• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Our partisan FBI

Kal'Stang said:
I've posted evidence. I used logic. Only thing that you've done is say "nuh uh". Think we are done here.
Click to expand...

You know Kal, maybe it is best if you cut and run. We both knew you were going to. Anyhoo, ".gov is more secure than private server" is only logic to you. To me it was irrelevant and deflecting. It had nothing to do with anything I posted. You were desperate to find words to deflect from the fact that you didnt even know .gov was not secure. And Kal, how do you interpret me posting exactly what Comey said as "nuh uh"? Your "evidence" proves me right but you couldnt even admit you misread my posts so you blamed me with "wah wah you implied it". Yea kal, if you lack the integrity to admit you misread my posts then denying I posted exactly what Comey said is a walk in the park for you. seriously Kal, how do you ignore this when I post it.

"Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information".

what is it in your brain that tells you its perfectly normal to ignore that statement and pretend you posted "evidence" to the contrary?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom