• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

S

sincereadvice

New member
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...

You don't appear to be acquainted with either reason or logic, so I find it rather amusing that you'd attempt to reference them.
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...
You mentioned STEM fields allowing people to shape the entire world and directly followed it by saying this world is based on physicality? That was a quick contradiction.
 
sincereadvice said:
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?
Click to expand...

It is the only logical and rational choice since they need to have something to do while we men are all running around and powerlifting things just because we can.
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...

There is more to leadership than physical stamina and strength. As long as a woman is well through menopause, I'm a possible supporter for POTUS. It occurs to me that we live in a violent world run by men. Perhaps it's PAST time to try something else.
 
"You mentioned STEM fields allowing people to shape the entire world and directly followed it by saying this world is based on physicality? That was a quick contradiction. "

how is that a contradiction?
Stem fields are the specialized areas of study through which people learn the rules that the physical world is governed by...and by studying them and learning them can use that knowledge to create change in the physical world
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...
Physical strength is necessarily a hallmark of intelligence.

Research studies suggest that men get most of their intelligence from their mother.


Heredity Theory Says in Males, Intelligence Comes From Mom - WSJ
 
Is there a contest to see who can make the most sexist question of the year that I don't know about?
 
New poster making a trolling post.

Boy, that's something we never see around here....:roll:
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...

There is more to leadership than physical strength, my friend. Intelligence is a huge factor when it comes to being a good leader.
 
MaggieD said:
There is more to leadership than physical stamina and strength. As long as a woman is well through menopause, I'm a possible supporter for POTUS. It occurs to me that we live in a violent world run by men. Perhaps it's PAST time to try something else.
Click to expand...

Head back to the kitchen lil' lady and leave this discussion to the men folk.

;)
 
TheGoverness said:
Well then, maybe next year The Rock will get his shot at the presidency.
Click to expand...

Nope. Not good enough. To be a satisfying candidate for me, the entirety of your central nervous system has to be replaced with muscle fiber - that's a literal muscle head in my book.

Also, Google Images was not as entertaining as I anticipated when I googled "literal muscle head." Bummer.
 
Jesse Booth said:
Nope. Not good enough. To be a satisfying candidate for me, the entirety of your central nervous system has to be replaced with muscle fiber - that's a literal muscle head in my book.

Also, Google Images was not as entertaining as I anticipated when I googled "literal muscle head." Bummer.
Click to expand...

So, something like this?

3AQi4.jpg
 
Married women control 50% of the money, and 100% of the vagina.

I consider that an unfair advantage.

But I'm gonna shut up now.
The wife (and her vagina) are right over there.

Crap.
She's coming over here, I gotta go.
:(:doh:shock::drink
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...

TLDR

Stupid post is stupid.
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...

And here's this gem. Welcome to the weekend everybody! :2wave:
 
sincereadvice said:
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?

similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?

Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==

According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==

This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?

this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.

‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown

constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated! :D
Click to expand...

Gender has nothing to do with whether a person is better at a leadership position any more than the color of their eyes.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
You don't appear to be acquainted with either reason or logic, so I find it rather amusing that you'd attempt to reference them.
Click to expand...

GRAMMAR & SPELLING is not their strong point either.

Shouldn't the title say, " Why would a person choose a WOMAN to be their leader "?

ESL?

Sounds like a sex ad on Craig's List....written by a group of guys in Ghana copying text on the wall.

" I love to talk long waaks witt you on the beach in Grand Island, Nebraska."

be still my beating heart!
 
Last edited:
If you watch FOX NEWS, then you already know that there's a plethora of highly intelligent women in the political field.
I personally would jump at the chance to put a women in office, but I am gender-blind just as much as I am colorblind.
As for the likes of Hillary Clinton (an asexual candidate), I might vote for her if a gun were pointed at my temple (or maybe not).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom