ric27
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 7,541
- Reaction score
- 3,195
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Theres no solid evidence he ****ed up and killed that kid.
There is also NO solid evidence he DIDN'T **** up and kill that kid.
The burden to prove a murder was committed, and by whom, rests solely with the prosecution. You gotta understand this simple principle
You know what....I'll tell you a little secret
I believe OJ committed the murders with which he was charged and I also believe Casey Anthony killed her daughter but you need to have a fundamental understanding of how our jury system is supposed to work.
A verdict of not guilty is not the same thing as a finding of factual innocence. It just means that the state did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
In Z's case, you said
Theres no solid evidence he ****ed up and killed that kid.
Now, do the math