• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP Congressman Say Obama's Hesitance on Iran Responsible for Violence

The congressman comments that the op refers too is just as delerious and disgusting as (Fox News) great entertainer (the crap master)Nugents actions.

This congressman is just spewing more bile.
 
Hey Chis Mathews had the smarts and intelligence to recognize a good person when he sees it.

Now Beck's and Hannity's love of Nugent and Fox News love of Nugent is quite another thing.

Personally I think Nugent is a fine representative for the current values of the RightWingers and he should be their representative at all future Rightwing rallies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ted Nugent Befouled Himself to Avoid Vietnam Draft

Pensito Review Ted Nugent Befouled Himself to Avoid Vietnam Draft


So Ted Nugent roams a concert stage while toting automatic weapons, calls Barack Obama “a piece of —–” and says he told Obama to suck on one of his machine-guns. He also calls Hillary Clinton a “worthless bitch” and Dianne Feinstein a “worthless whore.”

That Nugent, he’s a man’s man. He talks the talk and walks the walk, right?

Except when it was time to register for the draft during the Vietnam era. By his own admission, Nugent stopped all forms of personal hygiene for a month and showed up for his draft board physical in pants caked with his own urine and feces, winning a deferment. Creative!

_______________________________________________________________

Perhaps Beck and Hannity should have check out this loons background before the hump his leg and invite him to represent them a rallies.

Ted "the crap master" Nugent.

Alright then, I take it we're open to nastiness from the pundits and entertainers now, too. Can't possibly win this one if it's about who is the nastier.

Way to move the goal posts around. I knew you couldn't confine yourself to any boundaries when there's a pile of **** to fling just on the other side.
 
Premium health insurance can be bought for about 180 a month for a healthy person up to about age 35. So no, it's not bs. Your experience does not equate to evidence.

A more just society isn't one that robs the responsible of what they earn to give it to those who did not earn it nor have any entitlement to it.

You problem is you equate "responsible" with those with money. there are plenty out there that are "responsible" but just can't catch a break. Once again, you don't want to understand poverty.
 
You problem is you equate "responsible" with those with money. there are plenty out there that are "responsible" but just can't catch a break. Once again, you don't want to understand poverty.

For the poor people out there whom next statement does not apply to, I'm sorry.

Grow up! Most people who are poor are poor because they made poor financial choices. Whether that means they overloaded 15 credit cards when they were 18 or they took out a loan they couldn't pay back today, they still demonstrated a lack of financial reponsibility. How is it fair that those of us who have managed our money responsibly should have to pay for their lack of responsibility?
 
You problem is you equate "responsible" with those with money.

No, I equate responsible choices with being responsible.

there are plenty out there that are "responsible" but just can't catch a break. Once again, you don't want to understand poverty.

There's the problem right there...life isn't about "catching a break". It is about making proper choices and creating the "breaks" for yourself.

I understand poverty just fine having lived in poverty all through college and afterward just to better myself.
 
Frankly, I don't understand what people (Reps/Conservs) expect President Obama to do about the Iranian presidential election. They make it seem like our president has such great influence over another country's electoral process. We don't!

Moreover, it's not like whatever we (the U.S.) says is going to change the vote count nor should it.

It's like this, folks...

We speak of democracy, but it would be very hypocritical of us to get involved in another country's electoral process. And it's not like any other country came to our aid during the 2000/2004 presidental elections. Some may have been very concerned over who the next U.S. president would be just so they'd know who they had to deal with for the next four years, but that was it. Ironically, the world now finds itself in that same position...in "waiting" mode.

The situation unfolding (barely) before our eye in Iran is substaintually different. What you have here is social, political, religious but above all human rights issues all changing, all evolving in Iran at the same time. How does one on the outside looking in step into that w/o fully understand how events will unfold?

I think our president has done the right thing on this matter to date. He has condemned the violence from the beginning and he has cautioned on the possibility of voter fraud. What more can he say on these two key issues w/o risking further hampering international relations between the U.S. and Iran, i.e., the Iranian government (and its religious leaders) blaming the U.S. for insighting the violence in their own country further damaging U.S./Iranian relations?

This is one of those issues you ultimately have to let play out before you can really do anything other than highly suggest a full recount* and condemn the violence.

*A full recount is something I'm sure many people want the President to come out and state, but honestly if he were to make such a statement it would wrongfully feed the perception that the U.S. is "meddling" in the electoral process of a foreign country, and that's NOT something this country should give any ammunition towards. Condemn the violence, but that's it. All the world can do is hope that the demonstrations push the Iranian government into calling for a full recount at the very least; and at the most that their ideology changes to listen to the voice of their people more.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom