That is never really discussed but is relevant.
1. Why did TM approach GZ the first time, then run seeing GZ on the phone?
2. Why did TM then double back at GZ after GZ got off the phone?
Neither of those are ever discussed on these topics. I've asked why before. They'll just divert to the same-same-same they post on every other topic.
Simple enough.
That is never really discussed but is relevant.
1. Why did TM approach GZ the first time, then run seeing GZ on the phone?
2. Why did TM then double back at GZ after GZ got off the phone?
Neither of those are ever discussed on these topics. I've asked why before. They'll just divert to the same-same-same they post on every other topic.
Joko...I don't remember GZ saying the events happened like that when talking to the dispatcher. Did I miss something? Don't start throwing rocks at me. I don't have an opinion of guilt or innocence. Way too early for me to grasp.
How could he have seen a cellphone in the dark in the rain through tinted windows when George stated he stood a car length away?
#1 yes, that was his police call as taped. TM coming towards GZ and GZ saying TM looked like he was trouble, then TM running - with the police asking GZ if he was following. That all recorded in GZ's phone call. The verbal and face-toface conflict came after GZ was off the phone.
Since it is entirely improbably that pudgy GZ could not have run down TM (TM clearly would have been too fast to catch), I think that makes #2 a logical conclusion, or at least a likelihood.
I've distanced myself from M/Z threads, so I may be behind the curve. But I'll tell you this:
Zimmerman would have scared me if I were out walking in the dark at night. While I believe he was just trying to "keep eyes" on Martin, the appearance to Martin could easily have been that he was being stalked. I try to put my head into the head of a black teenager -- and I come up with, pure and simple, he was afraid.
EDIT: If you read this originally, before my edit, the first word was "Martin." WRONG!!! And edited to be what I meant to say.
But the shooting happened a good ways from GZ's truck. GZ said that TM was checking him out while he was sitting in his truck...did he not?
Yes, and that GZ came towards him intimidatingly and then suddenly turned and ran.
GZ continued his conversation saying TM had disappeared and GZ got off the phone saying he'll phone back letting the police know exactly where to meet him. I think all logic says that TM was not then proceeding to home at that point or he would have been home. That GZ could not physically have run down TM if TM was fleeing.
So TM either 1.) stopped and waited for GZ or 2.) turned and approached GZ - with GZ now not on the phone. GZ was not on the phone when that happened.
So... back to the OP. WHY did TM initially approach GZ's truck while GZ was on the phone? Why did TM then suddenly turn and run out of sight? Why then, with GZ off the phone, did TM come back into the open waiting for GZ or to approach GZ?
There is no question that GZ was going along the sidewalk trying to see where TM ran off to as reason GZ was away from his truck. Trying to see where TM ran off to is not exactly chasing someone or even following, rather trying to observe.
Sorry, Joko. I'm pretty confused about the chain of events. I guess I need to re-listen to the 911 and review the video of him during a polygraph test. I hear what you are saying, but something seems out of place.
I've distanced myself from M/Z threads, so I may be behind the curve. But I'll tell you this:
Zimmerman would have scared me if I were out walking in the dark at night. While I believe he was just trying to "keep eyes" on Martin, the appearance to Martin could easily have been that he was being stalked. I try to put my head into the head of a black teenager -- and I come up with, pure and simple, he was afraid.
EDIT: If you read this originally, before my edit, the first word was "Martin." WRONG!!! And edited to be what I meant to say.
Simple enough.
Would it have killed George to just leave Martin alone and let the police handle it?
Simple enough.
That is never really discussed but is relevant.
1. Why did TM approach GZ the first time, then run seeing GZ on the phone?
2. Why did TM then double back at GZ after GZ got off the phone?
Neither of those are ever discussed on these topics. I've asked why before. They'll just divert to the same-same-same they post on every other topic.
That is never really discussed but is relevant.
1. Why did TM approach GZ the first time, then run seeing GZ on the phone?
2. Why did TM then double back at GZ after GZ got off the phone?
Neither of those are ever discussed on these topics. I've asked why before. They'll just divert to the same-same-same they post on every other topic.
#1 yes, that was his police call as taped. TM coming towards GZ and GZ saying TM looked like he was trouble, then TM running - with the police asking GZ if he was following. That all recorded in GZ's phone call. The verbal and face-toface conflict came after GZ was off the phone.
Since it is entirely improbably that pudgy GZ could not have run down TM (TM clearly would have been too fast to catch), I think that makes #2 a logical conclusion, or at least a likelihood.
If he was afraid, why didn't he call the police from his cell, or go to a neighbors house and ask for help? The evidence shows that he doubled back. Why would he do that if he was scared?
I don't believe it was dark, near dusk but not dark yet.
I don't know - why did George pursue Martin on foot when dispatch told him not to do so? Why did he take a gun with him on patrol?
:shrug: So many questions - no real believable answers that explain any of it.
I don't get why everyone is trying to break down the 'middle' actions - the 'responses to the fight' and 'just to kill to protect self' when there are so many questionable events that took place beforehand.
Would it have killed George to just leave Martin alone and let the police handle it?