Thread: Autopsy: Drug THC found in Trayvon Martin's system[W:22, 576]

Originally Posted by Catawba

That is why he is charged with 2nd degree murder and not first degree murder.

He was nice enough to attempt to ask for 911 guidance in shooting an unarmed teenager...

2nd is nice enough I guess....

Originally Posted by j-mac

It has been covered ad nauseam....



You don't even know what the eye witness reported, yet I am the one with no idea? pfft. Yeah ok...go back and review the threads.....Thanks.

j-mac

So this is just the long way of you admitting you don't have any proof?

Originally Posted by GJ Flash

I haven't heard anyone say "Martin deserved it". I've read posts regarding his character, which is fair. We want all the facts, don't we?

I agree, it's ridiculous that this case seems to divide down party lines. One side wants to hear all the facts and let Zimmerman get his day in court, the other side wants to lynch the white* authority figure* from the tallest tree. Like yesterday.

Yeah. Ridiculous.

Zimmerman has no chance it's the needle or a psych ward for him...
As for SYG laws it seems standing your ground involves stalking chasing and killing people... when they try to defend themselves from people stalking and chasing them... and then assuming a crime...

This case doesnt have 5 minutes... it's absolutely whack from every legal direction that matters.
The paint says on this case that a right to a gun is a right to stalk and murder.
This is a joke.

Originally Posted by GJ Flash

I haven't heard anyone say "Martin deserved it". I've read posts regarding his character, which is fair. We want all the facts, don't we?

I agree, it's ridiculous that this case seems to divide down party lines. One side wants to hear all the facts and let Zimmerman get his day in court, the other side wants to lynch the white* authority figure* from the tallest tree. Like yesterday.

Yeah. Ridiculous.

You haven't read much then. Just on this thread people have cited that he did illegal things (smoke weed) and that it was his fault for not going back to his house. Others falsely claim to know that Martin assaulted Zimmerman, which is hilarious since there is absolutely zero evidence as to who began assaulting who.

Originally Posted by Flippinfunky

It's not my job to do your homework ... You can google "George Zimmerman criminal record" and see what you find... I believe FOX news even has something about it...also Criminal records are a matter of public record, go search Zimmerman's criminal record yourself... or, are you too scared?

Too scared? Are you for real? In Z's criminal background I see few dropped, or dismissed charges. They mean nothing, probably won't even be admissible. But I understand for purposes of character assassination totally relevant eh?

As to his medical history, go look that up too... his lawyers have commented on it as well as his criminal record... guess they're FOS too, eh?

No, I didn't say they were...Good God...All I asked was was the frequency of side effects were, since you seem to be hanging your hat on them....I say watch the trial, I'd be surprised if they even make it in....

j-mac

Originally Posted by whysoserious

You haven't read much then. Just on this thread people have cited that he did illegal things (smoke weed) and that it was his fault for not going back to his house. Others falsely claim to know that Martin assaulted Zimmerman, which is hilarious since there is absolutely zero evidence as to who began assaulting who.

Oh no... they'll attempt to defend murder of a black minor by all sorts of means...

They don't think Iran wants to nuke them because they're good people.

Originally Posted by whysoserious

You haven't read much then. Just on this thread people have cited that he did illegal things (smoke weed) and that it was his fault for not going back to his house. Others falsely claim to know that Martin assaulted Zimmerman, which is hilarious since there is absolutely zero evidence as to who began assaulting who.

Well, we do not know all of the evidence yet, that means neither do you. So, we are both going on media reports, and based on that, Z's statement is the only evidence we have....

j-mac

Originally Posted by j-mac

Well, we do not know all of the evidence yet, that means neither do you. So, we are both going on media reports, and based on that, Z's statement is the only evidence we have....

j-mac

LOL so you are going to defend the defendant with the defendant's statement? Good idea! This is ****ing classic.

By the way, I'm not making claims. You are. Well, I've made a claim:

That we can't be sure who started the fight. I think you are getting me confused with you. You are making wild, baseless claims. I am sitting here laughing and pointing out how ridiculous it is that you pretend to know what happened.

Originally Posted by j-mac

Well, we do not know all of the evidence yet, that means neither do you. So, we are both going on media reports, and based on that, Z's statement is the only evidence we have....

j-mac

and up to now, Zim's version seems to check out and in this instance it is used to determine whether a person is telling the truth

Originally Posted by j-mac

Well, we do not know all of the evidence yet, that means neither do you. So, we are both going on media reports, and based on that, Z's statement is the only evidence we have....

j-mac

And trust the murderer why?