I don't agree with his views,, but this is an unwarranted banning, IMO.
In my opinion, with the information I have, I have to agree. Don’t know all the other particulars though about alternate identities. I didn’t see what Jenin did either the other day either, except propaganda, as Jenin seemed very polite to me. I do know that it appears too sensitive of an environment for debate by rude, crude, and socially unattractive people like me, especially if a moderator is involved in the debate (G>B excluded, he took it all like a real man); I might have to call a police officer “incompetent” when he points his gun at innocent people for a split second of advantage to HIS safety, as in protect and serve yourself, as if the innocent under threat from Barney Fife have no right to protect themselves, and we can’t debate it if the incompetent policeman is a Moderator.
“So you ‘don't troll,’ yet you persisted to ramble on about the CIA in South America, Nixon, ‘Americans are stupid,’ insultive behavior, and mindless bashing for bashings sake.”
Mr_Dbater said: “Oh and the other day you mentioned about how unedumecated Muslims are. Take a look at these throwbacks Americans are stupid - BREAK.com”
“Americans are stupid” is the title of the video (from another source), so the context here of the so-called “insultive behavior” is to point out that Americans are as “undeumecated” [sic] as Muslims. Claiming that Americans are as stupid as Muslims is a valid argument to be made on a message board entitled “debate politics.” Politics involves insults, as we can see in cartoons daily, so insults have to be dealt with and not swept under the rug. I have no defense for the “Americans are stupid” video, it accurately portrays the ignorance we see around us every day. Since Mr_Dbater is smarter than the Americans in that “Americans are stupid” video, and he is so European, I would like to ask Mr_Dbater who the magical “they” are that Saddam said, “should, rather, be reassured and helped to save themselves, and their surroundings:”
“On the basis of what we said about Iraq while confronting aggressions, the world now needs to abort the US aggressive schemes, including its aggression on the Afghan people, which must stop.
Again we say that when someone feels that he is unjustly treated, and no one is repulsing or stopping the injustice inflicted on him, he personally seeks ways and means for lifting that justice. Of course, not everyone is capable of finding the best way for lifting the injustice inflicted on him. People resort to what they think is the best way according to their own ideas, and they are not all capable of reaching out for what is beyond what is available to arrive to the best idea or means.
To find the best way, after having found their way to God and His rights, those who are inflicted by injustice need not to be isolated from their natural milieu, or be ignored deliberately, or as a result of mis-appreciation, by the officials in this milieu. They should, rather, be reassured and helped to save themselves, and their surroundings.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
I think I have already asked you Iriemon about the magical “they,” and I don’t remember getting an answer, so I will keep asking: I don’t want to remain “undeumecated.”
*****
Mr_Dbater said: “The USA should have kept their noses out of other people's business.”
Since we have no business stopping tyranny, therefore Mr_Dbater must shut up and be banned from speaking his mind. I agree that we never should have participated in the United Nations (of tyrants too) war in Iraq, especially when the inevitable goal was a United Nations (of tyrants too) cease-fire to preserve the tyranny that started under the Carter administration (in the same year that Afghanistan was invaded by the Soviet Union), that consequently caused the recruiting poster
One Iraq, Two Iraq, Three Iraq! for 911 in reaction to the lukewarm “liberal“ arts of war of continuing “protracted blockade” and containment of Wesley Clark‘s “Cork” in the Iranian bottle (created by the French):
“H
32. Requires Iraq to inform the Security Council that it will not commit or support any act of international terrorism or allow any organization directed towards commission of such acts to operate within its territory and to condemn unequivocally and renounce all acts, methods and practices of terrorism;
I
33. Declares that, upon official notification by Iraq to the Secretary-General and to the Security Council of its acceptance of the provisions above, a formal cease-fire is effective between Iraq and Kuwait and the Member States cooperating with Kuwait in accordance with resolution 678 (1990);”
RESOLUTION 687 (1991) Adopted by the Security Council at its 2981st meeting, on 3 April 1991
Air France is so nice.
So far, you can prove Jack shiite. But we already knew that.
Anytime you are ready to end the war just say the word, and remember to give us the coordinates of your Al Quacka buddies.
Good bye, troll. Or should I say, Robin?
