Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives Truth Behind Iraq WMD and Terror Associations; I’ve been doing my homework concerning the precursors that led the U.S. to war with Iraq, and the ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-08, 05:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Last Online: 11-26-08 03:02 PM
Posts: 168
Thanks: 19
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Truth Behind Iraq WMD and Terror Associations

I’ve been doing my homework concerning the precursors that led the U.S. to war with Iraq, and the more I delve into it the more it becomes obvious that the American people were severely mislead into believing the Iraq had a significant Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) stockpile or that their WMD manufacturing capabilities were increasing. Of equal concern in comparison to Iraq’s perceived WMD stockpile was the potential threat of Al-Qaida terrorists linked to the Iraqi government. What follows is a chronolog of events with supporting documentation from credible media outlets and our own U.S. government that will prove that WMD did not exist in Iraq prior to the U.S. declaration of war. Moreover, the “truth” as to what really happened to the WMD reportly found in Iraq will shock you!

To understand how the U.S. went to war with Iraq you must start from the beginning, United Nations Security Counsel 1441. This resolution basically addressed the difficulties U.N. weapons inspectors had in attempting to inspect specific facilities thought to be producing or stockpiling WMD in Iraq. While it remains unclear whether or not the Iraqi government actually used deceptive practices to “hide” their WMD stockpiles and/or manufacturing capabilities prior to the Iraq war including possibly transporting weapons stockpiles to neighboring counties, namely Syria, Lebonon and Iran, in the weeks before Operation Iraqi Freedom began, began, one thing became clear after the U.S. led invasion into Iraq was well underway: Saddam Hussein was telling the truth! No production of WMDs was taking place in Iraq, and no WMD stockpiles existed prior to the U.S. declaration of war on Iraq. This assertion was substantiated when in 2006 the National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC), a US Department of Defense entity, released a report detailing that the weapons of mass destruction that had been found in Iraq, including pre-1991 sarin gas and mustard agent, were, in fact, destroyed by the Iraqi government as had been previously reported prior to the war. Moreover, in 2002 the Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country, the administration’s own inspectors reported [link to final report]:
“While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered.”
The review was conducted by Charles Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group. In October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis [ Washington Post article where quote derives]:
"The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there." (Also see this follow-up article from January, 2005)
Let’s back-track for a moment…

UNSC resolution 1441 was portrayed by many Americans (and the world-at-large) to be the American government’s justification to go to war with Iraq. However, while some politicians have argued that the resolution could authorize war under certain circumstances, the representatives present during the November 8, 2002 U.N. counsel meeting that voted on the U.N. resolution were clear that this was not the case. The ambassador for the United States, John Negroponte, said:
“[T]his resolution contains no 'hidden triggers' and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by UNMOVIC, the IAEA or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12."
The wording of the resolution never indicated that military action would be authorized against Iraq should U.N. weapons inspectors not find WMD or if it was believed that they continued to meet “resistance” in locating WMD by the Iraqi government. The legal debate continues on this front. Nonetheless, it became clear that the call for war which originated with UNSC 1441 and “trumped up” on February 3, 2003 by former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation to the U.N. Security Council on the U.S. case against Iraq was, in fact, the wrong call!

Let’s go forward to the War in Iraq…

The search for WMD was daunting! U.S. led coalition forces searched high and low in every nook and cranny for WMD. At last they found them…or did they? Remember those mobile chemical labs from the presentation Secretary Powell gave to the U.N.? Turns out they were actually used for the production of hydrogen to fill artillery balloons, as the Iraqis have continued to insist. This linked FoxNews report (June 2006) declares that 500 WMD were found in Iraq since 2003 in the early stages of the war. However, upon careful analysis, Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, along with Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee that the munitions found were “badly corroded” and that they could not currently be used as originally intended. So much for Iraq’s WMD capability being such an looming threat to U.S. national security. Nonetheless, in October of 2004 the New York Times reported that a large quantity of the munitions that were discovered in Iraq suddenly came up missing without a trace. More surprising is the fact that despite their discovery, the American officials have never publicly announced their disappearance. You’d think the U.S. would be concerned that such a large weapons stockpile would suddenly go missing. The obvious questions are why wasn’t this reported at least with a stronger sense of urgency and how could such weapons simply vanish without a trace? The Answer: they were American made weapons sold to the Iraqi government during the Reagan-Bush administration during the Iran-Contra affair. Seems as though the Iranian militia weren’t the only benefactors of U.S. arms during the Iran-Iraq war.

It should be noted that although the threat to America from Iraq’s WMD capabilities has been proven to be of far less consequence since the War in Iraq began, many top level U.S. official – both in government and in the military - still believe that Iraq was and remains a viable threat to our national security. Moreover, they believe there are still WMD stockpiles that remain undiscovered. But even if this is so, what troubles me is that certain things have not been reported and/or there doesn't seem to be any follow-up on reported 'substaintiated' claims that Iraqi WMD exists elsewhere whether in a remote bunker or in other countries. There's obviously more than meets the eye taking shape with the War on Iraq. And it's very doubtful that any amount of investigation - whether public or private - well ever get to the whole truth.

(Sidenote: The question of Al-Qiada terror training camps was also in question during Secretary Powell's presentation to the U.N. While it is true that some terror training camps were discovered and subsequently destroyed by U.S./coalition forces during the early stages of the War, most of these camps didn't come into being until after the war had began.)

Be mindful of what you hear and read in the mainstream media. I urge you to do your homework and research the accounts of what's being reported including the information contained herein. It's up to all of us to seak out the truth. Based on the information I've discovered coupled with what our government is not telling us, I remain convinced that the War in Iraq remains an unjust cause. This doesn't mean, however, that I do not believe that something didn't need to be done to put the Iraqi regime in check. It simply means I totally disagree with the merit for going to war with Iraq. Nonetheless, as a prior service veteran, I will continue to support our troops until they are all brought back home.
Objective Voice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 06-05-08, 06:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Last Online: 11-26-08 03:02 PM
Posts: 168
Thanks: 19
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Thread Starter Re: Truth Behind Iraq WMD and Terror Associations

Hate to say, "I told you so," but this latest article from CNN.com supports what I posted above - that the intel was wrong and certain aspects of it were manipulated.

I like how the Republicans try to shift blame on the Democrates and even refuse to take responsibility for their deceptive misinformation tactics.

From the article...

Quote:
The top Republican on the committee dismissed its findings as "partisan gamesmanship."

"It is ironic that the Democrats would knowingly distort and misrepresent the committee's findings and the intelligence in an effort to prove that the administration distorted and mischaracterized the intelligence," said Sen. Christopher Bond of Missouri.

The White House also rejected the report as old news.

"I know this is another report, and I'm sure that they put a lot of considerable thought into it, but this is a subject that has been gone over many many, many times, and I don't know of anything that's particularly new in it," said spokeswoman Dana Perino, who said she had not yet read it.
I want to say since Ms. Perino hasn't read the report she really can't comment on it, but since I haven't read it either...

But I have read this one...

Senate Select Committee on Intellegence report: " Postwar Finding About Iraq's WMD Programs & Links to Terrorist & How The Compare with Prewar Assessments," dated September 8, 2006

Which basically brought the same truthes to light. Of course, most Americans brushed off the first report the same as they brushed off John McClellan's book. Why then would they pay any attention to this latest report?
Objective Voice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 06-15-08, 05:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Last Online: 11-24-08 12:41 PM
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

Current Mood:
Cheerful
Re: Truth Behind Iraq WMD and Terror Associations

the non thinking americans CHOSE to be misled by bush. They never questioned his lies from the beginning. They never demanded PROOF , and simply took his words on "faith" and face value. They bought into them as if they were gospel ....... and we know how important "gospel" is , in the US.


The americans continue to cherry pick what they believe and don't. As long as it fits their preconcieved ideas........ they "believe" it. They are not the smartest group on the planet .
Sage077 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 06-15-08, 05:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Last Online: 11-24-08 12:41 PM
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

Current Mood:
Cheerful
Re: Truth Behind Iraq WMD and Terror Associations

Quote:
Which basically brought the same truthes to light. Of course, most Americans brushed off the first report the same as they brushed off John McClellan's book. Why then would they pay any attention to this latest report?

why indeed!! For one thing, they can't be bothered. For another, if it does not fit their preconcieved ideation, they dismiss it .
Sage077 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
1009 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO