can run and hide now but it's pretty clear to everybody here what your real colors are.

Finally, your boring demands for "evidence": Obviously, you're completely unable to understand purposely created hyperbolic statements meant to mock your position and would rather deflect the entire point of the post in order to cry about how Ron Paul isn't really a fringe candidate, however, the reality is that he is and you are just one of his fringe supporters. His policies aren't even endorsed by his own party. So what does that tell you?

:shrug:

PS: Asking ad nauseum for somebody to reply to your post 8 minutes after you originally posted, makes you look like an even bigger troll.

Click to expand...

Awesome! I didn't think it was possible, but I like Ron Paul even more now! Thank you. Ok, now onto your claims:
1. I NEVER said or claimed or even hinted at that Ron Paul is the truth, the light (whatever the hell that means), and I know I never said that everyone is too blind too se it.

2. I know he isn't appealing, we usually vote on who has the best haircut; we are more concerned with packaging then actual substance. But Ron Paul is not the reason why we are following him; it's his ideas that make him who he is, and his ideas are absolutely appealing.

3. I'm sick and tired of the "racist" label. It seems those on this forum are extremely fragile. I never, ever said a negative thing about minorities, only SOME Joos.

The Prophet said:

3. I'm sick and tired of the "racist" label. It seems those on this forum are extremely fragile. I never, ever said a negative thing about minorities, only SOME Joos.

Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:

And you need to knock it off or you will receive a Hate Speech infraction.

apdst said:

What about any of those things are going to get him re-elected?

Click to expand...

Ron Paul is not President, so it's not possible to re-elect him as President, as to his Congressional seat, I'm sure the people who voted for him already know and support all these stance of his.

After he beats Chairman Obama, Will Herr Gingrigh make der schwul wear the pink star?