Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives Lancet study validity in doubt; Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und You tried oh so hard, and you failed miserably. The Kane study from Oxford. http://www....

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-08, 09:43 AM   #231 (permalink)
Litre of the Banned


 
Billo_Really's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 08-17-08 02:16 PM
Location: HBCA
Posts: 17,980
Thanks: 352
Thanked 753 Times in 547 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal
Gender: Male

Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
You tried oh so hard, and you failed miserably.


The Kane study from Oxford.
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/users/On..._versus_L2.pdf


You lose. again. as usual.
I'm sorry, I reject Oxford too.

Get another source.

You reject Columbia University, I reject Oxford.

Do you see how stupid this "source game" gets after awhile?
__________________

"Political correctness is tyranny with manners"
- Charlton Heston
Billo_Really is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 02-22-08, 12:52 PM   #232 (permalink)
The Marine
Mod Team Member

 
GySgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 06:12 PM
Location: 29 Palms, CA
Posts: 12,701
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1,259 Times in 786 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! US Marines:  Gunny is an active duty marine who continues to serve his country with honor and distinction. 

Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
Show me one post of mine where I have dismissed other reports.
It's your attitude. Hence your continual blessing of the report despite the common sense that contradicts it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
My position has been that they are the experts in this field, I trust their judgement.
Yet the other overwhelming experts of the field who contradict this report are not to be trusted? The truth is that you choose to trust those that validate your grievances and protests rather than their expert offering.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
If you want to crucify me for this you can....
You crucify yourself.
__________________

GySgt
Semper Fidelis
USMC
GySgt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-22-08, 01:40 PM   #233 (permalink)
Litre of the Banned


 
Billo_Really's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 08-17-08 02:16 PM
Location: HBCA
Posts: 17,980
Thanks: 352
Thanked 753 Times in 547 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal
Gender: Male

Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by GySgt View Post
It's your attitude. Hence your continual blessing of the report despite the common sense that contradicts it.



Yet the other overwhelming experts of the field who contradict this report are not to be trusted? The truth is that you choose to trust those that validate your grievances and protests rather than their expert offering.



You crucify yourself.
So now you've become a Spin Doctor!

You see, you can't show any posts of mine to back up what you say.

The only thing you can do, is lie!
Billo_Really is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-23-08, 03:18 AM   #234 (permalink)
◊-Dıąmọŋđ™
Mod team member



 
Tashah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Last Online: Today 04:28 PM
Location: ישראל
Posts: 8,212
Thanks: 930
Thanked 1,646 Times in 978 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Female

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! Israel Defense Forces:  Thank you for service to your country to make the world a safer place. 

Current Mood:
Amused
Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
So now you've become a Spin Doctor!

You see, you can't show any posts of mine to back up what you say.

The only thing you can do, is lie!
Many posters here have offered rebuttal materials and logic. You choose to ignore/dismiss these items and exclusively promote the Lancet. That's your choice, but the undeniable fact remains that the Lancet Report has been contested on many different levels.
__________________

•··· Always dance as if no one is watching ···•

Tashah is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-23-08, 09:41 AM   #235 (permalink)
Sage


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 08:11 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 10,391
Thanks: 821
Thanked 1,336 Times in 978 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Inspired
Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
I'm sorry, I reject Oxford too.

Get another source.

You reject Columbia University, I reject Oxford.

Do you see how stupid this "source game" gets after awhile?


I most assuredly see something indeed that can be deemed "stupid".



You are cutting and running with your fingers in your ears once again.
__________________
كافر
Never forget those who died.
Never forget those who killed them.

Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-23-08, 11:02 AM   #236 (permalink)
Litre of the Banned


 
Billo_Really's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 08-17-08 02:16 PM
Location: HBCA
Posts: 17,980
Thanks: 352
Thanked 753 Times in 547 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal
Gender: Male

Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
I most assuredly see something indeed that can be deemed "stupid".

You are cutting and running with your fingers in your ears once again.
You're the one who can't deal with this issue.

Why?
Billo_Really is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-23-08, 11:04 AM   #237 (permalink)
Litre of the Banned


 
Billo_Really's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 08-17-08 02:16 PM
Location: HBCA
Posts: 17,980
Thanks: 352
Thanked 753 Times in 547 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal
Gender: Male

Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tashah View Post
Many posters here have offered rebuttal materials and logic. You choose to ignore/dismiss these items and exclusively promote the Lancet. That's your choice, but the undeniable fact remains that the Lancet Report has been contested on many different levels.
How many times do I have to say "I've not dismissed any report" before you drop this point from your agenda?
Billo_Really is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-24-08, 09:25 AM   #238 (permalink)
Sage


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 08:11 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 10,391
Thanks: 821
Thanked 1,336 Times in 978 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Inspired
Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
How many times do I have to say "I've not dismissed any report" before you drop this point from your agenda?



You dismissed the kane study because it was beyond your comprehension according to your own words.


Just saying now "I've not dismissed any report" does not make it true.
Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-24-08, 11:49 AM   #239 (permalink)
Litre of the Banned


 
Billo_Really's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 08-17-08 02:16 PM
Location: HBCA
Posts: 17,980
Thanks: 352
Thanked 753 Times in 547 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal
Gender: Male

Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
You dismissed the kane study because it was beyond your comprehension according to your own words.


Just saying now "I've not dismissed any report" does not make it true.
I said I "...couldn't understand it".

There's a big difference.
Billo_Really is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 02-24-08, 01:13 PM   #240 (permalink)
Sage


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 08:11 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 10,391
Thanks: 821
Thanked 1,336 Times in 978 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Inspired
Re: Lancet study validity in doubt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
I said I "...couldn't understand it".

There's a big difference.



Well tell me then about the raw data in the lancet report and how you feel its methodology make it accurate or even relevant.
Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Diogenes
· · ·
Member Galleries
991 photos
196 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO