• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did Hillary Clinton just squander her "get out of jail free" card?

CanadaJohn said:
The worst thing President Trump could do is make the Clintons relevant again and sympathetic to boot. Have Republicans learned nothing from the over the top persecution of President Clinton??

The American voters plunged a stake into the heart of the Clintons and buried them - don't resurrect them and give them new life.
Click to expand...
Yeah, they've learned that it wins presidential elections. ;)

BTW, Hillary was not "persecuted", everything she has endured she brought upon herself. The only reason she hasn't been prosecuted, is because of a corrupt and morally bankrupt Obama "justice" dept.

I see now that you were talking about Bubba. But I'll leave my comments, because I still think they stand.
 
Last edited:
Sietske22 said:
Hillary didn't intentionally give Top Secret info to people she knew had no business seeing it.
Click to expand...

Sure she did.
That is how emails ended up on wieners laptop.

We don't know who saw it as her server was hacked by outside forces.
Not to mention that she took classified data home with her which again violates the law.

If you don't believe me the CIA director during the 90's was fired for the same reason.
 
nota bene said:
Gregg Jarrett of Fox News thinks Clinton has blown it:

While Clinton may be a smart person, it makes no sense whatsoever for her to risk criminal indictment by alienating the one person who can best insulate her from the legal consequences of her own extremely careless, if not intentional, conduct. And for what? A recount that is destined to fail?

By contesting the presidential election, Clinton does damage only to herself. When, during the election, Trump suggested he might not accept the result if he lost, Clinton called it “horrifying.” Did it ever occur to her that she is now committing the same “horrifying” act she so vehemently condemned? Gregg Jarrett: Did Hillary Clinton just squander her get out of jail free card? | Fox News

Jarrett thinks Clinton's gracious concession encouraged Trump to respond magnanimously but warns that when the recipient of a gift "exhibits a conspicuous lack of gratitude," that gift might be taken right back.

We will see.
Click to expand...

No you will not see because Clinton has not been convicted of anything, no matter how many times the right has gone after her. Hence she needs no get out of jail card because if she has not been convicted there is nothing to pardon. Always funny watching Cons trying to put that horse behind the cart and expecting to go somewhere.
 
CanadaJohn said:
The worst thing President Trump could do is make the Clintons relevant again and sympathetic to boot. Have Republicans learned nothing from the over the top persecution of President Clinton??

The American voters plunged a stake into the heart of the Clintons and buried them - don't resurrect them and give them new life.
Click to expand...

Hey now, Stupid has to be true unto itself and continue to be Stupid, it is what they do. There is no cure.
 
ludin said:
Sure she did.
That is how emails ended up on wieners laptop.

We don't know who saw it as her server was hacked by outside forces.
Not to mention that she took classified data home with her which again violates the law.

If you don't believe me the CIA director during the 90's was fired for the same reason.
Click to expand...

They ended up there through the wife. So do you actually know the situation or do you just make it up as you go? Yeah, I bet no other Sec of State has had classified data in their home, good grief.
 
Casper said:
They ended up there through the wife. So do you actually know the situation or do you just make it up as you go? Yeah, I bet no other Sec of State has had classified data in their home, good grief.
Click to expand...

It doesn'5 matter why they were there classified data ended up in the hands of someone not approved to see it.
It doesn't matter what others had or didn't prove they did something and I expect the same for them.

We know for a fact that she did.
 
ludin said:
It doesn'5 matter why they were there classified data ended up in the hands of someone not approved to see it.
It doesn't matter what others had or didn't prove they did something and I expect the same for them.

We know for a fact that she did.
Click to expand...
Actually it does matter because the mishandling was not Hillary but the morons wife. But go ahead stomp your feet and yell Hillary all you want, no one cares any more.
 
Casper said:
No you will not see because Clinton has not been convicted of anything, no matter how many times the right has gone after her. Hence she needs no get out of jail card because if she has not been convicted there is nothing to pardon. Always funny watching Cons trying to put that horse behind the cart and expecting to go somewhere.
Click to expand...

I thought this discussion was about whether Trump may be reconsidering appointing a special prosecutor. It would be up to that person to conduct an investigation. I haven't discussed a pardon or a conviction.
 
nota bene said:
I thought this discussion was about whether Trump may be reconsidering appointing a special prosecutor. It would be up to that person to conduct an investigation. I haven't discussed a pardon or a conviction.
Click to expand...
Get out of Jail Card implies that to me. Special prosecutor for a Clinton, how did that work out last time? I do know it cost the People over $3,000,000 for nothing. If the Repubs are even half way smart they will let this die off like Hillary's career, don't and she becomes a Martyr to the left and galvanizes the voters that did not bother this time and that might not work out for the conservative agenda. I think they might actually learn something this time but then again I have thought that before and they proved they learned nothing.
 
I think this is all the recount is going to accomplish.



Trump supporters will get to celebrate...aaaaaagain. And there will be once again much weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth.

Not very well-played IMO.
 
Sietske22 said:
Yes!!! Make her a martyr!! Turn her into a victimized woman, hunted by vindictive and petty political hacks.

Would make for great tv.
Click to expand...

Worked out great for Nixon! Oh, wait...
 
Sietske22 said:
The charges against Clinton are child's play compared to what Nixon was accused of.
Click to expand...

No, they really aren't. I don't think Nixon's actions contributed to anyone's death.
 
VanceMack said:
I think this is all the recount is going to accomplish.



Trump supporters will get to celebrate...aaaaaagain. And there will be once again much weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth.

Not very well-played IMO.
Click to expand...


Speaking of the gnashing of teeth: "A Party of Teeth-Gnashers" by Victor Davi Hanson: Page not found | National Review
 
OpportunityCost said:
No, they really aren't. I don't think Nixon's actions contributed to anyone's death.
Click to expand...

Can you point out which republican led investigation into Benghazi ever determined how Clinton was at fault for American deaths?

Thanks.
 
roughdraft274 said:
Can you point out which republican led investigation into Benghazi ever determined how Clinton was at fault for American deaths?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

See that fancy word contributed? Examine that.
 
OpportunityCost said:
What did Rachel Maddow tell you? Oh wait she was wrong, Hillary lost. :roll:
Click to expand...

Don't know. Never listen to her. Not many people do if the ratings are correct. Only idiots would watch drivel like hannity or maddow, just spewing talking points fitting an agenda and not saying anything that goes against preconceived notions and possibly upset the the lemmings. Which is why Hannity has such a large audience I'm guessing.

Did it upset you that I should question the great one? No offense meant.
 
nota bene said:
Gregg Jarrett of Fox News thinks Clinton has blown it:

While Clinton may be a smart person, it makes no sense whatsoever for her to risk criminal indictment by alienating the one person who can best insulate her from the legal consequences of her own extremely careless, if not intentional, conduct. And for what? A recount that is destined to fail?

By contesting the presidential election, Clinton does damage only to herself. When, during the election, Trump suggested he might not accept the result if he lost, Clinton called it “horrifying.” Did it ever occur to her that she is now committing the same “horrifying” act she so vehemently condemned? Gregg Jarrett: Did Hillary Clinton just squander her get out of jail free card? | Fox News

Jarrett thinks Clinton's gracious concession encouraged Trump to respond magnanimously but warns that when the recipient of a gift "exhibits a conspicuous lack of gratitude," that gift might be taken right back.

We will see.
Click to expand...

In tin pot dictatorships, the political opposition knows better than to challenge El Presidenté. Bad things tend to happen to them.
 
roughdraft274 said:
Don't know. Never listen to her. Not many people do if the ratings are correct. Only idiots would watch drivel like hannity or maddow, just spewing talking points fitting an agenda and not saying anything that goes against preconceived notions and possibly upset the the lemmings. Which is why Hannity has such a large audience I'm guessing.

Did it upset you that I should question the great one? No offense meant.
Click to expand...

LOL I don't watch Hannity.
 
roughdraft274 said:
Can you point out where they found her actions contributed to American deaths?

Thx
Click to expand...

Her responsibility was for the security of her personnel. Their deaths are her responsibility whether you admit it or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom