Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Political forums > Warfare > War on Terror



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-09, 01:06 PM   #1
GOVT MULE
 
kansaswhig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Last Seen: Today 04:55 PM
Location: KS
Posts: 1,075
Thanks: 242
Thanked 457 Times in 267 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

US Army:  11 years service; 2 tours w/101st Airborne in Iraq (03-04, 05-06) 
Total Awards: 1

The Next Osama?

Great article at FP:

Quote:
Eight years after the September 11 attacks -- years that have seen many precious lives lost and an overwhelming expenditure of effort and money -- the battle against al Qaeda still continues, and it is still not clear whether America is winning or not. As I give talks on this topic to everyone from undergraduate students to counterterrorism practitioners to community groups, I am invariably asked whether there is a winner in the war on terrorism. Questioners are almost always dissatisfied with my answer: "It depends."

But this is the only answer I can give, because the terms of the question are out of date. If you're asking whether the United States has defeated al Qaeda, you also have to ask: Which al Qaeda are we talking about? The senior leaders operating somewhere in the tribal areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan? The al Qaeda franchises around the world, most notably in Iraq, Algeria, and Yemen? Or the global ideological following, sparked by al Qaeda, calling itself al Qaeda, but not technically affiliated with al Qaeda? If you ask about winning, you have to also ask whether winning means killing the organization or just handicapping it. Does it refer to destroying al Qaeda's military capabilities, or to mitigating al Qaeda's ability to win hearts and minds around the world?

As these questions suggest, over the last eight years al Qaeda has undergone a metamorphosis. It has transformed from a global terrorist group into a global terrorist movement, one with its own founding fathers, well-codified doctrine, substantial and accessible corpus of literature, and deep bench of young, bright, and ambitious commanders. Attacks still matter to them, but in an era of increased counterterrorism pressure, al Qaeda is beginning to realize that it is a lot more effective at being a movement, an ideology, even a worldview. It is starting to see that terrorism is only one of many tools in its arsenal and that changing minds matters more than changing policies.

In other words, the al Qaeda that we are fighting in 2009 is not the same al Qaeda that we went to war with in 2001. Unfortunately, however, our own mindset has remained mostly unchanged.

Much of al Qaeda's evolution over the last eight years is embodied in one man, Sheikh Abu Yahya al-Libi, director of al Qaeda's jurisprudence committee and a likely successor to Osama bin Laden. Young, media-savvy, ideologically extreme, and masterful at justifying savage acts of terrorism with esoteric religious arguments, Abu Yahya offers the global al Qaeda movement everything that its old guard cannot.
Full Article
__________________
Modern Whig Party
A Party for the rest of us.
kansaswhig is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kansaswhig For This Useful Post:
Old 09-12-09, 01:46 PM   #2
Left/Right of Center

 
Arcana XV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Today 10:21 PM
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 1,096
Thanked 1,235 Times in 685 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Female
Re: The Next Osama?

Very good article. Looks like AlQaeda is following in the footsteps of other terrorist organisations in the past that also realized that violence alone will not get them what they want. Eventually, they all reduce the violence and increase the ideology speeches that do win more minds, especially the young and highly educated, around to the cause.
__________________
"Yes, but are you a Protestant atheist or a Catholic atheist?".- Northern Irish joke
Arcana XV is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-09, 01:58 PM   #3
GOVT MULE
 
kansaswhig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Last Seen: Today 04:55 PM
Location: KS
Posts: 1,075
Thanks: 242
Thanked 457 Times in 267 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

US Army:  11 years service; 2 tours w/101st Airborne in Iraq (03-04, 05-06) 
Total Awards: 1

Re: The Next Osama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcana XV View Post
Eventually, they all reduce the violence and increase the ideology speeches that do win more minds, especially the young and highly educated, around to the cause.
The Wahhabism movement is alive and well. The Maddrassas have been built; probably more to follow. More importantly, they target audience is breeding at an astounding rate all over the world...especially Europe.
__________________
Modern Whig Party
A Party for the rest of us.
kansaswhig is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-09, 07:30 PM   #4
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Today 09:19 PM
Posts: 10,417
Thanks: 3,664
Thanked 1,640 Times in 1,090 Posts

US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 
Total Awards: 1

Re: The Next Osama?

Thread bump.
__________________

OBL 11/24/02
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-09, 08:05 PM   #5
Educator
 
other's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Last Seen: 02-21-10 02:54 PM
Location: VA
Posts: 615
Thanks: 197
Thanked 212 Times in 143 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

US Marines:  Served in US Marine Corps Infantry: 2003-2007.  Thanks for your service! 
Total Awards: 1

Re: The Next Osama?

And what happens when there's a fanatical ideology at war with you, and you are unable or unwilling to acknowledge it?

There is real danger because of the dispersion of wahhabism, linked through western communication networks to what is essentially a central group of propagandists. Internal law enforcement agencies need to be on the alert, and we need to remain on the offensive. This is a war, unfortunately, where it is difficult to pin down what constitutes a success or a defeat. These extremists' sole purpose is the propagation of violence as a means to an end--neither peace nor compromise is not an option for them.

<thanks for posting the article>
other is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-09, 08:38 AM   #6
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: 10-12-09 08:38 AM
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The Next Osama?

Norman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts