• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Zimmerman can do no wrong/has done no wrong? [W:191]

lol

First of all.
It may not even make it to a Jury.

Secondly, what I said regarding a "showing" is accurate. It is part of the legal process that this case will wind it's way through.

Which makes you comment meaningless.

Right, you know everything - even more about the definitions of words than Merriam-Webster. I'm going to laugh so hard when your "predictions" fall on their face.
 
Right, you know everything - even more about the definitions of words than Merriam-Webster. I'm going to laugh so hard when your "predictions" fall on their face.
Trying to twist what really happened is not in your favor.
The accuracy of the definitions won out.
Not you and your misreading of them.
 
Trying to twist what really happened is not in your favor.
The accuracy of the definitions won out.
Not you and your misreading of them.

to show our integrity & honesty, we provided MANY definitions of the term "stalk".

and yet, you guys have rejected ALL of them.

even better, you guys even reject the use of the term "pursue".

you guys can handwave away all the words you like, it doesn't make your argument any less failed.
 
Trying to twist what really happened is not in your favor.
The accuracy of the definitions won out.
Not you and your misreading of them.

You're style of arguing is simply saying "Wrong". No one thinks it works but you.

I could do this all nigh, but I have better things to do tonight. But have no fear, I"ll be back on soon to make sure everyone sees how bad your arguments are.
 
You're style of arguing is simply saying "Wrong". No one thinks it works but you.

I could do this all nigh, but I have better things to do tonight. But have no fear, I"ll be back on soon to make sure everyone sees how bad your arguments are.
lol
All they will see are pathetic attempts by you to misdirect and your misreading of the information provided.
 
to show our integrity & honesty, we provided MANY definitions of the term "stalk".

and yet, you guys have rejected ALL of them.

even better, you guys even reject the use of the term "pursue".

you guys can handwave away all the words you like, it doesn't make your argument any less failed.
The definitions for "stalk/stalking" and "pursue" were rejected because they do not apply.
It isn't rocket science.
They didn't apply.
 
you forgot to mention calling things "lies"...without saying how

and calling folks "liar"..without saying why
Still lying I see.
I have always have said why. I just don't need to repeat what is already known in every post.

Duh!



apprently for some folks it is, as several of them DID apply.
lol
:doh
None of them applied.
 
Still lying I see.
I have always have said why. I just don't need to repeat what is already known in every post.....

ironic...I know, but its highly dishonest to accuse someone of lying or calling someone a liar, without saying how & why.

every time.
 
ironic...I know, but its highly dishonest to accuse someone of lying or calling someone a liar, without saying how & why.

every time.
You lied. And it was explained how/why.
You lied.
 
you're failure to even attempt to show how & why, is very dishonest.

Now you are purposely lying.

An explanation was given.

What the **** do you call this?
"I have always have said why. I just don't need to repeat what is already known in every post."
That explains how and why you were wrong.


So stop lying.
 
...
"I have always have said why. I just don't need to repeat what is already known in every post."
That explains how and why you were wrong....

actually no, it doesn't.

it shows an unwillingness to support accusations of lies, which is itself, dishonest.

fatigue is no excuse.
 
actually no, it doesn't.

it shows an unwillingness to support accusations of lies, which is itself, dishonest.

fatigue is no excuse.
Holy ****!

You are so far gone it isn't even funny anymore.

What you said was nonsense.

I supported what I said. You just don't like it because it was accurate.
What you said was a lie.
 
unsupported accusations of lies, from you....means it's most likely true.
See!

It was already supported. So you continue to lie.
In most people's books, that is called being pathetic.


So how about you stop lying and get back on topic?
 
more baseless accusations of lying huh?
Said the liar.

It was already backed up previously.

And like I said, I do not need to keep repeating it in every reply.
 
Back
Top Bottom