• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Prosecutor releases new Zimmerman evidence

Posts like this really help show why people should not be assumed to have the necessary capital to discuss issues.

What evidence do you have to demonstrate Z's depraved mind that's needed for a second degree murder conviction?

What do you have besides bull**** hot air?
 
i will wait for you to show us where GEORGE zimmerman lied to the court about his financial condition

Since you won't accept his own lawyer admitting why should you believe me over him?
 
What evidence do you have to demonstrate Z's depraved mind that's needed for a second degree murder conviction?

What do you have besides bull**** hot air?

You can't even admit GZ referenced TM as an asshole. I don't think there is much chance for you to be honest about other facts.
 
You can't even admit GZ referenced TM as an asshole. I don't think there is much chance for you to be honest about other facts.

What evidence do you have to demonstrate Z's depraved mind that's needed for a second degree murder conviction?

Lets see how honest you are :)
 
What evidence do you have to demonstrate Z's depraved mind that's needed for a second degree murder conviction?

Lets see how honest you are :)

You can't even admit GZ referenced TM as an asshole. I don't think there is much chance for you to be honest about other facts.
 
You can't even admit GZ referenced TM as an asshole. I don't think there is much chance for you to be honest about other facts.

You can't because, you don't have squat....nada

You're simply grasping at straws

We have produce evidence from the police accounts, videos and witness statements supporting his version of events, including conflicting witness assertions like DeeDee's, pics of his injuries, and his lawful ccw permit, etc, etc, etc

You have shown nothing of importance....no evidence whatsoever just variations on Z's multiple versions that does nothing to contradict or affect Z's whole version of events.
 
You can't because, you don't have squat....nada

You're simply grasping at straws

We have produce evidence from the police accounts, videos and witness statements supporting his version of events, including conflicting witness assertions like DeeDee's, pics of his injuries, and his lawful ccw permit, etc, etc, etc

You have shown nothing of importance....no evidence whatsoever just variations on Z's multiple versions that does nothing to contradict or affect Z's whole version of events.

After GZ is convicted be sure to send him all your posts and explain you don't know what happened.
 
After GZ is convicted be sure to send him all your posts and explain you don't know what happened.

Rather brash attitude considering, the state does not have any evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict Z on any charge because you would have posted that evidence by now......not mere allegations


Makes you look completely ridiculous
 
if the Zimmerman-supporters can't even meet us on that, there isn't much hope.

and you (ie. TM supporters) pick on the smallest of things.
Guess in your whole life you (TM supporters) have not used a off word during any event in your life?

Ok, GZ used a couple of explict deletes regarding the TM incident.

So I will ask you (TM) supporters to meet me half way in admitting TM action added to the esculation of the event. ex. throwing punches.
If not there is not much hope in rational discussion. by the way I stand in saying GZ may or may not be guilty. The trial will sort it out. I can accept whatever verdict. Can you?
 
What evidence do you have to demonstrate Z's depraved mind that's needed for a second degree murder conviction?

What do you have besides bull**** hot air?

Ok, pretend I'm a prosecuter going for murder 2.

I need "depraved mind".

IF Z said "****ing goons", as in a local black gang that wears hoodies.

And IF the jury can be convinced that "these assholes always get away", in context included M in the subset of "assholes who always get away", then it might be possible to claim that Z was of "depraved mind" because he was operating on the assumption that M was a member of a local criminal gang whose members always get away.

Or something along those lines.

ANY and EVERY inconsistency in Zs various statements will be brought forth and analysed. Every second of Zs actions during the 911 call will be accounted for.

The only chance the prosecution has is to throw doubt on Zs veracity.

I think a LOT of things that folks in the Z camp are dismissing as irrelevant are going to end up being closely examined.

I think Z would be screwed in a bunch of other states, but not florida.

That said, the "hard" parts of the timeline, that pinpoint certain moments and locations combined with Zs statements and reenactment, may cause some distress in some jurors.

That's why I'm expecting a hung jury as opposed to an outright acquittal.

Or some low form of negligent manslaughter.

Cuz in Florida you can say you ****ed a guys mama at her funeral and if her son starts whoopin your ass you can shoot him. So it follows you can scare a kid so bad being a halfwit Barney Fife that he punches you in the face and wrestles you to the ground and as long as he's on top of you so you can't retreat and youre "afraid" you can shoot him and walk.
 
Ok, pretend I'm a prosecuter going for murder 2.

I need "depraved mind".

IF Z said "****ing goons", as in a local black gang that wears hoodies.

And IF the jury can be convinced that "these assholes always get away", in context included M in the subset of "assholes who always get away", then it might be possible to claim that Z was of "depraved mind" because he was operating on the assumption that M was a member of a local criminal gang whose members always get away.

Or something along those lines.

ANY and EVERY inconsistency in Zs various statements will be brought forth and analysed. Every second of Zs actions during the 911 call will be accounted for.

The only chance the prosecution has is to throw doubt on Zs veracity.

I think a LOT of things that folks in the Z camp are dismissing as irrelevant are going to end up being closely examined.

I think Z would be screwed in a bunch of other states, but not florida.

That said, the "hard" parts of the timeline, that pinpoint certain moments and locations combined with Zs statements and reenactment, may cause some distress in some jurors.

That's why I'm expecting a hung jury as opposed to an outright acquittal.

Or some low form of negligent manslaughter.

Cuz in Florida you can say you ****ed a guys mama at her funeral and if her son starts whoopin your ass you can shoot him. So it follows you can scare a kid so bad being a halfwit Barney Fife that he punches you in the face and wrestles you to the ground and as long as he's on top of you so you can't retreat and youre "afraid" you can shoot him and walk.

Interesting point you made about the Goon Gang.. Emmanuel Isiah Burgess also lived on Retreat View Circle.

When the police caught with Emmanuel he had property stolen in Retreat burglaries. Do you suppose half wit Barney Fife considered that Emanuel's four chums may have been responsible for ALL 7 burglaries?
 
Back
Top Bottom