• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Will Romney Invade Iran?

Well gosh darn it, and then we go and take care of Saddam for them.
I know. I thought it was an odd choice for us to make. Iran couldn't've done it on their own. And we went ahead and let one of the guys who was helping Iran be in charge of dismantling the previous power structure.
 
Well once again no as at the time you gave Saddam weapons and turned a blind eye on his use of chemical weapons...

and the ****er still lost.

Look I'm sorry if historical facts don't jive with your idealogical agenda but unfortunately for you that's the way it is.

we also gave weapons to Iran. In the words of Henry Kissinger, we wanted both sides to lose.
 
They have different goals but I've seen no indication that they are irrational in the sense that they would bring about their own destruction.

that is correct. the part you are missing is they believe they can strike with impunity. A) the West would never retaliate and B) Allah would protect them from any counterstrike from the Zionists, as Iran is central to His plans. So no, they won't take action that they believe would result in the nuclear annihilation of (for example) the Holy Cities of Najaf or Qom. They just also don't believe that nuking Israel would happen to have that result.
 
sounds like you haven't been paying attention to Iran's activities, particularly to their proxies.

I call bull****, let's see your numbers to prove it?

And are we also counting deaths brought about by US proxies???
 
Last edited:
cpwill said:
that is correct. the part you are missing is they believe they can strike with impunity. A) the West would never retaliate and B) Allah would protect them from any counterstrike from the Zionists, as Iran is central to His plans. So no, they won't take action that they believe would result in the nuclear annihilation of (for example) the Holy Cities of Najaf or Qom. They just also don't believe that nuking Israel would happen to have that result.

There is absolutely no indication that Iran is a.) Developing nuclear weapons, or b.) Intends to use them on Israel. This is all completely baseless paranoia.
 
There is absolutely no indication that Iran is a.) Developing nuclear weapons, or b.) Intends to use them on Israel. This is all completely baseless paranoia.


I've never understood the fear shown by some in the most powerful country on the planet.
 
Back
Top Bottom