• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

FBI to George Zimmerman: "We don't have to give you our files"

and still you add another layer...The answers you seek have already been answered. You're too busy trying to ridicule your way out of your initial error to have noticed.

and with this, I'll allow you the last word you've so desperately shown you need...

:yawn:

Again, I say good day.

OMara has been singing the same refrain for months and months... he claims the prosecution isn't turning over evidence in a timely manner.

If you go to GZlegal .com you'll see that he's spending more time blogging and doing PR than anything else.... and he has hired 6 interns to scour the web.. I think he is in the weeds with this case.
 
OMara has been singing the same refrain for months and months... he claims the prosecution isn't turning over evidence in a timely manner.

If you go to GZlegal .com you'll see that he's spending more time blogging and doing PR than anything else.... and he has hired 6 interns to scour the web.. I think he is in the weeds with this case.
Just stop with your nonsense.
What's that?
You don't think it nonsense?
Well then provide evidence that he is spending more time on his blog about it than actually doing other.

Come on sharon, prove it. Prove it or just stop with the nonsense.
 
OP:

Well - at first I thought that it was typical FBI BS . . . and they were out of line.

But then it occurred to me that if they're pursuing their own case - releasing any of the evidence they've procured might compromise their own efforts/case.

A few weeks after the slaying, following protest rallies across the country, the U.S. Department of Justice launched an investigation into the shooting to determine whether Trayvon's civil rights were violated — whether he was killed because he was black.
 
OP:

Well - at first I thought that it was typical FBI BS . . . and they were out of line.

But then it occurred to me that if they're pursuing their own case - releasing any of the evidence they've procured might compromise their own efforts/case.
And if you check further you would see that they are not pursuing any charges.
 
And if you check further you would see that they are not pursuing any charges.

Not *yet* but they might -
It's not clear what that investigation has turned up. The FBI, which has done much of the work in the federal case, has said the investigation is ongoing.
(from the article)

They're still investigating.
 
Not *yet* but they might - (from the article)

They're still investigating.
What do yo mean "not yet".
They already said they were not pursuing any charges long ago.
 
What do yo mean "not yet".
They already said they were not pursuing any charges long ago.

What do you want to debate? According to the CURRENT ARTICLE in the op their investigation is still ONGOING

You just don't seem to like that very much :roll:
 
What do you want to debate? According to the CURRENT ARTICLE in the op their investigation is still ONGOING

You just don't seem to like that very much :roll:
I read that. Yet they already said that Zimmerman is not a racist and that there wasn't any racial profiling.
So there could be no civil rights violations.
Now if you want to debate that go ahead.
It wont change the fact that there will be no charges from that which does not exist. Regardless if their investigation is still open and ongoing.
 
I read that. Yet they already said that Zimmerman is not a racist and that there wasn't any racial profiling.
So there could be no civil rights violations.
Now if you want to debate that go ahead.
It wont change the fact that there will be no charges from that which does not exist. Regardless if their investigation is still open and ongoing.


No evidence presented.
 
Back
Top Bottom