
Don't know about elsewhere, but here in SD we went over 17 years without a single "bad shoot".
Two that I know of certainly were debateable. I've seen some bad, ****ed up **** done by cops, and I've seen them lie their asses off on the stand. And no one that I know of has EVER been satisfied when challenging police behavior through the "proper channels".
So without some kind of data to back up your position, I will remain skeptical.
Anyone wondering what I'm talking about start here:
The Psychology of Persuasion

Anyone wondering what I'm talking about start here:
The Psychology of Persuasion





The ghost of Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2012
If you like "INSANE", then follow me on my blog.



I doubt Zimmerman will testify. I also doubt it will be a fair trial and anticipate the judge quashing most of the defense questions and lines of defense. Plus Zimmerman has really crappy attorneys that seem primarily motivated by fear. Afterall, they are up against the PRESIDENT of the United States, The US DOJ, the State Attorney General, and the judge - meaning both political parties gunning for Zimmerman.
If it were a level playing field, then I would say it would be up to jury selection.