| US Partisan Politics and Political Platforms Help me out here; A user here has argued that liberals are for
1) Small government
2) Low government spending
3) Getting government out ... |
07-13-08, 09:57 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Aiming Anti-Stupid Gun
Join Date: Apr 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 11:16 PM Location: Land of the Anti-Stupid
Posts: 1,911
Thanks: 52
Thanked 334 Times in 236 Posts
| Help me out here A user here has argued that liberals are for
1) Small government
2) Low government spending
3) Getting government out of our lives
And that Conservatives are for
1) Massive, huge government
2) Ridiculously obscene government spending
3) Large amounts of government in our lives
Now, I thought that conservatives were for the first list and liberals for the second, anyone willing to help me straighten this out?
__________________ "They are the key to my eventual rise to the throne. Why would I abandon them?"
"Because I have asked you. And because your loyalty to our people should be greater than your ambition. And because I have poisoned your drink." |
| |
07-13-08, 10:09 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | anti-ideological
Join Date: Jun 2007 Last Online: Today 06:21 PM
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 578
Thanked 506 Times in 359 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Conservatism is not an ideology. Conservatism can mean different things for different times. Conservatism is in fact the opposite or resistance to ideology when ideology promises to rapidly take society in a new radical direction for the betterment of all. Ideology of this sort has driven us to a massive government, huge spending & an intrusive government.
Classic liberalism is a belief in small government, low government spending & federalism. These are the objectives of the true modern Conservative. |
| |
07-13-08, 10:11 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Aiming Anti-Stupid Gun
Join Date: Apr 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 11:16 PM Location: Land of the Anti-Stupid
Posts: 1,911
Thanks: 52
Thanked 334 Times in 236 Posts
| Re: Help me out here Of course. I just think it's amusing when a pretend conservative who supports the monostrity of liberalism that is the Bush Administration calls someone who refutes them a liberal when the refuter clearly believes in actual modern American conservatism. |
| |
07-13-08, 10:13 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Vagina Dentata
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Today 05:51 PM
Posts: 11,703
Thanks: 3,092
Thanked 1,751 Times in 1,324 Posts
Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child A user here has argued that liberals are for
1) Small government
2) Low government spending
3) Getting government out of our lives
And that Conservatives are for
1) Massive, huge government
2) Ridiculously obscene government spending
3) Large amounts of government in our lives
Now, I thought that conservatives were for the first list and liberals for the second, anyone willing to help me straighten this out? |
Historically, conservatives were for smaller government, less government spending.
The past decade or more, this is no longer the case.
That's why some conservatives make a differentiation between "neocons" and
"traditional republicans" or "paleo-conservatives" or whatever.
Conservatives aren't really very conservative any longer, since they crawled into bed with the fundamentalist Christians and other shady characters.
__________________ "I do love this idea that one can scream and scream and scream, with that utopia just one more scream away."
~ Scucca |
| |
07-13-08, 10:17 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Aiming Anti-Stupid Gun
Join Date: Apr 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 11:16 PM Location: Land of the Anti-Stupid
Posts: 1,911
Thanks: 52
Thanked 334 Times in 236 Posts
| Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 Historically, conservatives were for smaller government, less government spending.
The past decade or more, this is no longer the case.
That's why some conservatives make a differentiation between "neocons" and
"traditional republicans" or "paleo-conservatives" or whatever. | The former conservatives who've abandoned the ideology can't be considered Conservatives. What kind of "Conservative" blackmails the FDA into lying about a multitrillion dollar socialistic drug bill? Oh wait, not a Conservative. Quote: |
Conservatives aren't really very conservative any longer, since they crawled into bed with the fundamentalist Christians and other shady characters.
| Agreed. Clinton's administration was more conservative in many aspects then Bush's. But then again, the average American's understanding of the spectrum is pretty pathetic. |
| |
07-13-08, 10:28 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Vagina Dentata
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Today 05:51 PM
Posts: 11,703
Thanks: 3,092
Thanked 1,751 Times in 1,324 Posts
Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child The former conservatives who've abandoned the ideology can't be considered Conservatives. What kind of "Conservative" blackmails the FDA into lying about a multitrillion dollar socialistic drug bill? Oh wait, not a Conservative.
Agreed. Clinton's administration was more conservative in many aspects then Bush's. But then again, the average American's understanding of the spectrum is pretty pathetic. | My understanding of the spectrum of conservative politics is probably "pretty pathetic" as well.
I do see the basic problem, but I also think many people- including some old enough to know better- might be overestimating how great the GOP really was back in the good old days. I remember people saying the same crap about Reagan, about Bush Sr.
My family is staunchly Democrat, so of course I grew up hearing a lot of bad stuff about these guys, but still. I doubt things were really so idyllic within the conservative party as they seem in retrospect.
But I agree that Clinton's administration was more conservative than the current one, in many ways. Clinton was a moderate, a centrist.
I don't see too many of those around, these days. They must be a dying breed. |
| |
07-13-08, 11:27 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Horrible Bastard
Join Date: May 2008 Last Online: Today 12:03 AM
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 52
Thanked 369 Times in 267 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child A user here has argued that liberals are for
1) Small government
2) Low government spending
3) Getting government out of our lives
And that Conservatives are for
1) Massive, huge government
2) Ridiculously obscene government spending
3) Large amounts of government in our lives
Now, I thought that conservatives were for the first list and liberals for the second, anyone willing to help me straighten this out? | I love this decade. 
__________________ HIMEOBS: More fun than you really wanted. |
| |
07-14-08, 01:36 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Realist
Join Date: Oct 2007 Last Online: Today 05:55 PM Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,115
Thanks: 277
Thanked 334 Times in 212 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 Historically, conservatives were for smaller government, less government spending.
The past decade or more, this is no longer the case.
That's why some conservatives make a differentiation between "neocons" and
"traditional republicans" or "paleo-conservatives" or whatever.
Conservatives aren't really very conservative any longer, since they crawled into bed with the fundamentalist Christians and other shady characters. | This from someone who didn't even know who Tim Russert was? Dismissed...
__________________ Have you ever wondered if your mom kissed you goodnight after giving your dad a blow job? You are now. |
| |
07-14-08, 01:42 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Young Money Millionaire
Dungeon Master
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Today 05:42 PM
Posts: 11,918
Thanks: 2,461
Thanked 2,703 Times in 1,747 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by P/N This from someone who didn't even know who Tim Russert was? Dismissed... | Can you say what is wrong with her assertion that traditionally conservatives are for small government/less government spending while in this decade neo-cons have proven they aren't for ANY of those things?
__________________ McSame/Moose Field Dresser 08! |
| |
07-14-08, 01:57 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Realist
Join Date: Oct 2007 Last Online: Today 05:55 PM Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,115
Thanks: 277
Thanked 334 Times in 212 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: Help me out here Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatuey Can you say what is wrong with her assertion that traditionally conservatives are for small government/less government spending while in this decade neo-cons have proven they aren't for ANY of those things? | Nope, but this is wrong: Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 Conservatives aren't really very conservative any longer, since they crawled into bed with the fundamentalist Christians and other shady characters. | I am a conservative and I haven't crawled into bed with anyone. I've been betrayed by my former party, but I'm still a conservative and I'm not alone in feeling betrayed. 1069 doesn't have a good grasp on this issue or any other. I'll give 1069 partial credit, but it's still a failing grade. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |