• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Zimmerman gave instructions in phone call with his wife, records show

Doesn't matter.



There is a big difference between your claimed, "Basic Necessities", and "Living Expenses" that the funds were to be used for.

So don't get those two items confused.

They paid off their credit cards AND spent $5,000.. Not that I care.

Evidently people are still sending them money.... From their jailhouse phone calls, the Zimmermans are pleased and happy.
 
if they purposefully conspire to make sure all transactions are $9,900 so as specifically to avoid IRS oversight, that may be a crime.

No.. its NOT a crime unless the money was from a criminal enterprise.

All it shows is mens rea.. The Zims are quite ignorant and poorly educated.. so even when they think they are being clever, they are in the wrong.
 
They paid off their credit cards AND spent $5,000.. Not that I care.

Evidently people are still sending them money.... From their jailhouse phone calls, the Zimmermans are pleased and happy.
Actually he sounds muted and withdrawn.
 
For what as been made public, neither of the Zimmermans did anything illegal about the money nor committed perjury. I think it probably has been many decades since a people (defendants) have been treated as corruptly and wrongly with a clear conspiracy between the judge, the DA and the government.
 
Actually he sounds muted and withdrawn.


That is the likely reason the DA, judge and Obama's DOJ decided they had to arrest his wife and get Zimmerman back in jail. In that phone call Zimmerman was trying to be upbeat and hopeful. This ran contrary to all the attempts to create such dispair and desperation in Zimmerman that he would agree to anything they offer. Since his wife was a source of comfort and clearly he cares about her, they arrested and jailed her to be able to add extorting into a plea to sacrifice for her. That is not a rare government tactic.
 
For what as been made public, neither of the Zimmermans did anything illegal about the money nor committed perjury. I think it probably has been many decades since a people (defendants) have been treated as corruptly and wrongly with a clear conspiracy between the judge, the DA and the government.
Stop whinning, joko. It's futile crying over the spoiled milk.
 
Stop whinning, joko. It's futile crying over the spoiled milk.


There's far, far more crying over the dead felony assailant who some wished had succeeded in murder instead, isn't there? All the words you write aren't going to bring him back to life, rage and cry as you wish.

It is interesting seeing some who pretend to be "liberal" and progress cheer such extreme denials of due process and constitutional rights - because they hate the Defendant.

Name any case, ever, anywhere, where the judge ordered a condition of release on bail that the Defendant remain unemployed and incomeless while on bail? Any case, anytime, anywhere.

Maybe courts should do that to ALL poor people. Order everyone arrested to have lost their job and can never get another, have no income at all, until 1.) they plead guilty or 2.) are found not guilty in trial months or a year or two later. That could eliminate 99% of trials, wouldn't it? Or maybe rather than homeless and starvation, the court should make a condition of bail that Defendants spouses and children will be beaten every day until pleaing guilty or months later found not-guilty.

Who here agrees that a Judge should or may order a condition of bond that the Defendant be and remain unemployed the entire time while out on bail, to have ZERO income as an order of the court?

Do you Thunder? Sharon? Dolphinwhatever?

What about black defendants in Mississippi? I bet none of those judges (or judges anywhere) thought of that weapon against Defendants before. Just totally starve them and their family out. This noob criminal judge has created the perfect means to force bad-guys to plea guilty. Just totally starve them out, evict them, make them homeless, take away all their food.

That's OK with you, even the right thing to do, right?

As for me, I can't find that language in the Bill Of Rights guaranteeing the right to post bail. Please quote it for me.
 
Last edited:
NO.. you are misunderstanding.. If the money were illicit.. laundered money or stolen money or drug money... There is NO penalty for moving legal money.
FAQs Regarding Reporting Cash Payments of Over $10,000 (Form 8300)
As long as not more than $10,000 is moved every 24 hours, they don't need to fill out a form 8300.
That's true, but...


Structuring

31 USC § 5324 - STRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS TO EVADE REPORTING REQUIREMENT PROHIBITED
 
Last edited:
joko104 said:
...the judge ordered a condition of release on bail that the Defendant remain unemployed and incomeless while on bail?
You have claimed that this judge ordered this bond condition for GZ numerous times.

May I refer you back to this request of a a couple of days ago.
(If you've already answered, I apologize. I looked, but I must have missed it.)

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimmerman-martin-case/128874-video-george-zimmermans-reenactment-trayvon-martin-shooting-47.html#post1060618901
 
Why are you trying to inject something that clearly doesn't apply?
Eight transactions was it? Totaling 135K.
That should be an indicator that they didn't structure their transactions to avoid ****.
You are just injecting more silliness, of the meaningless variety, to the discussion.
I am not sure how to help explain this one.
What was the reason they didn't take the money out in one chunk?
To avoid having to file paperwork.
 
You have claimed that this judge ordered this bond condition for GZ numerous times.

May I refer you back to this request of a a couple of days ago.
(If you've already answered, I apologize. I looked, but I must have missed it.)

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimmerman-martin-case/128874-video-george-zimmermans-reenactment-trayvon-martin-shooting-47.html#post1060618901


I did a quick search and can't find it. I'll try again later. I know at first they were keeping all the terms secret and even discussing all terms after his release.

I'll see if I can find it.
 
I am not sure how to help explain this one.
What was the reason they didn't take the money out in one chunk?
To avoid having to file paperwork.
lol

I don't know ho to make it any more clear for you. Break the damn numbers down.

If they were purposely avoiding, they wouldn't have had transactions above the threshold of the limit. Duh!
 
Back
Top Bottom