


Show me where it gives the watch captain the authority to grant entry. Did the community issue ID cards and guest cards to be carried on their person? Who had legal authority to demand such identification if it existed?
"Already caught one thief before"? Martin wasn't a theif! He was legally in the community as a house guest. Sounds to me as if you too are justifying Zimmerman's actions because Martin was black. Shame on you.
.
.
.
Get Out of Your Own Way

Thats not necessarily true we have gated communites for Condos that even have a Shack for some sort of a community secuirty guard. Yet most of them don't have anyone working in the shack. Some they just leave the light on in the shack. They even have these communities around Golf Courses. Only cops around to patrol out in those areas are County Sherriffs and State Police. So it's not like they would be able to show up lickety split if anything is happening.
Moreover people in a community are apt to notice someone who is not from their community if it is a small community. Still what profiling is there other than Zimmerman saying something about punks that had been in the neighborhood?
" I have Learned.....That to be with those I like, is Enough!" ~ Walt Whitman

No see thats where you are confused. I am not applying any race. If you read the report none of the other Association members wanted to do it, go out and patrol. According to the Woman in the Association they went over the guidlines. Especially about acting like a vigilante. To call the police and another member. Yet they knew for months Zimmermann had been patrolling and had caught a thief before. Plus had made like 42 calls to the cops over incidents in the community. So again he said punks not applying it to any race.
" I have Learned.....That to be with those I like, is Enough!" ~ Walt Whitman



I was unaware that Zimmerman's community had a manned gate. So the person at the gate granted Martin entry. And then Zimmerman shot Martin because he thought he was a theif. What the hell was Zimmerman doing challenging Martin if the gate guard had already cleared Martin's entry?
.
.
.
Get Out of Your Own Way

There is a timelog they have. So they know Zimmermann called the cops first. the dispatcher told him not to follow. So we know he was awaiting for the cops to get there and then followed the Martin Kid.
As ABC TV asked what evidence is there that has changed from 3 weeks ago, that would warrant a second degree murder charge? Even tho this Special Prosecutor is saying profiling.
" I have Learned.....That to be with those I like, is Enough!" ~ Walt Whitman

No, we do. Z said he was on his way to Target, [well Z's dad said he said], not doing a neighborhood patrol though. So the NWH gun thing isn't relevant at all afaict.
He covered the distance that he covered in something like 15 seconds. He then has 1:35, iirc, while on the phone to make it back to his truck covering the same distance he just covered in 15 seconds. Then after that, there is another 2 -4 minutes, (i forget) before he runs into Martin.
So, it doesn't seem that he returned straight away after being advised his actions were redundant, nor that he returned to his truck as the call ended.
That's probably ten to twelve times the amount of time it took him to cover the distance that he went from his vehicle to get back to his vehicle.
Idk what he did, or why, but it doesn't seem that he went directly back to his vehicle "at the end of the call."
I may be wrong.


Apparently it is you who doesn't care about the actual evidence and would unwisely prefer to rely on irrelevant info like this supposed analysis, to support your position.
Analysis' that doesn't even hold to the standards that the examiner himself says they need to.
Analysis' that have already been discredited because they don't. lol
An analysis contracted by and for the media, with 2nd or 3rd generation copies of the 911 audio.
It wasn't an official analysis, contacted by the prosecution or the defense.
It is third party generated and therefore meaningless.
But we do have two eye-witness, who you want to ignore in favor of a meaningless analysis.
But since you would rather engage in speculation, and use meaningless analysis, lets engage in some logical speculation.
The mother say's it was Trayvon.
To counter, the defense will then contract an analysis of their own.
Do you want to place a bet that they will provide actual copies of Zimmerman screaming for a more accurate analysis?
If the evidence that we know of is accurate, then of course the defense is going to contract such an analysis.
But, until an actual official analysis is done, any discussion about who is screaming goes to the eye-witnesses.
Not distressed parents.
Really?
The way I portrayed?
Which way was that?
Check yourself bro.
Then check out the information below that has been reported as being released by the police.
If you don't like the way it is portrayed, then talk to the police.
Maybe they will spin it the way you want them to.
Code:Police: Zimmerman says Trayvon decked him with one blow then began hammering his headWith a single punch, Trayvon Martin decked the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who eventually shot and killed the unarmed 17-year-old, then Trayvon climbed on top of George Zimmerman and slammed his head into the sidewalk, leaving him bloody and battered, law-enforcement authorities told the Orlando Sentinel. That is the account Zimmerman gave police, and much of it has been corroborated by witnesses, authorities say. There have been no reports that a witness saw the initial punch Zimmerman told police about. In his version of events, Zimmerman had turned around and was walking back to his SUV when Trayvon approached him from behind, the two exchanged words and then Trayvon punched him in the nose, sending him to the ground, and began beating him. ... He said he was on his way to the grocery store when he spotted Trayvon walking through his gated community. ... Zimmerman told them he lost sight of Trayvon and was walking back to his SUV when Trayvon approached him from the left rear, and they exchanged words. Trayvon asked Zimmerman if he had a problem. Zimmerman said no and reached for his cell phone, he told police. Trayvon then said, "Well, you do now" or something similar and punched Zimmerman in the nose, according to the account he gave police. Zimmerman fell to the ground and Trayvon got on top of him and began slamming his head into the sidewalk, he told police. Zimmerman began yelling for help. Several witnesses heard those cries, and there has been a dispute about whether they came from Zimmerman or Trayvon. Lawyers for Trayvon's family say it was Trayvon, but police say their evidence indicates it was Zimmerman. One witness, who has since talked to local television news reporters, told police he saw Zimmerman on the ground with Trayvon on top, pounding him — and was unequivocal that it was Zimmerman who was crying for help. Zimmerman then shot Trayvon once in the chest at very close range, according to authorities.Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman's account to police of the Trayvon Martin shooting. - Orlando Sentinel
Talk about doing more supposin'!
Speaking? lol There is raised tensions here, and you have them speaking, instead of engaged in a confrontational exchange of words.
How convenient.
Considering your rant further down the page, are you asserting that the girlfriend lied when she said Trayvon relayed to her that he had lost him?
Really? You are going to cry or complain because I provide evidence.
And you are going to cry or complain because it exposes the false information.
Really?
Not.
Let me address what you so condescendingly froth.
Hyperbolic fantasy. Especially since it is the information I provide, as reported in the media.
Most people would be happy to receive valid information.
The only reason I can figure you are upset, would be because the information provided doesn't agree with a preconceived biased opinion that you hold.
lol
It isn't a matter of "agreement", but is a matter of relevance, or accuracy of the information.
Sorry you don't like that.
I never said it was irrelevant. Two things I have said about her statement, are the following.
One. It is consistent with Zimmerman's account.
Two. I think her account is suspect because of her non-cooperation with authorities.
What is your problem with this?
Are you speaking about the eye-witness vs. ear-witness? I hope not, because if you are - OMG!
That should be an easy one for anyone to understand, for anyone except grieving family, and those with a preconceived biased opinion.
Which category are you in?
I never said that.
I said it is evidence.
Again, something I never said.
I am starting to think you have me confused with someone else.
Afik, this is sad hyperbolic crying. Please stop, you are embarrassing yourself.