• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Undeniable Objective Evidence

hawke812 said:
He is talking about the forensics, reports, etc. That is why he is calling the officers as defense witnesses. Come on too easy man:lol:
Click to expand...

"And you know this....how?"

Back at ya...
 
hawke812 said:
The purpose of this thread is to show the Zimmerman supporters objective evidence is NOT in his favor. I have seen many claim the evidence is solid for GZ and the case should have been thrown out. I will look for more information about how the evidence supports the prosecution's case.

Mark O'Mara told CNN the attacks on Zimmerman's credibility will pale in comparison to the undeniable objective evidence.

Some highlights from the video:

  • Forensic Evidence
  • Witness #18 stated GZ shot TM from the top
  • FDLE report
  • Medical report states "no stitches needed."


Undeniable - YouTube

I believe some of the attacks on his credibility are derived from the evidence. O'Mara trying to separate the two.
Click to expand...

If it's on YouTube it must be true!

:failpail:
 
hawke812 said:
A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.

Yes, you did fail:lol:
Click to expand...

Keep believing everything you see on YouTube! It is indicative of your intellectual plateau! LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom