• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Look at this insane compilation of data

I guess everyone needs a hobby. :)
 
http://www.axiomamnesia.com/Videos/T...rd_florida.mp4

Ha.. that worked.. The air Marshall is at the end of the surveillance video. 2/26 Why would the prosecutor's want this? Note how dark it is at 6:37 PM 2/26.
iLOL
No it didn't!
:doh

And when you get there.
Note that it is "Dusk", a more accurate description. :)

And I would love to clue you in on how those glaring lights can effect the way the background appears.
But since it doesn't matter to the argument, there is no need to educate you.



And since you are still having problems posting the link, let me help you out, again.
http://axiomamnesia.com/Videos/Tray...ank_surveillance_02262012_sanford_florida.mp4
 
Here is a thought on dusk/dark and any video clips taken.
You have to look at the camera specifications and what settings were when the recording was made. What it records may not be a true indicator of light conditions.

For example I watched a golf match a few years ago on tv. It was getting late (after sunset). From the TV camera with the aperature more open, it looked like there was quite a bit of dayllight left. Then the camera closed the lense down, and the announcer stated this is what the golfers are seeing. It was amazing how much darker it was. The course was barely visable.

My point, be carefull when you are using camera recordings as a basis for how light or dark it is.
 
I'm a bit peeved. Why in the hell did it take Simon so long to post this resource? you're getting freaking lazy on us man.
 
I'm a bit peeved. Why in the hell did it take Simon so long to post this resource? you're getting freaking lazy on us man.
You prob'ly have no idea of how lazy in comparison to other times.

I am totally quarter-assing this case. It's just for fun.
My initial urges sent to get all the official data etc. and that is only half-assed.

But, like I said, I have stopped getting the dumps even though I am still on FL's mailing list.

I can't vouch for this guys accuracy, but he makes some nice correlations between bits and pieces and provides the info about how to double check him.

If you find anything interesting to you, you can check it out for yourself and see if he's right or stretching it.
 
You prob'ly have no idea of how lazy in comparison to other times.

I am totally quarter-assing this case. It's just for fun.
My initial urges sent to get all the official data etc. and that is only half-assed.

But, like I said, I have stopped getting the dumps even though I am still on FL's mailing list.

I can't vouch for this guys accuracy, but he makes some nice correlations between bits and pieces and provides the info about how to double check him.

If you find anything interesting to you, you can check it out for yourself and see if he's right or stretching it.

One item I saw was it appeared he was claiming GZ was on patrol in his vehicle. I read through it quickly but if that is accurate it makes one wonder why GZ would say he was only going to the store.

I briefly looked for a call timeline and didn't see one but did see where he pointed out Dee's testimony matches GZ's call on TM being at the mailboxes just before running.
 
He promotes a theory that GZ did more driving around watching TM than GZ lets on.

I really haven't taken the time to really read what's there. I just thought it was nice that he shows where the cameras were looking and where in the footage the incidents take place and takes multiple items and tries to put them together into a single timeline narrative.
 
Whenever an association is attempting to enforce a provision in the governing documents, any ambiguity will be construed against the association.

Condo and HOA Law: governing documents

The head of an HOA watchdog group told the Sentinel: "They should have ... disallowed members from running around with guns. If you don't put out guidelines, you are in deep doo-doo if something happens."

Homeowners May Have to Pay in a Trayvon Civil Action - Wrongful Death - Injured

An interview with 3 members of the association defending Zimmerman - when asked if they knew if he had a gun - 2 said no, 1 said YES.

Massachusetts Local News - MassLive.com

He had to take a class with other volunteers, where he says deputies told them to never chase a suspect. They aren't allowed to carry weapons. They aren't even allowed to get out of their cars.

Policy of caution guides Neighborhood Watch groups - Tampa Bay Times

In an HOA meeting some weeks prior to Zimmerman's shooting of Trayvon Martin, another resident of the community was kicked out of the meeting because he complained that Zimmerman was profiling him. This strongly implies to me that the HOA knew and approved of what Zimmerman was doing:

George Zimmerman Neighbors Complained About Aggressive Tactics Before Trayvon Martin Killing

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At an emergency homeowner’s association meeting on March 1, “one man was escorted out because he openly expressed his frustration because he had previously contacted the Sanford Police Department about Zimmerman approaching him and even coming to his home,” the resident wrote in an email to HuffPost. “It was also made known that there had been several complaints about George Zimmerman and his tactics" in his neighborhood watch captain role.

The meeting was attended by Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee, the detective assigned to the investigation and an unnamed member of the city council, according to the homeowner’s association newsletter


. George Zimmerman Neighbors Complained About Aggressive Tactics Before Trayvon Martin Killing
 
He promotes a theory that GZ did more driving around watching TM than GZ lets on.

I really haven't taken the time to really read what's there. I just thought it was nice that he shows where the cameras were looking and where in the footage the incidents take place and takes multiple items and tries to put them together into a single timeline narrative.

I was looking at the camera references and it doesn't seem the images are clear enough to distinguish between vehicles so how does he do that? Is he assuming it is the same vehicle he sees?
 
Back
Top Bottom