There have been two extremely frightening and disturbing yet 'smallish' news stories recently.
The 1st is that there is a push to give politicians and the govt more control over the economy. It's a bad sign that people think we are so close to disaster that we need someone to be mucking about w/ it. More alarming than that is the fact that so many so-called conservatives (GWB's 'big-govt conservatives'

) are willing to silently embrace such an antithetical anathema to conservatism. [Did I mention that neo-conservatism has communist and socialist roots?] Most alarming of all though is the the track record of such experiments in govt planning and control of a national economy.
The 2nd is that the DHS is going to involve itself in common, domestic, criminal matters. It's a bad sign that people think we are so close to disaster that we need a police force who needs no warrants to protect us. More alarming than that is the fact that so many so-called conservatives (GWB's 'big-govt conservatives'

) are willing to silently embrace such an antithetical anathema to conservatism. [Did I mention that neo-conservatism has communist and socialist roots?] Most alarming of all though is the the track record of such experiments where the electorate lacks protections against the state.
I s'pose if one is willing to trust politicians, then he has nothing to worry about. however, if one is suspicious of politicians and dubious of their systems to fix things, then he has cause for great concern.
As I've said before, I harbor fleeting concerns that one day a person who is something less than sterling may slip past the voters or be accidentally appointed to a public trust. One day a politician who puts his own interests and the interests of those who ply him with funds and favors above the best interests of the Americans he serves could find his way into a public trust.