• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Obama hires lobbyist for 2012 re-election

No one is claiming it is. However, what you are tying it to, the hiring of this guy for his campaign, has exactly jack **** to do with his campaign promise. This is not rocket surgery.
I hope not, since I've never heard of a rocket surgeon. :lamo

There is nothing at all complicated in this. This hiring does not violate his campaign promise. No one is making claims beyond that. No one is saying he has a good record on the promise(he does not). That does not change the fact that you got your facts all ****ed up.
So you're cool with the broken promises and the hiring of lobbyist by Obama. Got it. Let's see what someone else who isn't denying and defending can say about it.
 
But not in this case. What we have is some one made an article, and either expected that people would be too stupid to follow the link he provided, too stupid to understand what was at the link, or he himself was too stupid to understand. Ockham fell for it hook line and sinker.

Basic rule of the internets: always assume some one is lying unless they supply proof, and until you have checked that proof.




I mean... comon... they must think you're stupid! :lamo
 
I hope not, since I've never heard of a rocket surgeon. :lamo

It is one of my favorite running jokes.

rocket-surgery.jpg


So you're cool with the broken promises and the hiring of lobbyist by Obama. Got it. Let's see what someone else who isn't denying and defending can say about it.

Now you are building straw men. I did not claim to be cool with his hiring of lobbyists in his administration. You are trying to twist this in an incredibly dishonest method. This hiring is fine, it does not violate his promise, nor is there anything wrong with it. You got your facts wrong. man up and admit it.
 



I mean... comon... they must think you're stupid! :lamo


Why can't you actually argue against what I am saying? I mean, is it really that ****ing hard? Nothing I have said has been difficult, and yet instead of addressing one single thing I have said, you run around building straw men.
 
Now you are building straw men. I did not claim to be cool with his hiring of lobbyists in his administration.
Yet your claiming it has nothing to do with and you're clearly wrong. See the video I posted from 2007. :shrug:

You are trying to twist this in an incredibly dishonest method. This hiring is fine, it does not violate his promise, nor is there anything wrong with it. You got your facts wrong. man up and admit it.
I'm doing what Obama did - was Obama dishonest about McCain?
 
Why can't you actually argue against what I am saying? I mean, is it really that ****ing hard? Nothing I have said has been difficult, and yet instead of addressing one single thing I have said, you run around building straw men.

You clearly cannot argue this point, since you're dancing around it so much. :shrug:
 
Yet your claiming it has nothing to do with and you're clearly wrong. See the video I posted from 2007. :shrug:

It does have nothing to do with his promise, which I quoted, and which you linked to later. You might want to go back and read the promise again. In fact, it would be a really good idea.

I'm doing what Obama did - was Obama dishonest about McCain?

No you are not. Obama made no claim as to what he would do in the video you provided. He was not lying. You on the other hand, either still have not read the campaign promise, or you are lying.
 
You clearly cannot argue this point, since you're dancing around it so much. :shrug:

I destroyed your point. I addressed it directly in my first post in this thread, and shown where your facts where in error. Nice spin, but you are still failing here.
 
I destroyed your point. I addressed it directly in my first post in this thread, and shown where your facts where in error. Nice spin, but you are still failing here.

You've destroyed your credibility by not addressing the point. The video I just posted put a nail in any sort of defense about "it has nothing to do with the campaign" yet Obama himself did the same thing in 2007. Face it Redress... you're points are a loser. Obama's broken his promise a bunch of times yet you cannot admit that, you cannot admit that his hiring a re-election campaign lobbyist is exactly what he slammed McCain on in 2007, and what he made as his "CHANGE" center piece from his first election.

All your doing in dancing, denying and avoiding. When you've got some substance let me know.
 
You've destroyed your credibility by not addressing the point. The video I just posted put a nail in any sort of defense about "it has nothing to do with the campaign" yet Obama himself did the same thing in 2007.

Obama made to my mind no promise to not hire ex-lobbyinsts for his campaign. Can you show me where he did? You have not yet, so your point is still failing. There is a point you could be making, but you have failed to do that too. Right now the point you are making is not backed up by the evidence you have provided.

Face it Redress... you're points are a loser. Obama's broken his promise a bunch of times yet you cannot admit that

In fact, I have admitted just that. Again, your facts are in error, either intentionally or through ignorance.

you cannot admit that his hiring a re-election campaign lobbyist is exactly what he slammed McCain on in 2007,

I have not denied this. Fail again.

and what he made as his "CHANGE" center piece from his first election.

Nor this, nor does your story prove that he has not provided change. You might be able to make that point, but it would take more than one issue.

All your doing in dancing, denying and avoiding. When you've got some substance let me know.

All I am doing is taking your arguments apart. In my very first post in this thread, I showed how the campaign promise you are referencing has nothing to do with this hiring. What you should have done was admit it and move to a new point instead of harping on the same failed point,
 
It only looks bad to people looking for things to cry about. There is no substance whatsoever to this whine. If this is the best the right has, Obama should win next year easily.

it looks bad to anyone who opposes lobbyists being in close relationships with politicians..

but you are free to dismiss this a merely a "whine" if you want... but it sounds rather partisan/biased on your part to do so.

I'd imagine that it's not just the right who will "whine" ... the left as been pretty openly opposed to lobbyists lately.
 
I hope not, since I've never heard of a rocket surgeon. :lamo

So you're cool with the broken promises and the hiring of lobbyist by Obama. Got it. Let's see what someone else who isn't denying and defending can say about it.

Apparently there are a lot of rocket surgeons who follow their savior. What, Obama lie? Oh, my no..... Say it ain't so Joe!

 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1059901638 said:
Apparently there are a lot of rocket surgeons who follow their savior. What, Obama lie? Oh, my no..... Say it ain't so Joe!



Could you possibly be anymore ****ing redundant?

I mean really?

A politician lying! **** ME IN THE ASS AND CALL ME MITT ROMNEY!
 
Fine with me.
 
Obama made to my mind no promise to not hire ex-lobbyinsts for his campaign. Can you show me where he did? You have not yet, so your point is still failing. There is a point you could be making, but you have failed to do that too. Right now the point you are making is not backed up by the evidence you have provided.



In fact, I have admitted just that. Again, your facts are in error, either intentionally or through ignorance.



I have not denied this. Fail again.



Nor this, nor does your story prove that he has not provided change. You might be able to make that point, but it would take more than one issue.



All I am doing is taking your arguments apart. In my very first post in this thread, I showed how the campaign promise you are referencing has nothing to do with this hiring. What you should have done was admit it and move to a new point instead of harping on the same failed point,

Everything you need to know is said right here (in case you missed it or are just not willing to address it). This is the nail in the coffin of any point you may think you have:

 
Could you possibly be anymore ****ing redundant?

I mean really?

A politician lying! **** ME IN THE ASS AND CALL ME MITT ROMNEY!

Nice to know you're agreeing with me on this one Jet. :peace
 
He discarded this promise a long time ago. If this guy is just another one or not, it's really moot. The promise was long ago broken.
 
He discarded this promise a long time ago. If this guy is just another one or not, it's really moot. The promise was long ago broken.

I never bought into his pledges. I thought they were attempts to suck in the dreamers, who were normally too idealistic and foolish to vote.
 
I never bought into his pledges. I thought they were attempts to suck in the dreamers, who were normally too idealistic and foolish to vote.

I have no problem with those who state that they realize he's simply another lying politician but they liked him more than the other lying politician.
 
I have no problem with those who state that they realize he's simply another lying politician but they liked him more than the other lying politician.

Sometimes it's just the marketing package and a bit of elbow grease to ignore your "stains" and point out the other person's stains.

In any event, it's a non-issue to me regardless of which politician is elected. I'm not even morally guilted about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom