• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton’s emails reveal evidence that George W. Bush committed treason

jmotivator said:
You are a hypocrite no matter how hard you believe your hypocrisy.

It is a straw man to attribute an argument to me I never made.

And what makes Politifact an expert on Iraqi Weapons?

Hmmm... and if that was the only justification you'd still be lying. The NIE publish in the lead up to war had made no such conclusion, THe French offered the US Naji Sabri, part of Saddam's inner circle, who told the CIA that Saddam was seeking to start a nuclear program... and the Germans played a part in the justification for war as well.

You are big on baseless absolutes, short on truth.

No, it's not black and white, your absurd absolutes while making claims that your evidence doesn't even fully back makes your effort self defeating.

I gave you time because I thought you had thought about the subject, even if you settled on the Atlantic as your favorite source, but it is clear you are not really of much use.
Click to expand...

Politifact got the pulitzer prize. They are only after the facts. That's why republicans hate them, the pesky facts undermine their completely unfounded propaganda.

You bring up Curveball to back your case?

The CIA was warned that he was not reliable. We had reliable sources that completely countered the unreliable alcoholic nobody "Curveball."

We knew that Saddam wanted WMDs. Why don't you read the Atlantic article? It explains this to you in vivid detail. He was all bark and no bite. The whole world knew it, especially our own CIA.
 
danarhea said:
That was before 911. After 911 happened, the Taliban decided to protect bin Laden, which meant going to war in Afghanistan. While I was against the Iraq war, the Afghan war was a good call by Bush. Problem is, we attempted to do a makeover, and make Afghanistan an American client state. We should have just gone in, taken bin Laden and his cohorts out, carpet bombed all the bases, then gotten out. That would have accomplished our goal, while reminding our enemies that America is not to be messed with if they wish to live.
Click to expand...

You seem to have forgotten that OBL was our guy. And that his family and the Bush Family do business together.

We were all deceived. Deception and secrecy are the modus operandi of the federal government, especially the Pentagon.
 
Absentglare said:
Having some doubt "we don't know for a fact that Saddam has no active WMD program," is a completely different claim than Dick Cheney's impetus for war "Simply put, there is no doubt that Saddam has WMDs and will use them on us."

See how the "there is no doubt" COMPLETELY CONFLICTS with your own sources ?

I never said those reports were lies. Why don't you ask why Hans was against an invasion ? Why was the UN against an invasion ? Because there was insufficient evidence to justify an invasion. That's why the war on Iraq was an illegal war of aggression per UN law. We were in no danger. Our allies were in no danger.
Click to expand...

LOL

As usual: :eek:uch:
 
I haven't read all of the articles linked in this thread but I have read all the comments.

It looks to me like the Democratic party and their worshipers are blaming the Intelligence Community for the Iraq invasion and Benghazi.

Wonder how that makes the Intelligence Community feel?
 
Mr. Blackwell said:
I haven't read all of the articles linked in this thread but I have read all the comments.

It looks to me like the Democratic party and their worshipers are blaming the Intelligence Community for the Iraq invasion and Benghazi.

Wonder how that makes the Intelligence Community feel?
Click to expand...

Feel free to read the Atlantic articles that explain in vivid detail that the IC was manipulated by President Bush 2's administration to build a false case for war.
 
Absentglare said:
Feel free to read the Atlantic articles that explain in vivid detail that the IC was manipulated by President Bush 2's administration to build a false case for war.
Click to expand...

You provided three links to articles from the Atlantic. Which one talks about how the IC was manipulated by Bush 2 to build a false case for war?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom