• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How liberals sound.

Again, all the rational people. Keep going with that, though. People will grow numb to it as it continues to be lots of talk and hype with nothing to show for it.

Interrupting Cspan and MSNBC at the exact moment when the speakers are talking about Russia is disturbing. It's also censorship and who besides Trump likes censorship? Russia. No one else has anything to gain by blocking people talking bad about Russia on TV....except Russia and their Siberian candidate, Trump the Traitor.
 
You're right, anybody who is a liberal should start talking about how they like to grope women and can do whatever they want to women.

That's what real men do.
Well...THIS liberal did more than talk about it and hell...you seem pretty tight with that. So...sure...

index.jpeg
 
I think the pertinent question here is: why is it important to you to dismiss the intelligence community's agreement that Russia influenced our election?

Because there are a lot of us serving that don't want to be used as cannon fodder for more political bull****. It's nice that lots of other people out there aren't the ones having their asses on the line, so it's really convenient to go full hog into the hype.

However, history has shown us that a lot of these things eventually turn out to be not what they are presented as. Remember when the lies were told about the Iraqi soldiers were dumping babies out on the floor, which swung public opinion? Yeah...how about the Gulf of Tonkin. Assad used sarin gas. Saddam had WMDs. Hillary saying that Qaddafi gave Viagra to his troops to commit mass rape. I mean...hey, lets just kill more of us and turn more countries into bigger ****-holes because people got their feelings hurt over elections and political elites are playing politics. Funny how people always seem to jump on these bandwagons when it suits them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_(testimony)

In 1992, it was revealed that Nayirah's last name was al-Ṣabaḥ (Arabic: نيره الصباح‎‎) and that she was the daughter of Saud Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Furthermore, it was revealed that her testimony was organized as part of the Citizens for a Free Kuwait public relations campaign

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident#Distortion_of_the_event

In October 2005 The New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted intelligence reports passed to policy makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. The NSA historian concluded that the motive was not political, but rather to cover up honest, but errant, intelligence.[51]

Syrian rebels used Sarin nerve gas, not Assad's regime: U.N. official - Washington Times

Testimony from victims strongly suggests it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that used Sarin nerve gas during a recent incident in the revolution-wracked nation, a senior U.N. diplomat said Monday.
Carla del Ponte, a member of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told Swiss TV there were “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof,” that rebels seeking to oust Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad had used the nerve agent.

US intel: No evidence of Viagra as weapon in Libya - World news - Mideast/N. Africa | NBC News
 
Don't forget to include the entire intelligence community as well as numerous Republican congressmen. And 82% of Americans.

"The entire intelligence community" is a lie that is only believe by those who don't know how the "intelligence community" works. When you have a solid case for something, with plenty of evidence, you don't put things like "RT is giving 3rd party candidates a platform and the two party system doesn't represent a large portion of U.S. citizens."

That's what you call filler.
 
Profits...huh? Russia isn't doing it for profits...they're doing it to weaken and divide the US from within and to gain an advantage on the world stage.

When foreign governments hack, they don't usually do it to get money..

Uh...profits in that context doesn't mean money. It means they gain nothing. I mean, seriously, hardly no one watches C-SPAN and interrupting some hack grandstanding doesn't do anything. It's not like it's not all going to be on youtube, regardless. And then to put RT on there is so stupidly obvious that it directly contradicts what you say their goal is.

Some people believe the most ridiculous things.
 
Even more interesting is that you're the one that started a thread about the Russians...just so you can whine about liberals. Now I wonder if you can go two seconds without whining about liberals.

No. See? That was an easy answer.
 
Interrupting Cspan and MSNBC at the exact moment when the speakers are talking about Russia is disturbing. It's also censorship and who besides Trump likes censorship? Russia. No one else has anything to gain by blocking people talking bad about Russia on TV....except Russia and their Siberian candidate, Trump the Traitor.

You know who also likes censorship? Liberals. That's why they form giant mobs to attack the political opposition to levels requiring riot polices. That's why they attack college students that bring on conservative speakers. Wait...this is good. Using your "logic" liberals ARE Russian!!!! Mind. blown.
 
You know who also likes censorship? Liberals. That's why they form giant mobs to attack the political opposition to levels requiring riot polices. That's why they attack college students that bring on conservative speakers. Wait...this is good. Using your "logic" liberals ARE Russian!!!! Mind. blown.

You mean like "literally attacked", or more like "triggered". Outrage or injury?
 
You mean like "literally attacked", or more like "triggered". Outrage or injury?

Sometimes attacked. Sometimes intimidated. Sometimes had the event shut down due to security reasons. Completely take over their event.

 
Sometimes attacked. Sometimes intimidated. Sometimes had the event shut down due to security reasons. Completely take over their event.

Milo should take up tweeting. Lot safer that way.
 
Milo should take up tweeting. Lot safer that way.

Why should he have to? You're making my point for me by saying he should just hide out. It's a tacit acknowledgement of what I'm saying.
 
Why should he have to? You're making my point for me by saying he should just hide out. It's a tacit acknowledgement of what I'm saying.

In my opinion, as long as he's not seriously injured, any attacks on Milo redound to his benefit. I think he's aware of it, I think he actively courts it, and I think he loves it.

If the student protesters would listen to me, I'd tell them to stop validating him. But the kids... they just won't listen.
 
In my opinion, as long as he's not seriously injured, any attacks on Milo redound to his benefit. I think he's aware of it, I think he actively courts it, and I think he loves it.

If the student protesters would listen to me, I'd tell them to stop validating him. But the kids... they just won't listen.

He openly admits just that by calling himself a provocateur. He knows exactly what he's doing. However, that shouldn't matter. People shouldn't have their events attacked and shut down, just because someone else doesn't like it. Again, there is no parallel to be found when rolls are reversed and liberals are being attacked.
 
He openly admits just that by calling himself a provocateur. He knows exactly what he's doing. However, that shouldn't matter. People shouldn't have their events attacked and shut down, just because someone else doesn't like it. Again, there is no parallel to be found when rolls are reversed and liberals are being attacked.

Politics is like professional wrestling nowadays. Young people are, more or less, the most likely to protest... and radicalized young people trend Left.

Meanwhile... You could ask Amy Schumer or Wanda Sykes how they feel about conservative "audiences" at their shows. They'd both have some horror stories to tell.
And then there's Geraldo Rivera, who made a career for himself out of getting beaten up by neo-nazis.

Ya just got to dig a little deep, and you'll find other examples. Plenty of entertainers have fielded threats and boycotts from the Radical Right over the years.
 
Politics is like professional wrestling nowadays. Young people are, more or less, the most likely to protest... and radicalized young people trend Left.

Meanwhile... You could ask Amy Schumer or Wanda Sykes how they feel about conservative "audiences" at their shows. They'd both have some horror stories to tell.
And then there's Geraldo Rivera, who made a career for himself out of getting beaten up by neo-nazis.

Ya just got to dig a little deep, and you'll find other examples. Plenty of entertainers have fielded threats and boycotts from the Radical Right over the years.

Those damned radical right liberals are the worst liberals, ever.
 
The late Senator Joe McCarthy has turned in his grave so many times that he's expected to reach the earth's core by next Sunday.
 
The article doesn't seem to support your opinion. In fact, it seems to support what liberals AND many republicans have been saying about Russia's hacking, fake news, etc...

"...On Thursday, C-SPAN’s broadcast of proceedings in the U.S. House of Representatives got bumped off the air during an anti-Trump speech by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA). C-SPAN’s signal was replaced by approximately 10 minutes of programming from Russia Today, the English language cable network owned by the Russian government...."​

If you continue to ignore the obvious, it's more likely that people will start to ignore you.

Find any Russian agents under your bed lately?

C-SPAN interrupted by Russian news site RT - CBS News

Spokesman Howard Mortman said the website, www.c-span.org, was replaced by RT for about 10 minutes. The problem was likely a routing issue because RT is one of the networks that C-SPAN regularly monitors, he said.

The network is “investigating and troubleshooting this occurrence,” Mortman said. The network later said it doesn’t believe it was hacked.

The programming glitch came hours after a power outage interrupted a Senate confirmation hearing for Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kan., to head the CIA. The hearing reconvened in a different room.
 
Back
Top Bottom