• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton Defnds herself over her server and Emails.....

the I didn't inhale excuse isn't going to work like it did for her husband.
 
Moot said:
Too bad liberals aren't as vindictive as conservatives or the entire Bush administration would be sitting in prison by now.
Click to expand...

The entire Bush administration should be sitting in prison!

Dammit... ask yourself: why did Nancy Pelosi take impeachment off the table?

Do you believe that happy horsesh*t about "it would have been too divisive"?

What do we have here, a protected class? Politicians are somehow immune from prison? They get to play nicey-nice with each other so each other don't go to jail?

This is our elitist government? Our oligarchy? Newsflash Moot, it doesn't matter who you vote for under those conditions. They're going to rob you blind anyway, it doesn't matter which party happens to be in power at any given moment.

Learn your lesson from history. This is a classic situation, it's happened over and over again. What happens when you have two regional mob bosses, and they both end up competing for the same territory? Did you ever see the Star Trek classic, "A Piece Of The Action"? That's what happens.

ariane179254_StarTrek_2x17_APieceOfTheAction_2447.jpg


The competing mob bosses don't kill each other off in territorial wars, that would be stupid, it would be a lose/lose. What good is a million dollar racket if you're dead?

And the competing mob bosses don't collaborate either, because they don't trust each other.

No... what it takes, is for someone else to step in, and force the mob bosses to collaborate. Don't make it too hard on 'em either, just tax 'em "a little", just take a tiny little piece of the action. A tiny little cut, just a smidgeon of a vig.

And what happens next? Suddenly, to everyone except a few in the know, the mob suddenly turns into a syndicate, and you suddenly see the two competing mob bosses smiling at each other in the newspapers.

But you never see Kirk and Spock, in the newspapers or anywhere else. Especially Spock - you never see the logic behind the play-acting.
 
ballantine said:
The entire Bush administration should be sitting in prison!

Dammit... ask yourself: why did Nancy Pelosi take impeachment off the table?

Do you believe that happy horsesh*t about "it would have been too divisive"?

What do we have here, a protected class? Politicians are somehow immune from prison? They get to play nicey-nice with each other so each other don't go to jail?

This is our elitist government? Our oligarchy? Newsflash Moot, it doesn't matter who you vote for under those conditions. They're going to rob you blind anyway, it doesn't matter which party happens to be in power at any given moment.

Learn your lesson from history. This is a classic situation, it's happened over and over again. What happens when you have two regional mob bosses, and they both end up competing for the same territory? Did you ever see the Star Trek classic, "A Piece Of The Action"? That's what happens.

http://www.trekcaps.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/16/tos-update-11/ariane179254_StarTrek_2x17_APieceOfTheAction_2447.jpg[img]

The competing mob bosses don't kill each other off in territorial wars, that would be stupid, it would be a lose/lose. What good is a million dollar racket if you're dead?

And the competing mob bosses don't collaborate either, because they don't trust each other.

No... what it takes, is for someone [u]else[/u] to step in, and [u]force[/u] the mob bosses to collaborate. Don't make it too hard on 'em either, just tax 'em "a little", just take a tiny little piece of the action. A tiny little cut, just a smidgeon of a vig.

And what happens next? Suddenly, to everyone except a few in the know, the mob suddenly turns into a [u]syndicate[/u], and you suddenly see the two competing mob bosses smiling at each other in the newspapers.

But you never see Kirk and Spock, in the newspapers or anywhere else. Especially Spock - you never see the logic behind the play-acting.[/QUOTE]

I think Pelosi took impeachment off the table because it would be too divisive, waste taxpayer money and hurt the country. I guess we're not like Egypt....but if conservatives have their way...we will be.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
ballantine said:
Hi MMC. You've touched on a key issue here, it's worth elaborating.

What you're saying is impossible, one can not "clean out the government" from all of Hillary's flunkies. Or Bush's, or anyone else's.

Government employees are specifically protected from that kind of thing. They can't be "fired for political reasons". Once they're hired, it's very difficult to get rid of them.

You can't simply "clean out the career bureaucrats", the law doesn't allow such a thing.
Click to expand...


They can for incompetency. Yeah, they have a Union to.

Once one has the power.....I think they can be given an offer they won't refuse.

I am willing to assist in this endeavor. Give me, say a month. :2razz:

th
 
MaggieD said:
I'm guessing she's playing The Never Let Them See You Sweat Card. We'll have to see if it works. She plays it well.
Click to expand...

It ain't working. :)

“When did she decide to delete all — you know, half of the emails she effectively engaged in during her four years as secretary of state,” Wolf Blitzer asked Palmieri.

“She had her, um, she had — what happened was she — state department came to all the former secretaries of state last fall to ask for — to ask for whatever records they may have because they realized that, um, uh, they didn’t becau- because, uh, not just Hillary Clinton but other secretaries of state may have used personal email they may not have captured everything.

“So she had, she asked, uh, her lawyers to look at this so she had some legal minds on the case to see which emails were state department and which were personal and, uh, turned over the state department ones, uh, anything that was business related and, and then chose not to retain the ones that she, the ones that were personal,” Palmieri said.

“On that point,” Blitzer responded, “why wouldn’t she want to keep her own email records — maybe there were some fun, cute emails — why would she need to wipe all that clean?”

“She deglided, um, because she didn’t, I mean, these are, these are personal emails and I think that everyone understands even Hillary Clinton gets a zone of privacy and she decided that she, uh, she retains a couple months-worth of emails so you can, you know, so she can, uh, uh, find personal emails she needs to but after that, she doesn’t need them anymore. So, she made this decision, I think is, obviously, you know, she was former secretary of state, so we want to be sure people understand, uh, how she handled classified information when shew as secretary of state, she was very careful with it, she didn’t deal with it online, she dealt with it on hard copy, in meetings, not on the computer,” Palmieri said.
 
NonoBadDog said:
It ain't working. :)

“When did she decide to delete all — you know, half of the emails she effectively engaged in during her four years as secretary of state,” Wolf Blitzer asked Palmieri.

“She had her, um, she had — what happened was she — state department came to all the former secretaries of state last fall to ask for — to ask for whatever records they may have because they realized that, um, uh, they didn’t becau- because, uh, not just Hillary Clinton but other secretaries of state may have used personal email they may not have captured everything.

“So she had, she asked, uh, her lawyers to look at this so she had some legal minds on the case to see which emails were state department and which were personal and, uh, turned over the state department ones, uh, anything that was business related and, and then chose not to retain the ones that she, the ones that were personal,” Palmieri said.

“On that point,” Blitzer responded, “why wouldn’t she want to keep her own email records — maybe there were some fun, cute emails — why would she need to wipe all that clean?”

“She deglided, um, because she didn’t, I mean, these are, these are personal emails and I think that everyone understands even Hillary Clinton gets a zone of privacy and she decided that she, uh, she retains a couple months-worth of emails so you can, you know, so she can, uh, uh, find personal emails she needs to but after that, she doesn’t need them anymore. So, she made this decision, I think is, obviously, you know, she was former secretary of state, so we want to be sure people understand, uh, how she handled classified information when shew as secretary of state, she was very careful with it, she didn’t deal with it online, she dealt with it on hard copy, in meetings, not on the computer,” Palmieri said.
Click to expand...




Heya NBD. :2wave: She isn't doing so well for a spokesperson for Hillary. Communications Director is suppose to be her specialty, Right.
but.gif
One of Hillary's advisors, Right?
hmmm.gif
She was hoping for WH Press Secretary, huh?
think.gif
 
MMC said:
Heya NBD. :2wave: She isn't doing so well for a spokesperson for Hillary. Communications Director is suppose to be her specialty, Right.
but.gif
One of Hillary's advisors, Right?
hmmm.gif
She was hoping for WH Press Secretary, huh?
think.gif
Click to expand...

It's pretty entertaining to watch all this going on.

:yt

 
The FBI still hasn't found any incriminating evidence and Hillary still hasn't been charged with a crime.
 
Moot said:
The FBI still hasn't found any incriminating evidence and Hillary still hasn't been charged with a crime.
Click to expand...

Be patient.....its coming, they are taking their time. Giving up secrets of National Security is a crime. Doesn't even matter if it is unintentional. So they want to get this Right. As the Damage of the hacks into the State Dept and White House by the Russians and Chinese is very serious.

Now a Federal Judge has said she is just an employee who broke government policy.
 
Clinton email dump day tomorrow.
 
Well there goes Hillary's defense over her server. Now she is saying she didn't know there was another Tech firm handling her emails. Once again she is lying!



Drip: Unauthorized Subcontractors Stored Hillary Emails on 'The Cloud,' Targeted With Cyber Attacks......


Yesterday, we learned that a second IT company -- beyond this infamous case -- had possession of the data on Hillary Clinton's private email server, which violated government rules and compromised national security. As the new editor-in-chief of Red State, Leon Wolf, noted, this new development raised serious new issues regarding the security and integrity of her sensitive data. As you read this excerpt, remember that officials have already identified hundreds of classified emails in her archives (she said there were none) -- including messages that she personally sent and received (she said she hadn't done so), as well as work-related emails that she never turned over (she swore she'd surrendered every single one):

Today, another revelation:

A Connecticut company, which backed up Hillary Clinton‘s emails at the request of a Colorado firm, apparently surprised her aides by storing the emails on a “cloud” storage system designed to optimize data recovery.....snip~

Drip: Unauthorized Subcontractors Stored Hillary Emails on 'The Cloud,' Targeted With Cyber Attacks - Guy Benson
 
MMC said:
Well there goes Hillary's defense over her server. Now she is saying she didn't know there was another Tech firm handling her emails. Once again she is lying!



Drip: Unauthorized Subcontractors Stored Hillary Emails on 'The Cloud,' Targeted With Cyber Attacks......


Yesterday, we learned that a second IT company -- beyond this infamous case -- had possession of the data on Hillary Clinton's private email server, which violated government rules and compromised national security. As the new editor-in-chief of Red State, Leon Wolf, noted, this new development raised serious new issues regarding the security and integrity of her sensitive data. As you read this excerpt, remember that officials have already identified hundreds of classified emails in her archives (she said there were none) -- including messages that she personally sent and received (she said she hadn't done so), as well as work-related emails that she never turned over (she swore she'd surrendered every single one):

Today, another revelation:

A Connecticut company, which backed up Hillary Clinton‘s emails at the request of a Colorado firm, apparently surprised her aides by storing the emails on a “cloud” storage system designed to optimize data recovery.....snip~

Drip: Unauthorized Subcontractors Stored Hillary Emails on 'The Cloud,' Targeted With Cyber Attacks - Guy Benson
Click to expand...

Drip, drip drip, and it only gets worse and worse for Hillary and her distant and standoffish relationship with the truth.
 
eohrnberger said:
Drip, drip drip, and it only gets worse and worse for Hillary and her distant and standoffish relationship with the truth.
Click to expand...

Can you believe this EB. They stored her emails on the Cloud. :doh
 
MMC said:
Can you believe this EB. They stored her emails on the Cloud. :doh
Click to expand...

Yeah, geez. That's like putting them in the Internet bargain bin for picking and choosing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom