Billboards in Florida Link Democrats to Burning World Trade Center - Page 5

aps · 07-23-08, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jallman

I didn't say it's all their fault. There you go again attributing arguments I didn't make. I said that it is a reasonable association because fault lies with the democrats. If you need me to spell it out and take it that step further just to ease your tender sensibilities, then I will.

Fault lies with the democrats just like it does with the republicans.

There, are you happy that I stated the obvious for you?

Hmmm, let's take a look at your post:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jallman

I don't see anything wrong with the ad. Democrats did nothing to make us safe and prevent the attacks on 9-11 so why not link them to the bombing? Plus, Clinton had Bin Laden dead to rights and did nothing about it. Seems like a pretty strong tie to me.

Osama Bin Laden: Missed Opportunities

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away

The "Democrats did nothing to . . . prevent the attacks on 9-11 so why not link them to the bombing?" And you describe it being a "pretty strong tie." Such statements are more than stating that there is a "reasonable association."

Anyway, your statement above about how Clinton was the President and thus represented the entire Democratic party is really stretching it, jallman. First of all, Bill Clinton was President from 1993 to 2000. We're in 2008. How you can impose what Clinton did or did not do back during that time period on the here and now is beyond my tender sensibilities. It makes no sense. Sorry, but we have had a Republican in the White House since January 2001. If we sustain another attack, are you going to blame the Democrats or Bill Clinton for such attack?

jallman · 07-23-08, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aps

Hmmm, let's take a look at your post:

The "Democrats did nothing to . . . prevent the attacks on 9-11 so why not link them to the bombing?" And you describe it being a "pretty strong tie." Such statements are more than stating that there is a "reasonable association."

Anyway, your statement above about how Clinton was the President and thus represented the entire Democratic party is really stretching it, jallman. First of all, Bill Clinton was President from 1993 to 2000.

Yes, Clinton was president from 1993 to 2000 and the bombing depicted on that billboard happened when? Your point about it being 2008 is irrelevant to the topic of the 9-11 bombing.

Now post something else for me to refute.

aps · 07-23-08, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jallman

Yes, Clinton was president from 1993 to 2000 and the bombing depicted on that billboard happened when? Your point about it being 2008 is irrelevant to the topic of the 9-11 bombing.

Now post something else for me to refute.

You think what you did was refute my post?

Bush was president when the 9-11 attacks occurred. Also, that billboard is for elections AFTER that incident. I'm sorry, but can you tell me how an occurrence that happened during Bush's watch is so closely linked to the Democrats--7 years later?

jallman · 07-23-08, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aps

You think what you did was refute my post?

I know that's what I did.

Quote:

Bush was president when the 9-11 attacks occurred. Also, that billboard is for elections AFTER that incident. I'm sorry, but can you tell me how an occurrence that happened during Bush's watch is so closely linked to the Democrats--7 years later?

For eight years Clinton didn't take the Bin Laden problem seriously. Eight years of inactivity is far more noticeable than 9 months.

And yes, it can be tied. Last time we had a commander in chief who was lax in his approach to national security, it was a democrat. In the aftermath of that period, we were attacked as depicted on that billboard. I don't want to go back to 7 years ago. The billboard makes that argument.

Get over it aps. The billboard makes a true statement. I am sorry you don't like the statement. There's a lot of statements about Bush I don't like either. Doesn't mean they aren't valid.

talloulou · 07-23-08, 03:53 PM

Did you ever read this interview?

It's crazy.

FULL TEXT of Bin Laden Interview, 1998 -- 'Ever since I can recall, I despised ... Americans'

jallman · 07-23-08, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talloulou

Did you ever read this interview?

It's crazy.

FULL TEXT of Bin Laden Interview, 1998 -- 'Ever since I can recall, I despised ... Americans'

And who was in office in 1998 while this was occurring? Uh-huh.

aps · 07-23-08, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jallman

I know that's what I did.

For eight years Clinton didn't take the Bin Laden problem seriously. Eight years of inactivity is far more noticeable than 9 months.

And yes, it can be tied. Last time we had a commander in chief who was lax in his approach to national security, it was a democrat. In the aftermath of that period, we were attacked as depicted on that billboard. I don't want to go back to 7 years ago. The billboard makes that argument.

Get over it aps. The billboard makes a true statement. I am sorry you don't like the statement. There's a lot of statements about Bush I don't like either. Doesn't mean they aren't valid.

Whatever, jallman. This is it for me. I am done dealing with you. You aren't the person who was posting way back when. You're condescending all the time. You're obnoxious on top of that. And you no longer exude the intelligent, sophisticated person that you used you. This kind of behavior is beneath me.

Buh-bye.

jallman · 07-24-08, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aps

Whatever, jallman. This is it for me. I am done dealing with you. You aren't the person who was posting way back when. You're condescending all the time. You're obnoxious on top of that. And you no longer exude the intelligent, sophisticated person that you used you. This kind of behavior is beneath me.

Buh-bye.

Good riddance. I get sick of your flying off the handle and going menstrual on anyone who doesn't agree with you. I am not bothered in the least that you find me obnoxious because it is a mutual feeling. You exude nothing but postpartum angst and emotional belches that make me think conversing with cat sick would be more productive and less offensive.

Like I said...good riddance.