• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Sympathy for Martins' parents?

OscarB63 said:
Here's what we know:

Trayvon was left home alone with the 13 y/o son of his father's gf

Trayvon made no calls to his mother or father

Trayvon's father did not know where he was or where he had gone (one article quoted him as assuming TM had gone to a movie with a cousin)

So we may not "know" , but we can be 99.9% sure he did not ask permission....unless he asked the 13 y/o
Click to expand...

Exactly, you support one article which fits your agenda, but ignore/pull the "we don't know" card on another article when it does not fit your agenda. Stop being so obvious:roll:
 
joko104 said:
See Oscar's comment above. We do not know if TM asked permission and since his father didn't know where he was or went this is another example of the father changing his story to suit his goal of getting $$$ from TM's death - and saying anything trying to get it.
Click to expand...

See above-You support one article which fits your agenda, but ignore/pull the "we don't know" card on another article when it does not fit your agenda. Stop being so obvious:roll:
 
hawke812 said:
Exactly, you support one article which fits your agenda, but ignore/pull the "we don't know" card on another article when it does not fit your agenda. Stop being so obvious:roll:
Click to expand...

You are just arguing to argue.
 
joko104 said:
You are just arguing to argue.
Click to expand...

I pointed out how you (and others) tend to cherry-pick the information that best fits your agenda. The second I pointed it out, you start backpedaling with the "we don't know" line. Stop being so biased:roll:
 
hawke812 said:
I pointed out how you (and others) tend to cherry-pick the information that best fits your agenda. The second I pointed it out, you start backpedaling with the "we don't know" line. Stop being so biased:roll:
Click to expand...

No, because there is supporting evidence for some of it and not the other. I didn't backpedal. You're confusing me with another member. This isn't the bus driver argument.
 
4Horsemen said:
you drip. go read your own racist comments. I was just slapping you upside the head with a just as ignornat retort. you mad?

good!
Click to expand...

You'll last long here.
 
joko104 said:
No, because there is supporting evidence for some of it and not the other. I didn't backpedal. You're confusing me with another member. This isn't the bus driver argument.
Click to expand...

You just used the same methods in this discussion. In the article you linked, it states TM "begged his dad to go to the store". I point it out, then you claim "we don't know" if he did or not. You use some of the articles' information that fits your agenda, then ignore the information that does not fit your agenda.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom