Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > US Political Discussion > US Partisan Politics and Political Platforms



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-09, 02:11 PM   #21
User
 
cmckinney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Last Seen: 02-10-10 09:19 PM
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 65
Thanks: 59
Thanked 75 Times in 22 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottD View Post
For years Van Jones has been dropping his Communist ideas and has reformed to become a supporter of Green Business.

People change. You may not think it, but it is possible for someone to change their world views.
Oh please. How naive.
__________________
I cannot trust a man to control others who cannot control himself.
cmckinney is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 04:46 PM   #22
Enemy Combatant

 
Kandahar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: 03-11-10 12:13 AM
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,762
Thanks: 1,384
Thanked 3,873 Times in 2,212 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Realist1 View Post
The MSM is digging their Hole deeper and deeper.


The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy | Washington Examiner


From a Nexis search a few moments ago:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive all your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving President Obama's Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, your response would be, "Huh?" If you heard that that adviser, Van Jones, had apologized for a number of remarks and positions in the recent past, your response would be, "What?" And if you were in the Obama White House monitoring the Jones situation, you would be hoping that the news organizations listed above continue to hold the line -- otherwise, Jones, who is quite well thought of in Obama circles, would be history



Also,,,check out the "Comments" at the Site.
Who the hell cares? He's the Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise, and Innovation...not the Secretary of Defense.
__________________
Are you coming to bed?
I can't. This is important.
What?
Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD
Kandahar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 04:52 PM   #23
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 02:57 PM
Posts: 512
Thanks: 118
Thanked 56 Times in 49 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Realist1 View Post
The MSM is digging their Hole deeper and deeper.


The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy | Washington Examiner


From a Nexis search a few moments ago:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive all your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving President Obama's Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, your response would be, "Huh?" If you heard that that adviser, Van Jones, had apologized for a number of remarks and positions in the recent past, your response would be, "What?" And if you were in the Obama White House monitoring the Jones situation, you would be hoping that the news organizations listed above continue to hold the line -- otherwise, Jones, who is quite well thought of in Obama circles, would be history



Also,,,check out the "Comments" at the Site.
Are you really unable to work a simple search engine? If a previous poster found an article from the Washington Post how do we know there aren't any articles about Jones on the other sources you mentioned? This post was a fail.
__________________
Just because my tag is "slightly liberal" doesn't mean I am the stereotypical person on the left.
pro-bipartisan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 04:53 PM   #24
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 02:57 PM
Posts: 512
Thanks: 118
Thanked 56 Times in 49 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmckinney View Post
Oh please. How naive.
Do you have anything to rebute what he said?
__________________
Just because my tag is "slightly liberal" doesn't mean I am the stereotypical person on the left.
pro-bipartisan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 05:01 PM   #25
pro-homosexual bigot



 
Redress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Last Seen: Today 02:12 PM
Location: Michigan, home of the unemployed
Posts: 13,755
Thanks: 1,867
Thanked 4,868 Times in 2,925 Posts
Lean: Liberal

US Navy:  In the navy from 1987 to 1993, leaving honorably at end of enlistment as an AT2. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Realist1 View Post
The MSM is digging their Hole deeper and deeper.


The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy | Washington Examiner


From a Nexis search a few moments ago:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive all your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving President Obama's Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, your response would be, "Huh?" If you heard that that adviser, Van Jones, had apologized for a number of remarks and positions in the recent past, your response would be, "What?" And if you were in the Obama White House monitoring the Jones situation, you would be hoping that the news organizations listed above continue to hold the line -- otherwise, Jones, who is quite well thought of in Obama circles, would be history



Also,,,check out the "Comments" at the Site.
van jones - NYTimes.com Search

van jones search results on washingtonpost.com

This is why blogs do not belong in the BN news section. They do a horrid job of fact checking. I only checked the first two listed, and yes, they both talk about the Van Jones controversy.
Redress is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 05:02 PM   #26
User
 
cmckinney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Last Seen: 02-10-10 09:19 PM
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 65
Thanks: 59
Thanked 75 Times in 22 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Of course, why bother to defend this man when all you have to do is claim he's not important enough. My issue is less with this man and more with Barack Obama, who obviously knew this man's history when he appointed him.
__________________
I cannot trust a man to control others who cannot control himself.
cmckinney is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 05:16 PM   #27
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Last Seen: Today 03:54 PM
Posts: 2,714
Thanks: 87
Thanked 359 Times in 271 Posts
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
Who the hell cares?
the white house, obama's gonna have to fire him
The Prof is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 05:18 PM   #28
Enemy Combatant

 
Kandahar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: 03-11-10 12:13 AM
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,762
Thanks: 1,384
Thanked 3,873 Times in 2,212 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prof View Post
the white house, obama's gonna have to fire him
Whatever. I'm sure that will be a crippling blow to the Obama Administration, to lose this guy who no one had ever heard of a week ago.
__________________
Are you coming to bed?
I can't. This is important.
What?
Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD
Kandahar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 05:30 PM   #29
TOJ
Guru

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Last Seen: Today 02:47 PM
Location: USA
Posts: 3,132
Thanks: 268
Thanked 462 Times in 360 Posts
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
Whatever. I'm sure that will be a crippling blow to the Obama Administration, to lose this guy who no one had ever heard of a week ago.
Feeds into the story of BO's associates; Rev Wright, Ayers, .... Jones fits perfectly into that story.

Even dumping him will just sound typical of how Prez Doofus operates.


.
__________________
Americans do come up here for healthcare here, too. Really.
Your hatred for Obama is noted.... because, because... I can't defend Pres Doofus on the merits.
What kind of person cuts a baby out of a woman? ..... Abortionist.
TOJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-09, 05:31 PM   #30
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Last Seen: Today 03:54 PM
Posts: 2,714
Thanks: 87
Thanked 359 Times in 271 Posts
Re: The Van Jones (Non) Feeding Frenzy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
Whatever
good comeback

it's a painful blow in that it indicates the president is stupid enough to hire an open hater and racist to be a CZAR, let alone some little undersecretary of something

it's a hard hit in that the nation is talking all abuzz about this jones dude in the days leading up to obama's NEW health care announcement next wednesday

thus, no one's discussing the prospects of that prodigious plan for the disbursement of 16% of our national economy which the white house itself says it's STILL WORKING ON over the weekend

details for 16% of the economy to be determined sometime between sunday afternoon and monday nite, apparently

LOL!

after his extremely close relationship with the reverend wright, tho, many americans probably suspect that their president shares some of the views so loudly and hatefully expressed by mr jones

else why hire him?

obama's a little bit (not much) smarter than mr jones in that the prez has never been caught saying such idiocies

and so MANY of them

but he DID hire the guy, and reports are that he really liked the hater

it's a political loser, no way around it

it's gonna dominate the sunday talks

health care will have to take a back seat

LOL!

what an IDIOT this president is

remember when he ruined his primetime press conference on health care by bringing up professor gates (july 22)?

it's not all coincidence, friend, that obamacare has gone backwards every day since then

he lacks leadership, lacks credibility, doesn't look like he knows what he's doing

he's not in control

sorry

it's really kinda surprising these things need to be explained
The Prof is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts