| Archives McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill; Originally Posted by Chanda
Then it can prioritize.
You want to take money away from serving soldier to give it ... |
04-19-08, 02:45 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007 Last Online: 11-13-08 07:43 PM
Posts: 1,785
Thanks: 115
Thanked 317 Times in 236 Posts
Awards: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda Then it can prioritize. | You want to take money away from serving soldier to give it to veterans? Does that really make sense? Quote: |
Holding him accountable is beating up on him? I never thought of it that way.
| How are you holding him accountable? Who can we hold accountable for the increase in the deficit? You? Quote: |
We can cut spending by bringing the troops home.
| That train left the station when the troops went into Iraq. Too bad Bush wasn't wiser at the time but the Congress approved of his plans and voted for it. Now we are all sorry but it seems, no wiser. The troops will be in Iraq for many years if not decades to come. Think of the future not the past.
Back to the matter at hand - Instead of coming up with new ways to spend money we have to cut spending. Cutting spending means cutting entitlements because that's where the real money is spent. |
| |
04-19-08, 09:53 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Professor
Join Date: Aug 2005 Last Online: 11-16-08 12:01 PM
Posts: 2,095
Thanks: 44
Thanked 116 Times in 95 Posts
Current Mood: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by missypea McCain told reporters Monday he was working on alternative legislation aimed at ensuring that troops do not leave the military earlier than planned to go to college.
| We should bring the troops home and go back to the "peacetime" GI bill, uh, like the one they had during the Carter administration when I went to Military "A" School with Iranians in Memphis, when Afghanistan was invaded by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, when Socialist Saddam usurped power, and when I twiddled my thumbs in the barracks during the Ayatollah Khomeini's 444 days of glory in Iran.
Actually, I am with the "liberals" on this one, so slap me, someone please slap me...
I don't care if they get out after four years, damn hell, with all the lack of support for their mission they all deserve a freaking house and a college degree. Who is going to pay for it? If that is the question:
Bring the troops home right freaking now and transfer assets to maintaining a Navy. That will pay for it.
__________________ “[59.14] They will not fight against you in a body save in fortified towns or from behind walls; their fighting between them is severe, you may think them as one body, and their hearts are disunited; that is because they are a people who have no sense.”
Yeah, a wall and a border patrol will protect us. {sound of laughter} |
| |
04-19-08, 10:22 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Upper West Side Jacobin
Join Date: Aug 2005 Last Online: Today 03:29 AM Location: Philly, "The City that shoves you back!"
Posts: 8,262
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,426 Times in 1,028 Posts
Gender:  | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatuey There has to be a reason for this. I'm not saying it didn't happen but is there something about the bill McCain didn't like? | presumably the cost |
| |
04-19-08, 10:27 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | DCKRIDN YUR TARDZ
Join Date: Feb 2008 Last Online: Today 01:26 AM Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 269
Thanked 310 Times in 186 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by DivineComedy Bring the troops home right freaking now and transfer assets to maintaining a Navy. That will pay for it. | You mean *gasp* use the fact that most military threats have to come at us over the ocean to reduce our military spending while simultaneously protecting our nation from outside attack?
Yeah, pretty much.
I figure between the Navy -- complete with carrier groups -- and the Marines, we really don't need squat all else for personal use.
__________________ DURKA DURKA JIHAD
"No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent."
-- Abraham Lincoln |
| |
04-19-08, 10:52 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Educator
Join Date: Jan 2007 Last Online: Today 01:24 AM
Posts: 1,232
Thanks: 469
Thanked 359 Times in 249 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by aegyptos You want to take money away from serving soldier to give it to veterans? Does that really make sense? | The military budget also funds operations, equipment, etc. Why did you immediately think of taking away from salaries? Quote: |
How are you holding him accountable?
| Right, obviously no one is holding him accountable. Quote: |
That train left the station when the troops went into Iraq.
| More than that, it's a train wreck. “Measured in blood and treasure, the war in Iraq has achieved the status of a major war and a major debacle,” according to this week's National Defense University report, and "the outcome is in doubt." Quote: |
The troops will be in Iraq for many years if not decades to come. Think of the future not the past.
| IOW, get used to it? Is there no way to end the debacle? Do you know something the rest of us don't?
__________________ When I despair, I remember that all through history, the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall - think of it, always.---Mahatma Gandhi |
| |
04-19-08, 11:11 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Young Money Millionaire
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Today 02:01 AM
Posts: 13,159
Thanks: 2,819
Thanked 3,127 Times in 1,992 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan You mean *gasp* use the fact that most military threats have to come at us over the ocean to reduce our military spending while simultaneously protecting our nation from outside attack?
Yeah, pretty much.
I figure between the Navy -- complete with carrier groups -- and the Marines, we really don't need squat all else for personal use. | The problem with this is that even terrorists have realized that they don't have to face our military to win. Just go around it. Case and point 9/11. Which is why I believe STRONGLY that good police work has stopped more terrorism then ANY multi billion dollar war ever has. Case and point the UK, Canada and so many others who's police officers have identified and neutralized threats long before they had a chance to strike.
__________________ Is Intolerant Because He Won't Let The Intolerant Run Other People's Lives. |
| |
04-20-08, 12:12 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007 Last Online: 11-13-08 07:43 PM
Posts: 1,785
Thanks: 115
Thanked 317 Times in 236 Posts
Awards: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda The military budget also funds operations, equipment, etc. Why did you immediately think of taking away from salaries? | So you want to take away the troop's equipment and ops funds? Do you think that's wise? I'm sure the enemy would love to attack soldiers who don't have fuel or ammo. Could get messy. I know I'll do everything I can to make sure the democrats are blamed for the deaths that follow from the your party taking away funds from the troops. Obviously no democrat can stand to be accused of killing soldiers for poltitical reasons so it won't happen. Quote: |
IOW, get used to it? Is there no way to end the debacle? Do you know something the rest of us don't?
| I don't think I know anything you can't know but yeah, get used to it. Get used to America soldiers dying in Iraq for many years to come - all through the next presidency for instance. |
| |
04-20-08, 12:46 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | DCKRIDN YUR TARDZ
Join Date: Feb 2008 Last Online: Today 01:26 AM Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 269
Thanked 310 Times in 186 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatuey The problem with this is that even terrorists have realized that they don't have to face our military to win. Just go around it. Case and point 9/11. Which is why I believe STRONGLY that good police work has stopped more terrorism then ANY multi billion dollar war ever has. Case and point the UK, Canada and so many others who's police officers have identified and neutralized threats long before they had a chance to strike. | Emphasis mine.
I believe you are correct. Within our own borders we have to depend on our police, since the military is not allowed to act in such a capacity on our soil.
That's why I specified military threats, versus threats in general. Military threats come in the form of armies and planes and boats. |
| |
04-20-08, 12:53 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Educator
Join Date: Jan 2007 Last Online: Today 01:24 AM
Posts: 1,232
Thanks: 469
Thanked 359 Times in 249 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Quote:
Originally Posted by aegyptos So you want to take away the troop's equipment and ops funds? | No. Equipment and operations are broad terms. Quote: |
all through the next presidency for instance.
| I agree, Republicans will steal this election, too. |
| |
04-20-08, 07:42 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007 Last Online: 11-13-08 07:43 PM
Posts: 1,785
Thanks: 115
Thanked 317 Times in 236 Posts
Awards: | Re: McCain refuses to sign on to GI Bill Any time a repub has won since Reagan its been a stolen election, hasn't it? |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |