I'm just hypothesizing and speculating based on the evidence like everyone else...including you.
Wrong!
The evidence says one thing, you are saying another. That is not doing the same thing.
Ew boy, here comes the nyuh uhhh, you don't know, neener neener, you're a liar routine...right on cue. <yawn>
Ah... so you already knew you were wrong!
Well, that is a start.
Following is also what stalkers and serial killers do.
Following is what children do.
Following is what adults do.
So ****ing what!
It wasn't illegal.
There was no stalking and there was no serial killing.
You are being absurd.
Trayvon had no idea who the creep following him was, so he started running and so did Zimmerman.
Wrong!
Trayvon took off after circling Zimmerman. Zimmerman said he ran off in a skipping like fashion. That is not running away in fear.
The fact that he came back and circled Zimmerman says he was not scarred.
Learn the damn evidence.
Zimmerman's shortness of breath from running after Trayvon is what tipped the dispatcher off that Zimmerman was following Trayvon..
Zimmerman: <panting>
Dispatcher: Are you following him?
Zimmerman: <panting> Yes.
Wrong again!
That is not a chase, but Zimmerman heading in the same direction he had seen Trayvon go.
That is called following.
And you are hearing what you want to hear. There was no panting.
Nor did Zimmerman run. That is the evidence.
He was going up a slight incline and it was windy.
He was inside the gated community when he first saw Trayvon. He watched him from his SUV and then got out and started following him on foot. Then Trayvon started RUNNING!!!!! Zimmerman said so himself in a recorded call to the dispatcher.
:doh
He said he was with, as he was. He was not on duty that night, but on his way to the store.
Which you do not seem to understand matters not one but.
He broke the rules and started following Trayvon.
And again. They are not rules, but guidelines. Do you really not understand that?
They are not anything that has to be followed. Do you also not understand that?
And because as you were already informed,
"Nor can those guidelines prevent him from acting the way he did, as his actions were legal", he is not beholden to them or can they be used against him.
Or in other words; His being part of NW does not matter one ****ing bit.
Not only do you not know the evidence, you don't know how what you do know applies.
Trayvon had a right to protect himself, too. The deadly threat facing Trayvon was an armed nutball who was following him for no apparent reason. How was Trayvon supposed to know Zimmerman wasn't some pervert or serial killer? Was he supposed to wait until Zimmerman got close enough to do him harm? Or does he stand his ground and become the aggressor instead of the victim. The SYG law says he doesn't have to wait to become a victim, he can stand and defend himself with deadly force (it used to be called reasonable force) if he feels his life in in eminent danger. You could be dead if you waited for an attacker to make the first move.
For Pete's sake. :doh
Way to ignore the evidence.
There was no threat form Zimmerman when Trayvon approached him.
Zimmerman was headed away from him.
There was no reason for Trayvon to attack.
None.
How do you know Trayvon circled Zimmerman?
That is the evidence.
Why did Zimmerman do that? Why didn't he just wait for the police where he was?
Zimmerman already stated why. NOr was he required to wait for the Police so you speculating why he didn't means absolutely nothing.
Trayvon didn't attack him from behind,
I say he approached him from his behind and you reply with he did not attack him from behind?
You are obviously not paying attention.
Sad!
instead he asked Zimmerman to his face, "why are you following me?"
That is actually wrong.
You are acting like he casually walked up to Zimmerman and asked ahis question in a civilized manner.
That did not happen.
Watch the walk-through.
Trayvon came at him from his left rear in a hasty manner yelling his question. When he arrived upon Zimmerman immediately struck him. That is an attack.
It didn't matter what Zimmerman's answer was to his question. It was part of his attack.
Is it possible that Zimmerman was reaching for his gun while he said that and Trayvon saw him and punched him in the nose and tackled him to the ground before Zimmerman could get his gun fully out? Why yes, it is.
Why no it isn't, as it is not part of the evidence.
DeeDee, who Trayvon supposedly told everything to, never mentioned him saying he had a gun.
And she never heard him say anything about a gun in the initial confrontation either.
John Good never saw any gun as he watched them.And he never heard him say help me he has a gun. Nothing.
What you suggest is not in accord with the evidence, nor is it likely considering the evidence.
Trayvon could have been riding on fear since he first saw that he was being followed by Zimmerman. His actions are those of a person defending themselves from a percieved threat ...or a real one such as another person trying to pull a gun on him.
Bs!
Those are not the actions of a person in fear.
A person in fear does not circle you to size you up, and then lay in wait to attack you, or return to attack you from a safe location, after waiting for your back to be towards them.
Those are the only two possibilities in accord with the evidence.
That is an attack.
He approached yelling his question and immediately stuck Zimmerman upon arrival. That is an attack.
Trayvon's actions are not those of a person in fear.