- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You're saying its a matter of your political bias.
Let me explain my comments further... Watch this from ABC News:
You're saying its a matter of your political bias.
Newsflash: That wont change.
**** yo, We always call white people crackers in my community..... its normal and not racist at all.....
I can see why there's confusion.....the list being labeled "following" would to me mean that is a list of the people that account is following. But if that's so, then why are there button next to each name on that list labeled "follow"? If the people on that list are already being followed, wouldn't those buttons say "un-follow"? And if non of the names on that list are being followed, why is the column labeled "following"? Seems like a website page design flaw to me. I can't tell which it's supposed to be, I have to rely on what the lawyers proved or didn't prove, and the plaintiff did not prove she was following anyone.
If it were me, I would not have deleted my twitter right after taking the stand, especially while subject to recall.
It hasn't proven anything. All we have seen is a bunch of speculation.
Without the witness that was closest to the shooting, it's already established that Zimmerman was on the bottom, that he got the crap beat out of him, and that what Zimmerman said about the fight itself seems to be true. Every single witness the state has presented to try and show it didn't happen the way he claims, has been discredited or turned around by the defense. When John takes the stand for the defense, there will be no doubt what so ever that it was Zimmerman on the bottom, and even though nobody can say with certainty who was screaming for help, Martin's father said it wasn't trayvon to police in front of a witness, and the common sense conclusion has to favor Zimmerman based on the beating he suffered.
There is supposed to be some witness who will testify that his wife was watching the television while he was on the computer. He had no idea what his wife was watching, but he heard some screams coming from the TV. He indicated that he told his wife that it sounded like George screaming then asked what she was watching, when she responded it was the news. I can't recall who this supposed witness was, and we'll have to see what the cross is, but that sounds pretty powerful.
I got that second paragraph wrong buck, so I deleted it.
As for what you said, I'm not sure
I believe I heard that on HLNTV, but I am not positive. I would assume that person will be called by the defense. I edited my reply to take into account your change.
I have never called a white person a cracker, in fact I'm surprised that someone Martin's age would use the term but I have no problem refusing to damn a dead kid for his characterization of his eventual killer.
I'm not in my account. I don't have an account. I'm looking an inactive pic someone else posted. Thanks for the explanation though.If she was in her account looking at her list of who she was following, it would say "following" on all of them. You aren't her. You aren't in her account. You are in your account. Therefore, the "follow" button is for YOU, not her. It's for YOU to choose if you want to follow that person.
The most damaging testimony from Jenna Lauer.
She couldn't identify Zimmerman( who she had known ) from the picture the cops showed her, taken right after the incident. Because of the beating he took.
Obvioulsy consistent the defense's theory of self-defense.
It looks to me like he's thinking of the best way to word the next question.
At this point, can you really believe that there
is one person on that jury that thinks
Z is guilty and has no resonable doubt?
There is supposed to be some witness who will testify that his wife was watching the television while he was on the computer. He had no idea what his wife was watching, but he heard some screams coming from the TV. He indicated that he told his wife that it sounded like George screaming then asked what she was watching, when she responded it was the news. I can't recall who this supposed witness was, and we'll have to see what the cross is, but that sounds pretty powerful.
i'm an old fart, and my memory is weak,so recognize that when reading the following
my recollection is that west was the one who presented this during opening arguments
someone who knew george overheard the screams on the tv news his wife was watching
he purportedly immediately recognized those screams to be those of zimmerman
possibly, we may hear more about this when the defense calls its witnesses
I have never called a white person a cracker, in fact I'm surprised that someone Martin's age would use the term but I have no problem refusing to damn a dead kid for his characterization of his eventual killer.
No one is asking you to damn the kid. We're asking you to damn the use of racial slurs. And you refuse.
Plenty of white kids have used the word 'nigger' to characterize their eventual killers, you don't see anyone (herein) using that to justify racial bigotry.
You're using a dead kid for your own purpose, to condone racial slurs and thus promote hatred. That's sad.
My question, will the defense call Zimmerman as a witness and then try to impeach him? His stories conflict more than any witness called thus far lol.
No one is asking you to damn the kid. We're asking you to damn the use of racial slurs. And you refuse.
Plenty of white kids have used the word 'nigger' to characterize their eventual killers, you don't see anyone (herein) using that to justify racial bigotry.
You're using a dead kid for your own purpose, to condone racial slurs and thus promote hatred. That's sad.
You are claiming that every white kid who uses the N word is killed?
Do YOU use the epithet?
Plenty of white kids have used the word 'nigger' to characterize their eventual killers
You are claiming that every white kid who uses the N word is killed?
Do YOU use the epithet?
My family hasn't used it in three generations. Its considered uncouth.