• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donations

Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

The right to a speedy trial would suggest the defense is involved in the foot dragging, but admittedly I have not really followed this case.

Actually it's a 2 part issue....

The preparation for, the hearing before trial (SYG) and, the trial itself to be decided by the jury *if it goes that far*
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

From the Orlando Sentinal: “the fund has spent $40,000 on purchases for O’Mara’s law firm, for example more computers, office space, phones, and software.

Some of those things are being used by six interns working on the case, according to the defense fund website.”

(Omara said they would need another million dollars for GZ's defense.)
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

From the Orlando Sentinal: “the fund has spent $40,000 on purchases for O’Mara’s law firm, for example more computers, office space, phones, and software.

Some of those things are being used by six interns working on the case, according to the defense fund website.”

(Omara said they would need another million dollars for GZ's defense.)

Believe it or not that's rather cheap in today's standards
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

Believe it or not that's rather cheap in today's standards

They are saying they have 75 depositions to take..
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

They are saying they have 75 depositions to take..

Clear indication that they found something in TM's past that they can use at trial. Or so Sharlogic goes.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

Choke hold/strangle financially.....forcing an innocent to plea. In this case *plea to manslaughter*
Iirc, it was the defense who has asked for the extensions, not the prosecution.
I am not sure that O'Mara is trying to force his client to plea.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

George was really offensive and fake in that interview.
No he really wasn't.


OMara may have committed professional suicide taking on GZ.

He has nothing to gain but everything to loose. He should have taken more that two hours to take this case 'pro bono'!
:doh:doh:doh
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

Iirc, it was the defense who has asked for the extensions, not the prosecution.
I am not sure that O'Mara is trying to force his client to plea.

He already did ask for more time according to the O Sentinel this afternoon.

George will weigh 400 pounds by then and run up huge living expenses.. OMara will be running like his hair was on fire.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

It is official, Zimmerman is one huge fattie:lamo

Oh, and he is also broke.

They can still get the state to pay for his defense, but probably not his personal expenses.

George Zimmerman legal defense fund: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donations - OrlandoSentinel.com

Defense attorney Mark O'Mara today said that he and client George Zimmerman have spent their way through more than $300,000 in donations and are desperate for more funds.

"The case is out of money," he said.

The defense cannot move forward, for example retain needed experts, without more cash, he said.

He and Zimmerman need about $30,000 a month, according to his website. The defense fund's balance is currently less than $5,000, he said.


O'Mara revamped a website, explaining where all that money has gone.

The stress of the case has caused Zimmerman to gain 105 pounds, O'Mara said today.

So far, it has raised more than $314,099.17, O'Mara revealed today. He and co-counsel Don West have not been paid, he said.

I'm not sure I can cheer on anyone going busted for seeking competent legal defense.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

The right to a speedy trial would suggest the defense is involved in the foot dragging, but admittedly I have not really followed this case.
As defense has to counter what the state presents, I wouldn't call it foot dragging.
And the prosecution knows this and utilizes that same time to bolster their case when it should already have been finalized.

I wouldn't read anything into any defense waiving the right to trial, as it really has become nothing but procedural.
I have even seen a judge threaten to hold it against the defendant if they didn't waive their "right", only to see the prosecutor stall and stall for more time as he wasn't prepared. But since the defendant had (cough) waived their "right", it didn't matter one bit.





Iirc, it was the defense who has asked for the extensions, not the prosecution.
And?
Do you think the prosecution doesn't take advantage of that time?

I am not sure that O'Mara is trying to force his client to plea.
That would be the prosecution trying to force those things.
 
Last edited:
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

As defense has to counter what the state presents, I wouldn't call it foot dragging.
And the defense knows this and utilizes that same time to bolster their case when it should already have been finalized.

I wouldn't read anything into any defense waiving the right to trial, as it really has become nothing but procedural.
I have even seen a judge threaten to hold it against the defendant if they didn't waive their "right", only to see the prosecutor stall and stall for more time as he wasn't prepared. But since the defendant had (cough) waived their "right", it didn't matter one bit.

The only times I have done it is because the prosecutor agreed otherwise the judge wouldn't have allowed it and then it was only because of some late turn of events. If I had some late new evidence or evidence that took time to gather that called the charge into question when I did those cases, my hard as nails DA would look at it and investigate it. He would sometimes basically turn the police detectives into my investigators. He was no-nonsense fire and brimstone, but if there was something that showed probable innocence, he'd explore it and drop the charge and never take the case to trial. He had no interest in prosecuting someone who reasonably appeared to be innocent.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

The only times I have done it is because the prosecutor agreed otherwise the judge wouldn't have allowed it and then it was only because of some late turn of events. If I had some late new evidence or evidence that took time to gather that called the charge into question when I did those cases, my hard as nails DA would look at it and investigate it. He would sometimes basically turn the police detectives into my investigators. He was no-nonsense fire and brimstone, but if there was something that showed probable innocence, he'd explore it and drop the charge and never take the case to trial. He had no interest in prosecuting someone who reasonably appeared to be innocent.
Sounds like he was a stand up kind of guy.

I also see no problem with it if it is legitimate.
But do have a problem with it if it has become procedural as it has in many places.

It is funny how different States comply with requirements, as well as Judges. Sometimes that difference is even noticeable between jurisdictions of the same State.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

Sounds like he was a stand up kind of guy.

I also see no problem with it if it is legitimate.
But do have a problem with it if it has become procedural as it has in many places.

It is funny how different States comply with requirements, as well as Judges. Sometimes that difference is even noticeable between jurisdictions of the same State.

He was a huge pain in the ass, but a straight shooter. Unfortunately the guy who replaced him is.....well I have no respect for him and I will leave it at that.

Yeah, even in my area there is a wide variety. The older prosecutors are pretty stand up people to the facts and the law. The younger ones seem to have a more adversarial antagonistic "win at all cost" mentality.
 
Last edited:
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

I really don't have much interest in the case, but are you saying the funds were abused?

No the money was well spent...

Try spending $36k in 18 days and tell me that is not abusing money donated for your legal defense:lamo
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

No the money was well spent...

Try spending $36k in 18 days and tell me that is not abusing money donated for your legal defense:lamo

Here'S THEIR ACCOUNTING.

How Has Money Been Spent?
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

No the money was well spent...

Try spending $36k in 18 days and tell me that is not abusing money donated for your legal defense:lamo
So you have nothing saying it is. :doh

And as wwe have already been over his spending when he did it. We already know that it wasn't abuse.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

So you have nothing saying it is. :doh

And as wwe have already been over his spending when he did it. We already know that it wasn't abuse.

How Has Money Been Spent?

If $61,747.54 sounds like a lot of money for living expenses for 8 months -- you are right. It’s more than most people earn in a year.

:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

The primary element necessary to prevail in a civil Wrongful Prosecution suit, after being found innocent, is Improper Motive on the part of the prosecutor.

That hair brained prosecutor better pray that Dershowitz is wrong and she can prove 2nd Degree Murder.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

How Has Money Been Spent?

If $61,747.54 sounds like a lot of money for living expenses for 8 months -- you are right. It’s more than most people earn in a year.
:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo
What you "think" sounds like, does not necessarily mean that it is. Duh!
That is why they further explain it.

As you have not shown that it is abuse, you have nothing. As usual.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

If $61,747.54 sounds like a lot of money for living expenses for 8 months -- you are right. It’s more than most people earn in a year.

:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo

your link goes on to justify that amount

If $61,747.54 sounds like a lot of money for living expenses for 8 months -- you are right. It’s more than most people earn in a year. Most of George’s living expenses for the first several months were allocated to providing a safe, secure place for George and his wife, Shellie, to live.

Until George’s bond was revoked on June 1, he was living in a mobile home, out of state. It was a very secure location, and the intent was for George to make that his primary residence until his trial, and there were some expenses incurred to ensure the home was suitable for George and his wife, (including $2,500 to run a phone line to the house so he could meet his court-ordered bond requirements).

When the Court set a second bond on July 5, one of the conditions was that George had to stay within Seminole County. George had to abandon the home that he set up out of state.

Once in Seminole County, George found finding a secure home difficult. The defense team worked hard to find someone willing to rent to George Zimmerman because there was a perceived liability associated with renting to him, and there was a concern that George would have to abandon that residence too, if circumstances were to change. During this time, George and Shellie lived in a series of modest hotels -- mostly two-room extended stay suites. This cost the Defense Fund several thousands per month.

By the end of September, acceptable living arrangements were made, and the rent is reasonable. With luck, and if the location of the home is not discovered by the public, George and Shellie should be able to remain there until trial.
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

Iirc, it was the defense who has asked for the extensions, not the prosecution.
I am not sure that O'Mara is trying to force his client to plea.

No need to be a smartass

[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Whether the defendant is in custody or not plays a center role. It tends to delay it or speed it up[/FONT]
 
Re: O'Mara: We've spent $300,000 on George Zimmerman and are desperate for more donat

your link goes on to justify that amount

Justify?

Justify?

Justify?

Justify?

:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo

Yes, they justify his abuse of the funds.
 
Back
Top Bottom