• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Autopsy Results Show Trayvon Martin Had Injuries to His Knuckles [W:1169, 1244]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lets break it down in small bites....

In what way was Zimmerman stalking and why did you omit from wiki

Over a period of time are the key words... Why are you being deceptive?

You can (and probably will) break it down however you want to.

And believe it or not, what happened occurred "over a period of time"
 
You can (and probably will) break it down however you want to.

And believe it or not, what happened occurred "over a period of time"

lol....Do your homework before posting
 
The altercation, according to the prosecutor, was triggered when Zimmerman stalked Martin. Therefore, neither stand your ground nor self defense is an acceptable defense.

Not true, as I will demonstrate later tonight or early tomorrow.
 
I accept your surrender :lol:

Truly sad...

Dude, its series of acts over time...days, weeks, etc

Again, do your homework
 
Now you're jsut dishonestly making stuff up

It says nothing about "days, weeks, etc"

Nope.....

To you wiki is the bible. :roll:

Never depend on just one source

Do your homework
 
Oh, I read it. Other than the obvious gunshot, there were no injuries on his body whatsoever other than wounds on the knuckles.


Zimmerman, on the otherhand had 2 black eyes, a broken nose, and two laceration on the back of his head. This, too, was released from the medical records the day after the shooting from discovery at the trial.

I think the rats need to start looking from some flotsam to latch onto. This suckers' cruise ship is going down.

The core of the case is that GZ created the threat and the circumstances causing the death of Trayvon by failing to do what a reasonable man would do.
 
Following someone is not "starting an altercation".

This has been rehashed so many times here and basically everyone here is in checkmate.

I imagine the jury will be a micro sample of the posters here with perhaps a 50:50 make up of viewing Z as the initiator / M as the initiator.

It will take more evidence to make either side decide to take another stand. With what we have from the media nobody is changing their spot.

So one will have to wait for the jury to learn more unless what I believe will be a plea deal.
 
Truly sad...

Dude, its series of acts over time...days, weeks, etc

Again, do your homework


(b) "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct." Such constitutionally protected activity includes picketing or other organized protests.

(c) "Credible threat" means a threat made with the intent to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety. The threat must be against the life of, or a threat to cause bodily injury to, a person.
 
Oh heavens; follow me like a creep and you'll be starting an altercation - might get tazed or kneed in the nuts if you get too close. I don't care what you think I've done.

If Martin was female would people see it differently? I think they would.
 
Last edited:
Oh heavens; follow me like a creep and you'll be starting an altercation - might get tazed or kneed in the nuts if you get too close. I don't care what you think I've done.

If Martin was female would people see it differently? I think they would.

could this whole affair been aborted if Zimmerman had simply identified himself as part of the Neighborhood Volunteer Watch?
 
"The information could support George Zimmerman's claim that Martin beat him up before Zimmerman shot and killed him."


Hardly shocking to anyone with an IQ over 10 whose bothered to follow fat Al's newest race hustle. I think i hear
tawana brawley being raped. Oh wait, that's Lady Liberty weeping over our new "justice system" , where you are found guilty or innocent by media talking heads instead of juries, and due process makes way for gender and racial identity politics. Let me know when the new york times or washington compost start calling Bill richardson "white"..




Autopsy results show Trayvon Martin had injuries to his knuckles

When you're fighting for your life you may get scraped.

What's the point of this thread? -- To reaffirm the racist minority that a black boy got what he deserved?
 
could this whole affair been aborted if Zimmerman had simply identified himself as part of the Neighborhood Volunteer Watch?

It would have been avoided if he had just stayed the hell in his car and waited for the cops to arrive. Regardless of what people believe about his thoughts or martin's actions. No mater what; it all hinged on the ability for a physical situation to occur.
 
Last edited:
Do you think head-knuckle contact is the only way to injure your hands if you're in a fight or defending yourself?

Why is it so hard to just let it get sorted out at a trial by jury?

When the other person has black eyes, broken nose, busted lips, bruised cheeks, lacerations to the back of head ect and the other person has busted up knuckles is it really unreasonable to believe that the person with the busted up knuckles was assaulting the beaten person?
 
It would have been avoided if he had just stayed the hell in his car and waited for the cops to arrive. Regardless of what people believe about his thoughts or martin's actions. No mater what; it all hinged on the ability for a physical situation to occur.

Getting out of a car does not give someone the right to attempt to beat you to death.
 
Getting out of a car does not give someone the right to attempt to beat you to death.

Getting beaten up after you get out of a car to stick your nose in somebody else's business when you have been warned not to is your own damn fault.
 
The core of the case is that GZ created the threat and the circumstances causing the death of Trayvon by failing to do what a reasonable man would do.

Whether what he did was "reasonable" or not is subjective. Some see it as noble that he takes the time, without being compensated, to inform the police of suspicious activity in his community in order to give himself, his family, his friends and neighbors a safer neighborhood to live in... and in this case, went out his way to be the eyes of the police until they arrived... While others see him as a "busy-body", racial profiling vigilante and wannabee cop out to harass innocent people, who recklessly took the law into his own hands, caused that confrontation and forced Trayvon Martin to beat him senseless... Therefore he should have allowed the beating to go on and not defended himself, because it was exactly what he deserved.

I'm sure glad that people aren't letting their political ideologies cloud their judgement.


<sarcasm off>
 
Getting beaten up after you get out of a car to stick your nose in somebody else's business when you have been warned not to is your own damn fault.

Zimmerman had every right, and good reason to get out of his car. It does not give someone the right to beat him to death. If you believe I am mistaken on this explain it. I'd love to discuss it.
 
Zimmerman had every right, and good reason to get out of his car. It does not give someone the right to beat him to death. If you believe I am mistaken on this explain it. I'd love to discuss it.

If GZ had just listened to the advice he was given we would not be wasting bandwidth on this and a dead kid would be alive today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQMqWAiWPMs

not much changes over time.
 
Getting beaten up after you get out of a car to stick your nose in somebody else's business when you have been warned not to is your own damn fault.

He deserved to get a beating for trying to protect his community and going out of his way to be the eyes of the police untill they arrived. In a "just world", Martin would have had a gun and done away with that evil race-profiling wannabee cop... Ain't that right?
 
Whether what he did was "reasonable" or not is subjective. Some see it as noble that he takes the time, without being compensated, to inform the police of suspicious activity in his community in order to give himself, his family, his friends and neighbors a safer neighborhood to live in... and in this case, went out his way to be the eyes of the police until they arrived...

While others see him as a "busy-body", racial profiling vigilante and wannabee cop out to harass innocent people, who recklessly took the law into his own hands, caused that confrontation and forced Trayvon Martin to beat him senseless... Therefore he should have allowed the beating to go on and not defended himself, because it was exactly what he deserved.

I'm sure glad that people aren't letting their political ideologies cloud their judgement.


<sarcasm off>

Reasonable is the language of the law in this case.

Why do you suppose Trayvon punched GZ?

Think it thru and get back to me.
 
If GZ had just listened to the advice he was given we would not be wasting bandwidth on this and a dead kid would be alive today.

American Skin (41 Shots) - YouTube

not much changes over time.

That doesnt explain why Zimmerman did not have the right to exit his vehicle at all. Are you going to address that or are you ready to concede that he did in fact have the right to exit his vehicle?

If GZ had just listened to the advice he was given

Have you been paying attention to the case? I am curious because this little lie here have been thoroughly discredited. Even if you want to ignore all the evidence in the case, Zimmerman had no obligation at all to do anything here.
 
Reasonable is the language of the law in this case.

If you are talking about the law, then I'm affraid you've got things wrong here. Please point out what law or laws Zimmerman violated?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom