Chomsky- The US is a Terrorist State - Page 3

Iriemon · 08-06-07, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gardener

I said buffoon,not idiot. I also said that the original poster was perusing hate sites, which is true,since informationclearinghouse is just that.

Just because you gobble up the incredibly hackneyed, dogmatic cr@p Chomsky dispenses, that doesn't mean everybody does.

Your post as well as your dogmatism,are both useless.

Well, this is a new slur for you, "dogmatic".

You are more dynamic in your insulting and flaming than I had thought.

Voidwar · 08-06-07, 02:12 PM

Take it to Lover's Quarrel Iriemom.

Your ad homs on Gardener are not on topic.

niftydrifty · 08-06-07, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

Take it to Lover's Quarrel Iriemom.

Your ad homs on Gardener are not on topic.

LOL, Iriemon was merely pointing out the off-topic labelling being done by Gardener.

meanwhile there is no refutation of anything said by Chomsky.

Voidwar · 08-06-07, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by niftydrifty

meanwhile there is no refutation of anything said by Chomsky.

I refuted the thread title, or was that a misquote ???

Or are you just having literacy troubles ?

VTA · 08-06-07, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by niftydrifty

LOL, Iriemon was merely pointing out the off-topic labelling being done by Gardener.

meanwhile there is no refutation of anything said by Chomsky.

You seem to want to put an onus on people to prove him wrong, but to be fair, lets remember that Chomsky isn't omniscient. He is very interesting and worth listening to, but to place him in the category of ultimate correction is pretty extreme. Where is his proof? Where is his Eisenhower quote proof? That to me is an interesting point.

niftydrifty · 08-06-07, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VTA

You seem to want to put an onus on people to prove him wrong, but to be fair, lets remember that Chomsky isn't omniscient. He is very interesting and worth listening to, but to place him in the category of ultimate correction is pretty extreme. Where is his proof? Where is his Eisenhower quote proof? That to me is an interesting point.

now we're getting somewhere. thanks for engaging. I didn't ask anyone to prove him wrong, I have just been asking for anyone, anyone at all, to submit any kind of a critique so that we could have a debate. is it too much to ask? good gawd!

what did Chomsky say that Eisenhower said? is it elsewhere and not at the link?

niftydrifty · 08-06-07, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

I refuted the thread title, or was that a misquote ???

Or are you just having literacy troubles ?

I understood you quite well when you said, "Iran is a terrorist rogue nation." - Voidwar, 4/16/2007

how is Iran different than the US, except for the specific terrorists that they sponsor and arm?

Voidwar · 08-06-07, 03:18 PM

Iran provides weapons to Hezbollah who fire on civilians while hiding behind civilians.

The guys firing these missiles are not in Iranian Uniforms, and deliberately so.

It is the dishonesty of "plausible deniability". But I'm not fooled.

On the Other Hand, the IDF and the USAF and the US Navy Pilots all wear there uniforms and country flags while they do their work, so if you don't like what they are doing, then you know who to declare war on then, DON'TCHA ?

Broad Daylight WAR. Declare it, and win or lose.

niftydrifty · 08-06-07, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

Iran provides weapons to Hezbollah who fire on civilians while hiding behind civilians.

The guys firing these missiles are not in Iranian Uniforms, and deliberately so.

It is the dishonesty of "plausible deniability". But I'm not fooled.

On the Other Hand, the IDF and the USAF and the US Navy Pilots all wear there uniforms and country flags while they do their work, so if you don't like what they are doing, then you know who to declare war on then, DON'TCHA ?

Broad Daylight WAR. Declare it, and win or lose.

exactly.

Voidwar · 08-06-07, 03:30 PM

whatever thats supposed to mean.

Chumpsky is refuted, and you are admittedly vague.