• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is the most corrupt? Colin Powell Or the Clintons?

This has my vote for the all time, hands-down, worst thread ever.

A misspelled thread title, inane chatter from the left and right sides of the aisle, and in the end, nothing meaningful stands to be accomplished.

OP, you really seem like a nice person, but I would go back and flush this smoking turd of a thread right down the toilet, and perhaps start all over again with a more clean and elegant approach.

Thanks in advance!

:2razz:


if you have logic you can understand all of this... if you do not then you will have problems in all areas....
 
the polls are showing trumps supporters are more wise than the hillary supporters


trump has the higher income supporters..... hillary has lower income supporters WITH EXTRA student debt because she has more college grads..... but its the income that proves who are the true wise ....
 
this is the part of the leaked emails that proves powell totally corrupt ALSO

///////////////////

In one exchange days before, on Aug. 24, Powell appears to suggest that he made a compromise of sorts with Mills regarding his public comments on the email issue.

“I told you we wouldn’t say any more,” Powell told Mills.

But he added that he was forced to continue discussing the issue after his assistant, Peggy Cifrino, became embroiled in an argument with Conason over his claim that Powell advised Clinton to use personal email at the 2009 dinner party.

In an Aug. 19 email, Powell told his correspondent that he tried to “warn [Clinton’s] people three times.”

“I will send an even tougher counterattack from a Trump media friend,” he added.

///////////////

that shows powell was working to cover up all this IF IF they did not expose HIM..... then they did expose him and he then says he will counter attack with the one he called a national disgrace.... TRUMP's TEAM...

powell endorsed obama because of race.... he lied and said he did not... even when he has never endorsed a white liberal democrat

powell then must have said OK to obama for hillary the monster crook for sec of state

then powell covered up for hillary and obama by saying the bengazhi hearings a witch hunt

then powell tries to help obama and hillary with saying trump is a national disgrace

all this shows that powell is indeed a national disgrace... by playing a backscratcher game of cover up and lying
 
if you have logic you can understand all of this... if you do not then you will have problems in all areas....

Oh my intuitions, education, and high IQ all add up to a high degree of logical, critical thinking skills.
I'm not concerned about that, quite honestly.

And please, do not take offense at my earlier (spot-on) bit of advice.
This truly is a very bad web forum thread, from top to bottom.

I see that the misspelled thread title was fixed, either by yourself or by a moderator.
Kudos on that.
(And you are welcome, by the way. I reported the misspelling earlier, and requested most politely that somebody fix the error.)

That aside, the thread is still an inferior one.
Allow me to detail the reasons why:

* An a.-to-b., side-by-side comparison of Hillary Clinton and GEN Colin Powell doesn't even make sense, as regards corruption.
Clearly, Hillary has an enormous track record of corrupt dealings and shenanigans, going back many years, while the good General is merely a run-of-the-mill political figure with very few black marks against his character.

* No offense, but your opening dialogue, the very first posting in this thread, was not well-thought-out, nor were your main points articulated very well.

* In very short order, the banter back and forth degenerated into the typical 'left versus right', partisan-political nonsense.
There is a conspicuous lack of intellectual honesty here, but rather mostly a lot of 'nanny-nanny-boo-boo, your side sucks' dialogue.

I repeat, there's nothing meaningful being accomplished here.

And I'm only looking out for your web forum reputation, by the way.
You should thank me, quite honestly.

Friends now?
:)
 
Oh my intuitions, education, and high IQ all add up to a high degree of logical, critical thinking skills.
I'm not concerned about that, quite honestly.

And please, do not take offense at my earlier (spot-on) bit of advice.
This truly is a very bad web forum thread, from top to bottom.

I see that the misspelled thread title was fixed, either by yourself or by a moderator.
Kudos on that.
(And you are welcome, by the way. I reported the misspelling earlier, and requested most politely that somebody fix the error.)

That aside, the thread is still an inferior one.
Allow me to detail the reasons why:

* An a.-to-b., side-by-side comparison of Hillary Clinton and GEN Colin Powell doesn't even make sense, as regards corruption.
Clearly, Hillary has an enormous track record of corrupt dealings and shenanigans, going back many years, while the good General is merely a run-of-the-mill political figure with very few black marks against his character.

* No offense, but your opening dialogue, the very first posting in this thread, was not well-thought-out, nor were your main points articulated very well.

* In very short order, the banter back and forth degenerated into the typical 'left versus right', partisan-political nonsense.
There is a conspicuous lack of intellectual honesty here, but rather mostly a lot of 'nanny-nanny-boo-boo, your side sucks' dialogue.

I repeat, there's nothing meaningful being accomplished here.

And I'm only looking out for your web forum reputation, by the way.
You should thank me, quite honestly.

Friends now?
:)

if you have true logic you would then call for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters... if not you are simply a wannabe
 
if you have true logic you would then call for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters... if not you are simply a wannabe

and with logic you can pick out what powell is all about...... like powell said he did not endorse obama because of race.... even when he has never endorsed a liberal white person....logic picks out clues that proves important points
 
if you have true logic you would then call for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters... if not you are simply a wannabe

I would support such a thing.
I would also support drug screening for potential voters.
And an IQ test for potential voters.
And of course, a photo ID for all voters, in every State.

But NONE of those things are going to happen in this touchy-feely-kinder-gentler 'welfare State' society.
We can both agree on that, can't we?
:(
 
the polls are showing trumps supporters are more wise than the hillary supporters


trump has the higher income supporters..... hillary has lower income supporters WITH EXTRA student debt because she has more college grads..... but its the income that proves who are the true wise ....

Lol what po's? Your spew makes no sense, and is also nonsense. You offer nothing intelligent to discuss, because there is nothing to discuss. Your comparison of Colin Powell's (so-called) corruption to Hillary Clinton's blatant corruption - and your incorrect postulation that Trump is somehow more of a nationalist than Hillary Clinton - goes to show your obvious lack of information and knowledge regarding the subject of geopolitics. I laugh at your faux-thread, and your lack of knowledge regarding geopolitics.
 
I would support such a thing.
I would also support drug screening for potential voters.
And an IQ test for potential voters.
And of course, a photo ID for all voters, in every State.

But NONE of those things are going to happen in this touchy-feely-kinder-gentler 'welfare State' society.
We can both agree on that, can't we?
:(
how long have you called for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters??? how long?? lets see if you are truly wise or a wannabe.... how long??? people can tell you i have called for this since i came here and nearly every day

this is the single most important issue...


how long have you called for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters ???
 
I would support such a thing.
I would also support drug screening for potential voters.
And an IQ test for potential voters.
And of course, a photo ID for all voters, in every State.

But NONE of those things are going to happen in this touchy-feely-kinder-gentler 'welfare State' society.
We can both agree on that, can't we?
:(

you saying a IQ test proves low logic thinking ability and just a wannabe...

the part that voting requires is LOGIC.... there are 2 parts to the IQ scores.... one is memory and the other logic.... one can have a high IQ but a low logical thinking ability.... for voting that then takes the high logical thinking ability.... so you have no idea what you are saying
 
you saying a IQ test proves low logic thinking ability and just a wannabe...
the part that voting requires is LOGIC.... there are 2 parts to the IQ scores.... one is memory and the other logic.... one can have a high IQ but a low logical thinking ability.... for voting that then takes the high logical thinking ability.... so you have no idea what you are saying

You seem to be rambling, friend.

That said, your typing with no regard for the rules of punctuation, grammar, or upper/lower case has me concerned;

How is your health?
Are you at risk of a stroke or heart attack?

Humor me.
Speak a complete sentence.
Raise your arms above your head.
Smile.

Are you okay?
Is there anybody in the house to check on you?
:(
 
You seem to be rambling, friend.

That said, your typing with no regard for the rules of punctuation, grammar, or upper/lower case has me concerned;

How is your health?
Are you at risk of a stroke or heart attack?

Humor me.
Speak a complete sentence.
Raise your arms above your head.
Smile.

Are you okay?
Is there anybody in the house to check on you?
:(

Einstein would horse laugh you out of the building thinking you were wise with remembering grammar like a parrot

understanding and inventing and predicting is the true wisdom.. and if people do not call for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters THEY then have failed a logical thinking ability TEST
 
You seem to be rambling, friend.

That said, your typing with no regard for the rules of punctuation, grammar, or upper/lower case has me concerned;

How is your health?
Are you at risk of a stroke or heart attack?

Humor me.
Speak a complete sentence.
Raise your arms above your head.
Smile.

Are you okay?
Is there anybody in the house to check on you?
:(

you didn't know about IQ's and didn't know what brings success.... with that you cannot PREDICT and cannot have success....

but yes you call parrots the ones with the real wisdom because they can copy.. even if they copy nothing of value ..
 
look close and you are about to see a 3 ring circus of corruption

the clintons..... colin powell .. and obama

they are now fighting each other with each ones corruption...

powell had already lied about he did not endorse obama because of race.... but him never endorsing a white liberal democrat proves other wise

powell then Ok's to obama to have the worst criminal ever in politics as his sec of state... hillary

powell then helps to push obama and hillary by saying the bengazhi hearings was a witch hunt
powell then helps obama and criminal hillary by saying TRUMP is a national disgrace


BUT BUT BUT now the email leaks has come and he is threatening the clintons and even threatening them with the one he CALLED a NATIONAL DISGRACE... TRUMP.....

this is about to get very ugly.....the clintons... colin powell and Obama
 
Are any observations of racism valid, or are they all just "playing the race card"?
LOOK close and you can see a 3 ring circus of corruption that is backfiring...... the clintons... colin Powell and Obama

the email leaks has exposed this corrupt 3 some with them coming together to push each others corrupt agenda
 
LOOK close and you can see a 3 ring circus of corruption that is backfiring...... the clintons... colin Powell and Obama

the email leaks has exposed this corrupt 3 some with them coming together to push each others corrupt agenda
The only person more corrupt than Trump is his bromance partner Putin.
 
This here shows proof that colin powell as an outrageous con artist and liar

///////////////////

Clinton sought Powell’s advice at a dinner on June 16, 2009, at former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s house, according to the emails. Powell gave Clinton “written guidance on why and how [he] had been doing it.” Also in attendance were former secretaries of state Condoleezza Rice, Lawrence Eagleburger, George Schultz, Warren Christopher, James Baker, and Henry Kissinger.

///////////////

those emails shows powell WAS giving written instructions at the sec of state party..... BEFORE this leaked proof... powell said he did not re call any of that...... BUT he must have known that he would be proven a liar when there were several there who could verify.... all those names NOW know powell is a total liar.... because they were there..

powell is so mad to get caught this way... but now with these leaked emails proving he was lying like a dog he cannot ever recover..... he is so mad at being exposed.... BUT he really exposed himself when he must have OK'd hillary as sec of state... a person with a RAP SHEET A MILE LONG....It looks like powell and obama wanted to have MORE COVER with bringing another criminal and con artist... all 3 were up to working each ones corrupt agenda.....now we will sit back and watch the fights between those 3
 
Back
Top Bottom