• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Written Statement/Written Confession

Furiounova said:
Apparently it is against the rules to accuse people of being socks so you seek ways to skirt the rules. hilarious

any chance you will address the OP?
Click to expand...
Stop asking ridiculous questions and pay attention to that which has been said about the op.
That should help you out a lot.
 
Furiounova said:
Okay. I didn't expect you to honestly address the facts in the OP anyways.
Click to expand...
But they are consistent.
Just because you do not understand that, doesn't mean they aren't.
 
Furiounova said:
Can you elaborate? not sure what you are asking.
Click to expand...
There's not much to elaborate on. You claimed X, the facts prove Y:
Furiounova said:
12. Claims he told a witness after the gunshot he had already called the cops. (witness states he asked for the cops to be called)
Click to expand...
You're saying that Mr. Zimmerman had not called the cops at all. That is a lie. Mr. Zimmerman had already called the cops, and here's the call, listen for yourself:



Your thread about irregularities, has irregularities.
 
I find it peculiar that he starts his narrative in August 2011. Not saying I know what that means or that it has any meaning.
But merely that it seem pretty weird to me to start your story of events of February with details of some other event that happened 6 months ago.

:shrug:
 
Jerry said:
There's not much to elaborate on. You claimed X, the facts prove Y:

You're saying that Mr. Zimmerman had not called the cops at all. That is a lie. Mr. Zimmerman had already called the cops, and here's the call, listen for yourself:



Your thread about irregularities, has irregularities.
Click to expand...


I never said he didn't call the cops. The OP compares his written statement to his recorded call to......the cops!! lol
 
And we know what all the evidence adds up to.



Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."​



Which is something that all the Traybots refuse to admit.
We do know what the evidence says in toto.


So this crap that you are bringing up does not cast doubt on Zimmerman's account.
And some people just can't see that.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
I find it peculiar that he starts his narrative in August 2011. Not saying I know what that means or that it has any meaning.
But merely that it seem pretty weird to me to start your story of events of February with details of some other event that happened 6 months ago.

:shrug:
Click to expand...

He was trying to conceal how he racially profiled TM and this is also the reason he said he couldn't give dispatch a description of of the "suspect."

Serino highlighted how he called the cops on only blacks from the time he moved there in 2009.
 
Last edited:
Jerry said:
You're saying Mr. Zimmerman did NOT call the non-emergency number to report a suspicious person before he and no_limit_nigga were even close to eachother.
I mean, we've had threads and threads all about the call. Why are you ignoring it?
Click to expand...
I think that point of that one is the discrepancy between George Saying to call the cops and George saying not to call the cops, not about whether George had already called the cops rather than an assertion tha GZ didn't call the cops.

But imho, the witness may have missed a single word or two from GZ sentence and it would get scrambled like that. This is one of the throwaway points.
It may mean something, it may not, but it'll never be the kind of thing that is strong to support an inference being made from it. imho.
 
Furiounova said:
You are missing the point. In his statement he claims he told someone he had already called the cops but at least one witness stated GZ asked for the cops to be called.
Click to expand...

Ok....and?
 
Simon W. Moon said:
I find it peculiar that he starts his narrative in August 2011. Not saying I know what that means or that it has any meaning.
But merely that it seem pretty weird to me to start your story of events of February with details of some other event that happened 6 months ago.

:shrug:
Click to expand...
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
 
Excon said:
And we know what all the evidence adds up to.



Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."​



Which is something that all the Traybots refuse to admit.
We do know what the evidence says in toto.


So this crap that you are bringing up does not cast doubt on Zimmerman's account.
And some people just can't see that.
Click to expand...

Are you ever going to address the facts in the OP?
 
Furiounova said:
He was trying to conceal how he racially profiled TM and this is also the reason he said he couldn't give dispatch a description of of the "suspect."

Serino highlighted how he called the cops on only blacks from the time he moved there in 2009.
Click to expand...
You know that, like our President, Mr. Zimmerman is black, don't you?

You put your foot in your mouth every time you even hint at racial profiling. It's absurd.
 
Jerry said:
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
Click to expand...

We ALL know why you use NLN.
 
Jerry said:
You know that, like our President, Mr. Zimmerman is black, don't you?

You put your foot in your mouth every time you even hint at racial profiling. It's absurd.
Click to expand...

because him calling the cops on only blacks from when he moved there in 2009 doesn't show a pattern.....
 
Furiounova said:
He was trying to conceal how he racially profiled TM and this is also the reason he said he couldn't give dispatch a description of of the "suspect."

Serino highlighted how he called the cops on only blacks from the time he moved there in 2009.
Click to expand...


More desperate race baiting. When all else fails, cry "RACISM!"

It turned out that GZ was exactly accurate about TM. In fact, GZ understated it. TM was an asshole and f...ing punk, and there was many things not right about TM.

Of course, YOU say the reason TM was a violent, criminal, ignorant bully because he was African-American - but then that is just more racism on your part. Everyone who fixates on the race of TM is a racist. Your doing so is your deeply rooted racism.

Why are so many Trayvon Martin advocates such intense racists? I guess that is because TM was a racist himself.
 
Last edited:
What Serino said is that all evidence supports GZ's claim and there is no basis for a prosecution.
 
Jerry said:
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
Click to expand...

some folks use the term "nolimitnigga" because its a passive-aggresive way of calling Trayvon Martin and other black people "nigger".
 
joko104 said:
More desperate race baiting. When all else fails, cry "RACISM!"

It turned out that GZ was exactly accurate about TM. In fact, GZ understated it. TM was an asshole and f...ing punk, and there was many things not right about TM.

Of course, YOU say the reason TM was a violent, criminal, ignorant bully because he was African-American - but then that is just more racism on your part. Everyone who fixates on the race of TM is a racist. Your doing so is your deeply rooted racism.
Click to expand...

LOLOLOLOL.. Facts are meaningless for you.... George believed that the burglaries were commited by young black men.. and he did profile Trayvon.. The problem is that George didn't wait for the police... and it turns out George was wrong.

Is GZ racist? Who knows? What is known is that George got carried away.
 
I do note that in the written statement he goes for the name of the street he was on and in the re-enactment he goes for an address of a street that he was not on. I don't think that those two things are really compatible imho.

Either you are going to another street to get an address of where you are not because you don't know the name of the street you are on [why tf that makes sense to do idk.] The re-enactment version
Or he was going to find the street sign of the street that he was on by going somewhere that there was no street sign. The written version

Both versions are kind of dodgy. The fact that there are two versions which are both dodgy is dodgier still, imho.

He didn't actually have the conversations with NEN that he says he had. At least not afaict. GZ seems to have embellished quite a bit on that count.
GZ attributes a lot to NEN that NEN never seems to say.
It's pretty much NEN's fault that GZ was out of his vehicle in the first place it seems according to the written statement.


Oh ****! GZ is a moron. He thinks that the NEN told him not to follow TM. What an idiot. Everybody knows that NEN said that they didn't need GZ to do that.
Only a moron would think that those two things could be considered equivalent to one another. There'a huge galaxy of difference between "We don't need you to do that," and telling GZ not to follow TM. Sheesh. However could he get that idea? He must be a Zimmerman hater.

; ) lol



In the written statement GZ is punched and then he "fell backward onto [his] back."
This is different from the re-enactment version where there's the additional scuffling and travelling before he somehow ends up on the ground. He doesn't seem as sure of how he got there in the re-enactment as he does in the written statement.
 
Jerry said:
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
Click to expand...
I am sure that's all connected in some way in your head. But from outside, the connections not all that clear.
 
joko104 said:
What Serino said is that all evidence supports GZ's claim and there is no basis for a prosecution.
Click to expand...
Is he also the guy who recommended that charges brought? Is he the same Serino?
 
Thunder said:
some folks use the term "nolimitnigga" because its a passive-aggresive way of calling Trayvon Martin and other black people "nigger".
Click to expand...
I think they do it mostly to bait other posters.
imho
ymmv
 
joko104 said:
More desperate race baiting. When all else fails, cry "RACISM!"

It turned out that GZ was exactly accurate about TM. In fact, GZ understated it. TM was an asshole and f...ing punk, and there was many things not right about TM.

Of course, YOU say the reason TM was a violent, criminal, ignorant bully because he was African-American - but then that is just more racism on your part. Everyone who fixates on the race of TM is a racist. Your doing so is your deeply rooted racism.

Why are so many Trayvon Martin advocates such intense racists? I guess that is because TM was a racist himself.
Click to expand...

I feel sorry for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom