Thread: Do You Think Zimmerman is Guilty?

Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti

Zimmerman exited his car at about 7:12 and the confrontation began at about 7:16, which means Zimmerman was walking around for up to 4 minutes, to find a street sign (according to him) for the street he lived on.

If the account is true as far as the claim about the street sign and about where Z walked to, then there's not even an intersection near where Z was headed. I haven't double checked on Google Earth, but ime, street signs are not common outside of intersections unless the street changes names or something. But afaict, there're three streets and 5 intersections in that neighborhood and the closest intersection would have been back in the direction from where Z had come rather than in the direction in which Z headed or is said to have headed.

idk

Originally Posted by PrometheusBound

Since Trayvon was on other people's property, he had no case about being threatened just because someone there followed him.

I am sure that your thought makes sense. But the words you chose don't seem to do it justice.

Originally Posted by PrometheusBound

Since Trayvon was on other people's property, he had no case about being threatened just because someone there followed him.

Hey genius.. People who live in gated communities are allowed to have friends, family and guests.

But, I will grant you that its a good question to ASK that dimwit GZ..

As in did he KNOW every resident of the Retreat and all their guests and visitors.

Critical thinking is a thing of the past.

Originally Posted by Simon W. Moon

Where did you find this claim from the coroner?
I would like to see it.

I am going to re-submit my request for the autopsy report.

I actually wrongly attributed that to the Coroner when it was actually the mortician. Link HERE
However, it has come out today that the CORONER'S report showed two visible signs of trauma on Martins body. A gunshot wound and abrasions to his knuckles. Link HERE
Many injuries to GZ, none to TM (except the self inflicted knuckles) and the gun shot. That corroborates GZ's version of events.

Originally Posted by Phoenix

I actually wrongly attributed that to the Coroner when it was actually the mortician. Link HERE
However, it has come out today that the CORONER'S report showed two visible signs of trauma on Martins body. A gunshot wound and abrasions to his knuckles. Link HERE
Many injuries to GZ, none to TM (except the self inflicted knuckles) and the gun shot. That corroborates GZ's version of events.

Does the report of M's knuckle injuries corroborate Z's version as much as the report of there being no knuckle injuries on M?

Which one offers greater corroboration?

Originally Posted by CHARMtheMEDIA

No, my babysitter did, who was also my wife's friend. We were over her house having dinner. Girl talk ensued and I decided to go out for my routine nightly jog. I was hit in the face with a brick. The attacker was looking for money. I gave him my wallet and told him to go to town on my credit cards, and I would call the bank in the morning.
He called me an "&$$hole" and threw the wallet back at me.
Guess, you can't buy drugs on credit.
When the police arrived they refused to file a report because I lost nothing (other than a piece of my tooth) and because they felt that the prospect of actually catching the guy was slim.
They left me with one piece of advice.
"dont jog at night anymore"
Nice, right....

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Maybe your attacker thought you were following him. If I saw a picture of him as a smiling ten-year-old, I'd believe that you were the threat. New politically correct rule: joggers are stalkers.

Originally Posted by Simon W. Moon

Does the report of M's knuckle injuries corroborate Z's version as much as the report of there being no knuckle injuries on M?

Which one offers greater corroboration?

One report was provided by a medical doctor.
One report was not.

You tell me which offers greater corrobiration

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by PrometheusBound

Maybe your attacker thought you were following him. If I saw a picture of him as a smiling ten-year-old, I'd believe that you were the threat. New politically correct rule: joggers are stalkers.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by sharon

How?

Did GZ remove his jacket??Did his pants fall off.

If Trayvon has intended to really hurt GZ, he would have hit him in the jaw using the Arizona ice tea in a round house swing.

THAT is what I would have done.

There are a couple of second hand accounts from Z. In the one that comes from some official "familiar with he case", the most recent, iirc, the gun came into view as Z reached for his phone and the physical altercation began then, over the gun.

The "reaching for the phone" bit is in two of three of the accounts I am aware of.

Originally Posted by Simon W. Moon

Does the report of M's knuckle injuries corroborate Z's version as much as the report of there being no knuckle injuries on M?

Which one offers greater corroboration?

I haven't heard that GZ didn't have knuckle injuries. Do you have a link? That is interesting.