LLMPapa knox the **** off the cardboard BS "expert"[W; 398]

Excon said:

How sad that you can't debate the evidence and instead resort to ad homs.
I have no buddies over at CT.
So how about answering the question I posed to you.

Just how many people do you believe are lying in this case?
Because out everything you have presented thus far, the only ones it appears as though you haven't accused of lying, are the prosecutors and their investigators, and of course DumDum who is the only one who has been proven to have lied.
So how many is it?​

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

If you can't count then you have to go back to preschool and start over. I'm not here to spoon feed you with silver spoon. At least I presented material evidence of witness discrepancies that you people couldn't deal with and so you had to resort to ad hom attack.

But, you people accuse just about every one else on the Trayvon side of conspiracy and liars without presenting any evidence. In Deedee's case, her discrepancies are immaterial to zimmerman's case except her credibility.

Click to expand...

Excon said:

Look at you running from what you previously indicated.
iLOL
This is hilarious.

And no, you did not provide any relevant discrepancies.

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

If you can't count then you have to go back to preschool and start over. I'm not here to spoon feed you with silver spoon. At least I presented material evidence of witness discrepancies that you people couldn't deal with and so you had to resort to ad hom attack.

But, you people accuse just about every one else on the Trayvon side of conspiracy and liars without presenting any evidence. In Deedee's case, her discrepancies are immaterial to zimmerman's case except her credibility.

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

You are the one trying so hard to evade to run away.

I provided the relevant discrepancies in this thread:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimmerman-martin-case/154886-llmpapa-knox-off-cardboard-bs-expert.html

Some specific posts were linked in this post:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...ystem-criticizes-media-19.html#post1061690540

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

You have provided no evidence..... that contradicts or shows a significant difference in Z's version of events.

You are dismissed

Click to expand...

Excon said:

Stop telling untruths. You are the running from being wrong.

And stop being deceitful. You did not point to any meaningful discrepancies in either of the above.

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

As always, you have no argument but sticking your head in the sand whenever fact and evidence were presented to you all the time.

The contradictions and discrepancies in zimmerman's accounts are no longer debatable but a done deal fact despite your denial. Now, go dismiss yourself.

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

Why are you so unwilling to face the truth? Are you shellie in disguise? I know shellie would twist and turn everything around and bold face lie, even in court of law, just to get zimmerman out of the bind at all cost.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

What evidence have you shown to disprove Z's version?

Make a list of *said evidence*.....not what, the **** you *think*, but what you can prove

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

You are just repeating the same old same old "show me the evidence" when they had been shown to you ad nauseam. It's tiresome.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

It gets tiresome for you because you can't produce it

You have no evidence to prove wrong Z's version

If you have, the evidence then prove me wrong and make me look like an embarrassed fool and I'll leave these forums out of shame

Go on.....show the evidence.

Click to expand...

Excon said:

What truth is that?
That make believe **** you spew? Is that what you think is the truth.
Got news for you pal. It is all in your head.
iLOL

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

All the posts providing the evidence with repetitious argument over the same ol same ol evidence and what do you do? That's right, stick your head in the sand.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

You don't have **** and you know it

You have NO EVIDENCE to counter Z's testimony

You have ZERO credibility

Dismissed

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

Coming from you, who cares? Go ahead and make a fool out of yourself and dismiss yourself... I ain't wasting no time with you here.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

Ahhh, now you want to run? lol

Produce the evidence, that nails Z's coffin

You have a brilliant opportunity to bitch slap all Z supporters...right here/right now, dude

Go ahead!

Click to expand...

sharon said:

The evidencehas been available to everyone for months... and George is his own worst enemy.. contradicting himself.. But, up until last July George would do and say anything for attention and donations. Since then he has packed on over 100 pounds.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

If the evidence has been available for months *lol* then you should have no problem producing it

Show me, the evidence that refutes Z's version

On Z contradicting himself.....List the so-called *contradictions* that affect, the totality of Z's version of events.

Click to expand...

sharon said:

Many members have linked the evidence for you repeatedly... Its trolling to keep asking for the same things over and over again.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

Ahhh, now you want to run? lol

Produce the evidence, that nails Z's coffin

You have a brilliant opportunity to bitch slap all Z supporters...right here/right now, dude

Go ahead!

Click to expand...

dolphinocean said:

You are not only a flaming troll but downright dishonest to say the least.

You pretend that no one in this forum has ever produced any evidence to counter or proved zimmerman's version wrong. So, you go around taunting just about every poster who is favorable to Trayvon's side to "Produce the evidence, that nails Z's coffin".

That's deplorable because it's not true.


Your motive is not to debate but to ridicule and attack the person by falsely claiming he has provided no evidence but now want to run.


Not that you don't know, just look around and click on any recent thread from this year alone and you would find hundreds of posts providing evidence and counter evidence using not just the forensic evidence but also zimmerman's very contradictory accounts that nailed his own coffin.


This case had been debated since March 19, 2012 when the story first broke.

Your incessant question of "What evidence have you shown to disprove Z's version?" had been asked many times since then and was answered in the first three months of debate in this forum since the breaking news. Then it had been debated ad nauseam for another six months when more evidence in the case had been released.


By now you want to pretend nobody had provided any evidence to counter zimmerman's stories? You are outright dishonest in throwing around your incessant inane questions that had long become stale and molded and you act like your rotten stuffs are still good for your chow.


Here is the link to the first thread of the heated debate starting from the breaking news in March 19, 2012:


http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...orhood-watch-volunteer-feel-betrayed-law.html


Here are some of those that followed after the first thread and subsequent threads that also quickly reached its 2000 posts mark:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimmerman-martin-case/122058-witness-martin-attacked-zimmerman.html


http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...99-witness-martin-attacked-zimmerman-2-a.html


http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...-shows-no-blood-bruises-george-zimmerman.html


http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...-arent-zimmermans-cries-911-tape-experts.html


http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...rs-offer-reward-capture-george-zimmerman.html


And this year 2013 we continue to debate on the same ol evidence you're asking day in and day out the same old questions to just about everybody who is on Trayvon's side. Just click on any thread and you will find other people providing evidence you keep asking for.

And just go through the following thread and you will find my recent ones here, starting with LLMpapa's video of forensic evidence that tore zimmerman's version to shreds:


http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimmerman-martin-case/154886-llmpapa-knox-off-cardboard-bs-expert.html




Now, you want more, go to my blog site where I dealt with zimmerman's case with fact and evidence to counter zimmerman's self-defense claim:


dolphinocean | A voice crying out for justice for Trayvon Benjamin Martin killed in the hand of George Zimmerman


Not that you haven't seen nor engaged yourself in such evidence debate, you just didn't agree or accept what had been presented to you countless time. You chose to dismiss and ignore all the evidence against zimmerman, even zimmerman's very own contradiction that nailed his own coffin.

You can disagree and refuse to accept any evidence provided to you but just be honest about it and state honestly you disagree and refuse to accept your opponent's presentation of argument based on fact and evidence but don't try to lies and knowingly make a false claim against your opponent that:

"You have no evidence to prove wrong Z's version".


You have NO EVIDENCE to counter Z's testimony


You don't have **** and you know it


You have no evidence to prove wrong Z's version


You have ZERO credibility


Ahhh, now you want to run? lol'


Produce the evidence, that nails Z's coffin
​

Pretending your opponent has produced no evidence when it is not true and you know it and then concluding that your opponent has no credibility and wants to run is a very deplorable behavior. That's why I don't want to waste my time engaging people like you with such a dishonorable behavior.

Click to expand...

ric27 said:

Take a hint...

You keep throwing ignorant, unfounded theories and rampant speculation..... you simply cannot prove.

Have you read, the warrant for Z's arrest? Ya know, the one that charges Z with M2

Do you understand it? If so.....what does it say?

I'll tell ya...

It does not prove Z was the aggressor

It also does not disprove Z acted in self-defense or was in *fear* of serious bodily harm or death

No witnesses or evidence to refute that M broke Z's nose and slammed his head into concrete

No witnesses or evidence that says Z had an opportunity to free himself and avoid killing M in self defense

No evidence/witnesses that Z was about to physically attack M

No evidence that M was in fear

I could go on and on ......

Btw -Do you know what, the standard jury instructions on M2 in Florida are?

Now, where's your evidence to refute Z's testimony?

Click to expand...