- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Both men are black. I don't see how this is a civil rights case.
Since you have insisted that GZ should have remained totally financially broker, I presume your writing that he should have hired a lawyer is your laughing and sneering at him for not being wealthy like you. Lawyers aren't free.
So respond to me. How long do you expect it will take blood from a gushing head wound (head wounds bleed profusely) to end up in his face? If you say anything other then a couple of seconds you are lying.
Both men are black. I don't see how this is a civil rights case.
That's about it, yeah. It can't be about race when both people have the same race.You don't think a black person can commit an act of racism against another black person? Are you serious?
I don't know what you mean "financially broker"...
George could have shut up and asked for a lawyer.. The State would be obliged to get him a public defender.
George didn't want a lawyer because GZ is so smart.. and for several days he was one of them.. having the run of SPD and being the center of attention.
No son of mine (or brother) would have been so stupid.. as to trade off a rational defense for momentary celebrity.
That's about it, yeah. It can't be about race when both people have the same race.
A typo. George Zimmerman was broke.
You are just upset because GZ was able to post bond and is not having to rely on a politically elected public defender in the same political party as the prosecutor and the judge.
Nearly all people charged with murder who remain silent and use a PA are found guilty. It was only when the president declared that this was a race issue and GZ killed his surrogate son - plus they started firing and demoting officers who claimed the evidence did not support prosecution that he was even charged - and then the DA had to refuse to allow a grand jury to review that case.
I know.. George only shot Trayvon because TM said he was going to kill him.. Right?
Problem is that the physical evidence begins to add up. TM wasn't trying to kill George, he was trying to restrain George.. And for while he did so successfully because he had a longer reach.
I think that after GZ shot Trayvon he had an "oh sh**" moment.. when he knew he had killed an unarmed teen.. and he hastily constructed a justification.
You say he had gushing head wounds.
His doctor stated no head trauma.
Was he bleeding from his head? Did the first responder indicate his head was covered in blood? Do head wounds not bleed very badly? Are you seriously trying to argue that Z did not have a badly bleeding head wound?
Like I said, T supporters ignore the facts they don't like and invent ones friendly to their agenda.
One must understand what civil rights means before criticizing the Sentinel.
You say he had gushing head wounds.
His doctor stated no head trauma.
Like I said, GZ supporters ignore facts they don't like.
It is quite simple. No head trauma means blood was not gushing from his head as you falsely claimed.
No, his "doctor" never said any such thing. That is just a lie repeated over and over and over.
You say he had gushing head wounds.
His doctor stated no head trauma.
Like I said, GZ supporters ignore facts they don't like.
It is quite simple. No head trauma means blood was not gushing from his head as you falsely claimed.
As a typical T supporter, just change the facts to what you like. Z clearly had a wound to his head and that wound was bleeding profusely, as most, if not all, head wounds will do and as evidenced by the first responder who indicated under oath that Z's head was covered with blood. But, again, as most T supporters are wont to do, feel free to just ignore the known facts.
wound[SUP]1[/SUP] (wnd) n. 1. An injury, especially one in which the skin or another external surface is torn, pierced, cut, or otherwise broken.
wound - definition of wound by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
A typo. George Zimmerman was broke.
You are just upset because GZ was able to post bond and is not having to rely on a politically elected public defender in the same political party as the prosecutor and the judge.
Nearly all people charged with murder who remain silent and use a PA are found guilty. It was only when the president declared that this was a race issue and GZ killed his surrogate son - plus they started firing and demoting officers who claimed the evidence did not support prosecution that he was even charged - and then the DA had to refuse to allow a grand jury to review that case.
No, his "doctor" never said any such thing. That is just a lie repeated over and over and over.
You say he had gushing head wounds.
His doctor stated no head trauma.
Like I said, GZ supporters ignore the facts they don't like and invent ones friendly to their agenda.
That was awesome! Now all you have to do is show where I said he didn't have any head wounds.
So then... Z had a heavily bleeding head wound (as almost all head wounds are). How long does it take for the blood from such a head wound to end up in an indivduals face? How about the few seconds that Z stated he was on top of T. Yes, that is all it would take.
You said he had a gushing head wound. It wasn't even close to that.
It was a gushing head wound. Even the EMT guy said his head was about 50% covered with blood and would probably need stitches, while under oath. How do you think he had all that blood on his head if his wound was not bleeding profusely?
Why bother quoting a post only to ignore the contents?
Unsubscribing. Have a good day.