+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... LastLast

Thread: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

  1. #61
    Sage misterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    05-17-10 @ 09:17 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    8,218
    Thanks
    108
    Thanked 1,099 in 874 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Martel View Post
    Sorry, the devil is in the details, not the summary.
    But a good, reliable, well-written summary by a knowledgable source will include all the important details too. It's just a matter of writing it in plain language instead of legalese.

    If yer touting this plan and claiming it will reduce costs and save hundreds of billions....I believe the accountability bone and onus remain on those in favor.
    Sure. Just saying you don't need to read the bill word for word to really understand it.

  2. #62
    User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    05-04-10 @ 05:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 in 10 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    I wrote an article on my site about the purity. I haven't had a chance to go through all the posts in this thread, but my opinion on it is this:

    If they do it, it will create a war between the different factions of the party. If you are a moderate Republican who believes in small government, low taxes, and states rights for things such as gay marriage and abortion, and have a different approach to immigration, you can't be a Republican. That's dangerous for the party.

  3. #63
    Sage misterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    05-17-10 @ 09:17 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    8,218
    Thanks
    108
    Thanked 1,099 in 874 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by WTPPolitics View Post
    I wrote an article on my site about the purity. I haven't had a chance to go through all the posts in this thread, but my opinion on it is this:

    If they do it, it will create a war between the different factions of the party. If you are a moderate Republican who believes in small government, low taxes, and states rights for things such as gay marriage and abortion, and have a different approach to immigration, you can't be a Republican. That's dangerous for the party.
    Wow, somebody gets it.

  4. #64
    User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    05-04-10 @ 05:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 in 10 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Thanks a lot, Misterman. I'll have to read through the comments on this some more to see your stance.

  5. #65
    Moderator
    Unlce Mo's Bombin BBQ

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Location
    Herndon, Va
    Posts
    15,226
    Thanks
    7,387
    Thanked 9,788 in 5,312 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by misterman View Post
    It turned, but he didn't lose it because thousands of GOP voters suddenly decided to change their mind because he said a bad word.
    If not for one bad word that election would've almost unquestionably went to Allen.

    Yeah, it led to other things, it snow balled, but that's the thing that started the ball rolling.

    You remove Macaca and Allen would've had that race without question
    Those who give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither. However if you're giving it up to get a a bunch of free stuff then that's cool.

  6. #66
    Sage misterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    05-17-10 @ 09:17 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    8,218
    Thanks
    108
    Thanked 1,099 in 874 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    If not for one bad word that election would've almost unquestionably went to Allen.

    Yeah, it led to other things, it snow balled, but that's the thing that started the ball rolling.

    You remove Macaca and Allen would've had that race without question
    This is true.

  7. #67
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Seen
    06-03-10 @ 10:07 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Location
    In the land of steers and queers
    Posts
    1,563
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 135 in 106 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    You remove Macaca and Allen would've had that race without question
    If a frog had wings he wouldn't bump his ass a-hoppin'.

  8. #68
    Tea Party - Sage
    Vader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-01-10 @ 10:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    8,074
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,318
    Thanked 1,042 in 768 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    This is another reason why Conservatives left the GOP. Purity tests will doom any party.
    Indeed. Searching for purity is the mark of a facist. This is what droves the Nazis to murder 20 million people during WWII.

    This concept has no place in modern politics.

  9. #69
    Goddess of Bacon
    rivrrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    13,308
    Thanks
    3,656
    Thanked 6,150 in 3,489 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Quote Originally Posted by vauge View Post
    Micheal is pissing on the party I hold so dear.

    One of the things our party has cherished for centuries is the idea of debate and the ability to say what we think without recourse. Now, they are taking away a candidates freedom of speech!? If that isn't the bane of communism - I'm unsure what is! I want to know what my *candidate* thinks not what the party thinks.

    If this resolution passes, I'm burning my card.



    More of this crap here: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates - The Caucus Blog - NYTimes.com
    I love it. They're forcing the growth of a third party. Perfect.
    In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria.


  10. #70
    Professor Charles Martel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Seen
    03-21-10 @ 06:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 268 in 219 Posts

    Re: G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

    Now, afore we go outright dismissing....and I certainly cannot support a purity resolution or 'bar' if you will....the Party does need to defend itself. As a viscious salivating right wing radical Conservative neocon and I mean...I am to the right of Genghis Khan on many issues...the Party does need to remain the beacon.

    Fellow Repubs...there have been populist movements, party struggles, the neocons, the religious right, the fiscal conservatives, the Constitutionalists, the 'moderates', the pro-lifers, the tea-baggers, the birthers, those hating the Democrats, 'independents', military personnel and retired, government workers, union workers, private sector workers, farmers, civil services, anyone from any walk of life, we cut our teeth WITHIN the PARTY structure. We nominate and send up candidates AS A PARTY. While purity cannot be waged, once we nominate a candidate..he or she IS THE CANDIDATE. Your vote...even though it may not be your ideal candidate...as a Republican you MUST vote for this Candidate.

    The elections are too close. You cannot write in, you must not have dreams or aspirations of a third party, the Republican Party is where your teeth are cut, the Party is where your energy is focused. We cannot win with fractured groups of we're right and you're wrongs, we must cut our teeth as a Party. Realize all elections are local, refocus on Party platform, and start sending capable and honest men and women to the f'n Congress without concerning yourself with his or her particular vote.

    The issue of abortion a primary example. I have many conservative family members, if the candidate is pro-choice, they don't warrant their vote. I have Republican friends who sat home and didn't vote giving up on the Republicans, capitulating and now complaining as Barack's inexperience and clownishness reveals itself.

    Get with the program, People. It ain't about you, it ain't about me, it ain't about individual, we cut our teeth in the basement, your candidates emerge, the infighting below is dominated by the Conservatives..or the faithful...or the fiscally conservative...or the pro-lifers...whoever comes out of the slaughter carrying the flag......that's who we support. That's our man or woman.

    The purity idea way wrong however, the loyalty factor we need to to remind ourselves of every once in awhile. Get involved with politics locally and statewide, give a few bucks to the person you believe best suited but once the game starts....our sidelines CANNOT be divided.
    It was the Austrasians, that hewed on bravely through the thick of the fight, it was they who found and cut down the Saracen King.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts